Enough with the coach comparisons before Pike

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,801
13,061
78
Yes, but the coach we are evaluating COACHES AT RUTGERS. So it is completely relevant to the evaluation.

you also seem to be unable to grasp the distinction between
(A) this guy is good because he’s better than our previous coaches
And
(B) this guy is good because he was handicapped by what the previous coaches did, making his record that would be mediocre elsewhere actually quite good

we’re all saying (b) and you keep arguing against (a)
His first 5 years at RU wouldn’t even be mediocre output most places. There was no portal in 2016-17 and transfers had to sit out a year before playing. Without the portal, you don’t go from 7 wins to the NCAAs in a year or two with a complete rebuild job. I don’t care which school we’re talking about. So after 3 years of rebuilding - Pike took us to the tournament 2 years in a row. Last year we made it to the second round. Following a 7 win season, I can’t see how too many non-blue blood fan bases could realistically expect more from any coach in that situation. Put aside Rutgers history.
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
His first 5 years at RU wouldn’t even be mediocre output most places. There was no portal in 2016-17 and transfers had to sit out a year before playing. Without the portal, you don’t go from 7 wins to the NCAAs in a year or two with a complete rebuild job. I don’t care which school we’re talking about. So after 3 years of rebuilding - Pike took us to the tournament 2 years in a row. Last year we made it to the second round. Following a 7 win season, I can’t see how too many non-blue blood fan bases could realistically expect more from any coach in that situation. Put aside Rutgers history.
Well when I say mediocre I am really only counting the last three years including this one and completely ignoring the starting point.

I think in general there are plenty of fanbases who would be reasonably nonplussed at having the #30ish, #40ish, and #100ish teams over the course of 3 seasons. 10 years from now if we had the same span of 3 years after a bunch of relative success I might even be complaining. But so what? The context matters.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,801
13,061
78
Well when I say mediocre I am really only counting the last three years including this one and completely ignoring the starting point.

I think in general there are plenty of fanbases who would be reasonably nonplussed at having the #30ish, #40ish, and #100ish teams over the course of 3 seasons. 10 years from now if we had the same span of 3 years after a bunch of relative success I might even be complaining. But so what? The context matters.
Exactly - but he keeps saying your saying it’s not mediocre because “we’re Rutgers”. The point is that following 3 consecutive seasons of 12, 10 and 7 wins - winning 14-15 games in years 1-3 and then making back to back NCAA tournaments in years 4 and 5 (and winning a game in round 1) would be a pretty darn good 5 year resume for a coach anywhere. This year the team is obviously having a set back, but there’s no school in America that would have a coach on the chopping block in this situation (blue bloods don’t produce losing seasons like we did 3 years in a row so the scenerio would never apply at those places).
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluoxetine

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
Exactly - but he keeps saying your saying it’s not mediocre because “we’re Rutgers”. The point is that following 3 consecutive seasons of 12, 10 and 7 wins - winning 14-15 games in years 1-3 and then making back to back NCAA tournaments in years 4 and 5 (and winning a game in round 1) would be a pretty darn good 5 year resume for a coach anywhere. This year the team is obviously having a set back, but there’s no school in America that would have a coach on the chopping block in this situation (blue bloods don’t produce losing seasons like we did 3 years in a row so the scenerio would never apply at those places).
The other part of this thing is that tons of people (based on somewhat legitimate concerns about recruiting, to be fair) have utterly convinced themselves that we will be terrible next year and the following year and are now behaving as if this has already happened.
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,772
19,909
61
Yes, but the coach we are evaluating COACHES AT RUTGERS. So it is completely relevant to the evaluation.

you also seem to be unable to grasp the distinction between
(A) this guy is good because he’s better than our previous coaches
And
(B) this guy is good because he was handicapped by what the previous coaches did, making his record that would be mediocre elsewhere actually quite good

we’re all saying (b) and you keep arguing against (a)
yeah I think both arguments are stupid tbh.

Our previous coaches didn’t have the luxury that Pike has had. Not even close.
 

KnightTerrors

All-Conference
Dec 23, 2015
1,039
2,992
82
yeah I think both arguments are stupid tbh.

