Ruth Bader Ginesburg

jray1350

Freshman
Feb 5, 2003
3,673
81
48
Ruth Bader Ginesburg has passed away at age 87

While I certainly disagreed with her political positions, as a lawyer, I admire the vigor of her views and how hard she worked to become the second woman to earn the honor of being a Supreme Court Justice and the first Jewish woman to earn that position. God Bless.
 

Orlaco

Senior
Dec 13, 2007
29,525
628
113
She probably lived long enough to accomplish her final career goal.
 

EerNearClemson

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2004
7,285
2,311
113
There were several women candidates on Trump's list of potential replacements. I see no reason why he won't try to fill that spot.

In the meantime, there are 3 scheduled debates looming. Should make those discussions even more heated, if not polar.
 

sabres1

Senior
Oct 23, 2007
11,756
427
68
While I certainly disagreed with her political positions, as a lawyer, I admire the vigor of her views and how hard she worked to become the second woman to earn the honor of being a Supreme Court Justice and the first Jewish woman to earn that position. God Bless.
Very well said. RIP Justice Ginsberg.
 

KingofTowers

Redshirt
Dec 4, 2013
15,204
0
0
Regardless who picks the next SCJ. The judge’s SCV will have 40+ votes against. That is crazy for a life term position.
 
Dec 30, 2004
2,367
210
63
There were several women candidates on Trump's list of potential replacements. I see no reason why he won't try to fill that spot.

In the meantime, there are 3 scheduled debates looming. Should make those discussions even more heated, if not polar.

I see no reason why he won't try to fill that spot.

If you know the name Merrick Garland, and you believe there is no reason not to fill that seat, you have absolutely sense of decency.
 

EerNearClemson

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2004
7,285
2,311
113
I‘m in favor, but probably not after Barry’s canceled nomination of Merrick Garland in a Presidential election year.
But Barrack did not have the votes in the Senate. It was actually Mcconnell who put the brakes on the process.

So, we will see. I would think a woman would have to be nominated first because it's going to be so turbulent. I'll never forget how Brett Kavanaugh was treated during his process. The left was brutal.
 

EerNearClemson

All-Conference
Nov 30, 2004
7,285
2,311
113
And there it is, straight from Mcconnell.

"president Trump's nominee will get a vote on the Senate floor."
 

wvu_ivey

Freshman
Jan 26, 2006
12,641
98
48
Ruth Bader Ginesburg has passed away at age 87
Not sure if he'll have the votes in the Senate. Should have the votes in the judicial committee, but Romney, Murkowski and Collins will probably vote against.

Hell, I am a staunch conservative and I really don't know whether it's a good idea or not. I know with every fiber of my being the Dems would not hesitate to shove a nominee thru if they had the Senate and the Prez, so I'lm probably for it.

But let's say Trump gets it done, then the Dems get the Prez and Senate. First thing they would suspend the filibuster and expand the SCOTUS to 15 members with 6 new far, far, FAR left justices.
 

Raven Shaddock

Redshirt
Oct 15, 2016
17,326
0
0
And there it is, straight from Mcconnell.

"president Trump's nominee will get a vote on the Senate floor."
For the record, the past couple months I am have been warning folks this is going to be the most eventful 2-3 months in modern American history. Of course, "eventful" was a kind way of saying the events would be unpleasant and bloody ... which as you can see in the streets, it has intensified and is only going to escalate.

Notice how the Abraham Accord has people talking "peace". I seem to recall text saying something about "When they say peace and safety ..."but I digress. Things are going to become so turbulent, here and abroad, that the calls for civility will rise in lockstep with a rise in rioting and violence here. Perhaps people need to see who Rabbi Yaakov Zisholtz claims to be in talks with. Unbelievable.

However, in no way did I factor a passing of Ruth Bader into the equation. There's really no words other than to say you have to sit back in awe as you watch how all of this is unfolding. This is not about the United States. This is a world about to be turned on its head.

What a crazy (and earth-shaking) road that lay ahead.

Looking to man (namely elected and unelected officials) to fix problems that THEY created.

Pure madness.
 

rog1187

All-American
May 29, 2001
70,068
5,705
113
Not sure if he'll have the votes in the Senate. Should have the votes in the judicial committee, but Romney, Murkowski and Collins will probably vote against.

Hell, I am a staunch conservative and I really don't know whether it's a good idea or not. I know with every fiber of my being the Dems would not hesitate to shove a nominee thru if they had the Senate and the Prez, so I'lm probably for it.

But let's say Trump gets it done, then the Dems get the Prez and Senate. First thing they would suspend the filibuster and expand the SCOTUS to 15 members with 6 new far, far, FAR left justices.
What happens if he doesn’t nominate and still loses the election? He has to nominate and get that through.
 

Airport

All-American
Dec 12, 2001
86,989
7,797
113
Thats one reason to go forward necausev
But Barrack did not have the votes in the Senate. It was actually Mcconnell who put the brakes on the process.

So, we will see. I would think a woman would have to be nominated first because it's going to be so turbulent. I'll never forget how Brett Kavanaugh was treated during his process. The left was brutal.
that’s one good reason to go forward. The lefts lying on kavanaugh
 

wvu_ivey

Freshman
Jan 26, 2006
12,641
98
48
What happens if he doesn’t nominate and still loses the election? He has to nominate and get that through.
I agree. At the end of the day, it's an opportunity that hasn't been there since 1973. You have to take that shot, and he will.

I just really wish I had a crystal ball and could tell whether it's going to help or hurt the good guys in 33 Senate races and the Presidential race.

I think it's going to help, but man it's scary if they take over the POTUS and Senate and are ffffffffurious about the new SCOTUS justice.
 

MikeIII

Senior
Feb 1, 2005
7,178
523
113
I agree. At the end of the day, it's an opportunity that hasn't been there since 1973. You have to take that shot, and he will.

I just really wish I had a crystal ball and could tell whether it's going to help or hurt the good guys in 33 Senate races and the Presidential race.

I think it's going to help, but man it's scary if they take over the POTUS and Senate and are ffffffffurious about the new SCOTUS justice.
Does the vote happen before the election? I think it should but it’s not hard to imagine it getting drug past that point.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
194
0
The year 2020 is like the 1980's-1990's WWF Royal Rumble..........just never know who is going to enter the ring, then the music hits, and BAM.....it's on!
 
Dec 11, 2002
10,842
555
113
Does the vote happen before the election? I think it should but it’s not hard to imagine it getting drug past that point.

Mitch just said it would.

I think the lesser of the evils is for it to happen, although some squish RHINO types are already lining up with no votes.
 
WV Sports

Latest

  1. 01 WV Sports Rick Trickett won't lower the bar for anybody on his offensive line
  2. 02 WV Sports West Virginia looks for improved play on defensive front
  3. 03 WV Sports West Virginia fall camp is here. Join WVSports.com for 75% off
  4. 04 WV Sports Why Finley Bizjack believes this WVU team has the talent to be good
  5. 05 WV Sports How new revenue streams are paying off for WVU athletics