Derek Anderson is right

Status
Not open for further replies.

TortElvisII

Heisman
May 7, 2010
51,700
96,942
66
they lost to Detroit -Mercy in the MCC tournament
then they lost in the first round of the NCAAT to VTech

do not try to act like they were some great team
the 96 team should have blown them out

you make this too easy
Had they beat Virginia Tech they would have had to play Kentucky again. I can understand them losing.
 

TortElvisII

Heisman
May 7, 2010
51,700
96,942
66
they lost to Detroit -Mercy in the MCC tournament
then they lost in the first round of the NCAAT to VTech

do not try to act like they were some great team
the 96 team should have blown them out

you make this too easy
By the way what should the 2018 team have done to Kansas State? The 2019 team to Auburn?

You really make this easy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kywildcat41086

mebeblue2

Heisman
Dec 20, 2009
98,152
10,574
0
Anyone here who takes shots at DA over this tweet, you tell me all I need to know about what type of Kentucky fan you are.
what does it say about DA taking a shot at Cal and this team?

at the very least his post was in very poor taste

how i feel about him taking a shot at Cal and this years team tells you that i am the type of fan that sees no reason to do something like that
 

mebeblue2

Heisman
Dec 20, 2009
98,152
10,574
0
By the way what should the 2018 team have done to Kansas State? The 2019 team to Auburn?

You really make this easy.
if you remember before the NCAAT most fans did not have high hopes for the 2018 team
the hope came after top teams started falling

keeps spinning you only make it easier
 

STL_Cat

Heisman
Dec 4, 2011
64,968
57,828
98
what does it say about DA taking a shot at Cal and this team?

at the very least his post was in very poor taste

how i feel about him taking a shot at Cal and this years team tells you that i am the type of fan that sees no reason to do something like that
It’s your choice if you decide to take what he said in that way. I didn’t see one word in that post about Cal or this UK team.

maybe you’re just paranoid
 
Jul 9, 2004
93,075
38,060
0
He's not pointing out some unnamed coach, he literally asked does ANY coach do it. He's talking about today's game as a whole. I agree with him.

Exactly. End of thread.

How many P5 teams are playing other P5 teams nowadays and scoring 60 points in a half let alone 70 or even 80. Hell, most teams aren't even putting up 50 points in halves.....against any team. Not even K, Self, Drew, or Oats' teams are having those types of halves other than occasionally.


Look at today https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/scoreboard/_/group/50

Only 7 teams scored more points in a game today than Kentucky. 1 of those was against a D-2. 1 game was a barn burner where the final score ended up being 96-93. The game isn't the same as back then.

Kentucky has scored over 90 points 5 times in their 15 games.


Remember earlier this year when Gonzaga and Duke played? Neither team had 50 at half. Neither team was even close to 100 at the end of the game. Hell, at halftime, both teams had 1 more point than UK had in that 1st half. Those are 2 teams that love offense(especially Gonzaga).

There haven't been many teams better than that UK team in the history of the game.
 

mebeblue2

Heisman
Dec 20, 2009
98,152
10,574
0
It’s your choice if you decide to take what he said in that way. I didn’t see one word in that post about Cal or this UK team.

maybe you’re just paranoid
he posts that after the lose to LSU and calls out the handoff which this team and Cal teaches/uses

not paranoid, just calling it for what it is
i am not naive

the 96 team played a balls to the wall style
that is what allowed them to score 86 in a half
it is also what caused them to give up 99 to a school like Marshal

as i stated at the very least it was in poor taste (i think you can agree with that)
still not as bad as what Rex did
 

STL_Cat

Heisman
Dec 4, 2011
64,968
57,828
98
he posts that after the lose to LSU and calls out the handoff which this team and Cal teaches/uses

not paranoid, just calling it for what it is
i am not naive

the 96 team played a balls to the wall style
that is what allowed them to score 86 in a half
it is also what caused them to give up 99 to a school like Marshal

as i stated at the very least it was in poor taste (i think you can agree with that)
still not as bad as what Rex did
I’m not paranoid and DA is a UK legend who is absolutely entitled to state his thoughts on the state of college basketball.
 