Our previous coaches didn’t have the luxury that Pike has had. Not even close.

You realize that Pikiells “practice facility” for his first four years was the RAC without air conditioning right? Even with that he raised the level of recruiting and started winning from day one. Now we have a facility that is on par (not above) with every other school. It’s the expectation at this level, not an advantage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: runrutgersrun

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,772
19,909
61
You realize that Pikiells “practice facility” for his first four years was the RAC without air conditioning right? Even with that he raised the level of recruiting and started winning from day one. Now we have a facility that is on par (not above) with every other school. It’s the expectation at this level, not an advantage.
He had school support.
No coach before him had school support (at least in my lifetime).

Hobbs cares about basketball, he gives zero fvcks about football.

Additionally, his regional competition has been complete crap since he’s taken over. UConn is awake now though so I expect us to lose recruits to them now.
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
The other part of this thing is that tons of people (based on somewhat legitimate concerns about recruiting, to be fair) have utterly convinced themselves that we will be terrible next year and the following year and are now behaving as if this has already happened.
Without being too unkind to our current seniors......we could have the only guys what should be wearing Cs next year wear Cs. I think this fact is very underrated. It was the primary reason my preseason prediction for the team was way below consensus and I didn't buy in to the preseason hype.
 

WPUknight

Senior
Oct 23, 2008
1,543
685
0
We think it is a good job because we are alum, live in the area, has family go to RU, etc… everyone else without scarlet colored glasses know it is a bad job or at the very least not as good as the top tier teams in the conference
If this is a bad job...then what is Seton Hall?
 
Last edited:

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
The best idea the fire pike crowd has had so far is to try to poach the guy from Oklahoma state who inherited a borderline top 25 team and brought them to the heights of… basically equivalent to pikes teams at Rutgers.
Nope . The best ideas are pitino or Sean Miller. But pike isn’t getting fired anytime soon. And this school doesn’t have the balls to hire one of those guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: runrutgersrun

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
The facilities were an absolute joke. The RAC scoreboard was something you see at a high school gym. Every coach we had was hamstrung because of these issues.

This is a different time at Rutgers. We can’t give this man a free pass for years to come just because he got us to the dance one time. We have the money, we have the facilities and we have a renovated arena on the way. THIS IS A GOOD JOB!
Twice. He may not be perfect but has done a great job not matter what you say.

Agree this is a good job. We are in a better place now than we were but he has done a good job making us relevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ancienthooper

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Without being too unkind to our current seniors......we could have the only guys what should be wearing Cs next year wear Cs. I think this fact is very underrated. It was the primary reason my preseason prediction for the team was way below consensus and I didn't buy in to the preseason hype.
Not sure how much you can blame their leadership on Hyatt and Jones not contributing. That's one of the main reasons this team has underperformed IMO. One of the 2 needed to be a scorer off the bench. Both would have been amazing but one and we have a reliable bench scorer. The roster doesn't have it now. If it did, we could withstand Geo and Ron off games better
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,986
9,394
113
Went the team earns props I give them props. When the team looks like a JV squad, I call them out.
I looked up your post history on this forum. You've been very active so it's not like you were away from posting after the following games.

Posts by you on the free board (I'm not a premium member) about the wins against Iowa, Maryland and Michigan: zero

Posts by you on the Nebraska comeback last weekend: two. One that says "Lol Geo", and one that said you missed the first half.

You didn't think any of those wins deserved props?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRU2RU_rivals
Feb 5, 2003
10,986
9,394
113
To throw in my two cents - I'm not saying Pike will deserve a statue or to still be our coach in 2030, although I hope that he works out long term. Am I concerned about the ratings and performance of our last few recruiting classes? Yes, although I hope to see continued growth from the guys and good team basketball to overcome the lack of recruiting stars. Has Pike earned a leash by getting us where nobody else had in the past 30 years? Of course.

Let's see what happens the rest of this season, in the offseason in the transfer portal, and next year in recruiting and on the court. If we drop to the bottom of the B1G and recruiting lags, turn up the heat on that seat.
 

The RUT

Heisman
Oct 30, 2011
35,772
19,909
61
I looked up your post history on this forum. You've been very active so it's not like you were away from posting after the following games.

Posts by you on the free board (I'm not a premium member) about the wins against Iowa, Maryland and Michigan: zero

Posts by you on the Nebraska comeback last weekend: two. One that says "Lol Geo", and one that said you missed the first half.

You didn't think any of those wins deserved props?
Posted premium board
 

fluoxetine

Heisman
Nov 11, 2012
23,529
16,898
0
What makes you think that some of these idiots are RU fans & not trolls from other schools trying to stir the pot?
The most annoying ones are way too clued in and persistent to not actually be interested in Rutgers basketball imo
 

SantaFeScarlet

All-Conference
Aug 8, 2001
5,217
3,004
113
Yawn.

Another loser mentality chiming in.

Pike is a dud. It’s the reason our team is soft af. It’s the reason our seniors bend over and take it for the first 30 minutes of each game.

No killer instinct, no attitude, it starts with the head coach.
+100000
 

ImBadRU

All-Conference
Apr 3, 2002
5,471
2,497
0
Pike is paid a lot of money to recruit and win. This year and next and the year after are not looking good unless he really get players. He gets next year in my book to recruit, portal wutever he needs to. If he can't do that he ain't winning.
 

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,801
13,061
78
Without being too unkind to our current seniors......we could have the only guys what should be wearing Cs next year wear Cs. I think this fact is very underrated. It was the primary reason my preseason prediction for the team was way below consensus and I didn't buy in to the preseason hype.
I was put off by the pre-season hype and pretty vocal about it.

But I think we may be better positioned than most think we will though in regard to what your talking about for next year. We are going to get some players in the portal, our returning guys have the off season to develop, and we may get a frosh or two who can contribute off the bench. It’s way too soon to assume we’re going to be terrible next year. Sometimes your better off just returning a group of role players and starting fresh. Let’s see what happens.
 

BillyC80

Heisman
Oct 23, 2006
17,164
15,644
72
By 2012 Matt Painter’s Purdue teams had won 22 or more games for 6 straight years, then proceeded to play sub-500 ball in 2013 and 2014.

How does that happen? I can see one down year after so much success, when key guys graduate or go pro, but 2 years in a row?

My point is that even the best coaches in the B1G can have down years after successful ones, where they miss out on the NCAA or even the NIT tournament.

Crazy thing is, while this is clearly a down year for RU, we still have at least 10 more games to lift our season with a strong enough record to qualify for a post-season tournament. I say we find a way…
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
How can you say that? Gettys? Yeboah? JY?

This is the first time since the sit out rule change that we’ll be looking to replace 2 starters.
Exactly he has hit some winners and this year its a completely different scenario with Ron and Geo departing vs looking for a depth 5.

B1G starting role and chance to be focal point of the offense. That's an attractive role.

Let's see who Pike brings in before assuming he can't get it done. He hasn't earned that much respect from the fans? If he brings in underwhelming talent in the portal for next year, fine rip him then. There will be plenty of time for it
 
  • Like
Reactions: fluoxetine

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,801
13,061
78
Carter was a solid role player too. I forgot about him. When Geo was out, remember that Paul, Caleb and Mag were starting to play together nicely (see Purdue game). We’re not starting from scratch. We’re returning Cliff and a group of solid role players with experience.
 

hinson32

All-American
Jul 29, 2005
7,830
6,004
57
Meet FHJ: Killer recruiter with a vision and a plan
I go to a lot of RU Baseball games and I used to talk to FHJ a lot when he was an assistant at Nova. He had this grand vision to turn RU around. He made me convinced he was going to recruit and win big at Rutgers. He has me fooled, good thing I am not an AD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loyal_2RU

Loyal_2RU

Heisman
Aug 6, 2001
15,274
11,103
113
I go to a lot of RU Baseball games and I used to talk to FHJ a lot when he was an assistant at Nova. He had this grand vision to turn RU around. He made me convinced he was going to recruit and win big at Rutgers. He has me fooled, good thing I am not an AD.
I suspect his vision was solid.
He was not able to execute.
Lacked basic management skills.
L