Last edited:

TortElvisII

Heisman
May 7, 2010
51,700
96,942
66
We have a guy in this thread taking a shot at the 96 team for only beating a team that had a 23-game winning streak by 12 points. What would you say about our victory over Georgia tonight? It was 15 points. The 96 team absolutely obliterated numerous opponents. Some of you need to put your cal love second to the University of Kentucky.
 

mebeblue2

Heisman
Dec 20, 2009
98,152
10,574
0
I’m not paranoid and DA is a UK legend who is absolutely entitled to state his thoughts on the state of college basketball.
i totally agree
that does not change the fact that it was at the very least in bad taste

i know he is a fan just like the rest of us
had he posted that two weeks ago then it would have been viewed as an innocent post
but his timing was with intent
 

GoBigBlue1224

All-Conference
Jan 19, 2020
1,013
1,504
65
The 1996 team is my favorite team of all time. The 2015 team is my 2nd favorite team of all time. Even though the 2015 team came up short, I don’t think the 96 team would win that battle. I think that 2015 team is the greatest college basketball team of all time. If those guys could have played 3/4 years together like 96, I’d say they maybe loose a total of 4 games in 4 years. Maybe! That was a collection of depth and talent we will never see again. But man oh man I’d give dang near anything to see some of those battles. Someone create a time machine! We can throw in the 2012 team as well!

On a side note, my buddy brought me an autographed poster from the 1998 game against Duke. The picture is of Cameron Mills hitting the go ahead 3. Jeff Sheppard and Cameron both autographed it. Not sure if those guys get on and read the board, I would if I was them, but thanks gentleman!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManitouDan

Lempface

Heisman
Feb 16, 2009
12,159
20,638
98
Does he know UK has #1 scoring offense in SEC? Yeah, even more than Nate Oates.
 

LowCountryCat

Heisman
Apr 17, 2010
117,188
22,769
0
Umm… Cawood retired in 1992, four years before that game was played.
 

king of cali

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2005
6,955
3,877
0
Nobody in this thread has been able to criticize DA's statement on the merits. They just attack him personally.
Plenty of people have went at what Anderson said on its merits. It’s just that it gets ignored. So yes, they scored 86 points in the first half and it was beautiful to watch, but without looking at a box score I’m willing to bet a great deal of that was generated from their defense, not because they ran some great sets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ukbrassowtipin

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
47,682
71,030
113
Umm… Cawood retired in 1992, four years before that game was played.
Good grief. I promise I’m not on drugs. Ugh. Don’t know where my mind has been the week. Rough freaking week at work.
 

Ukbrassowtipin

Heisman
Aug 12, 2011
82,240
90,175
113
Nobody in this thread has been able to criticize DA's statement on the merits. They just attack him personally.
Lsu had 31 turnovers...maybe that had something to do with it.

If you've ever paid attention to this board ppl are always on flavor of the week.

If a team presses and wins...why don't we do that.

Wheres the shooters

Wheres the upperclassmen

Wheres this, we need this, why doesn't he do this.

Literally anything any team does that wins that's what we are missing and it will change depending on whoever is winning across the country sometimes by the week.
 

LowCountryCat

Heisman
Apr 17, 2010
117,188
22,769
0
Plenty of people have went at what Anderson said on its merits. It’s just that it gets ignored. So yes, they scored 86 points in the first half and it was beautiful to watch, but without looking at a box score I’m willing to bet a great deal of that was generated from their defense, not because they ran some great sets.
You're 'willing to bet?' Are you saying you've never even watched that game on youtube? Jeesh.

Yes there were a lot of turnovers but also a lot of passes from the outside to the inside for easy layups. The court vision of that team was incredible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cowtown Cat

LowCountryCat

Heisman
Apr 17, 2010
117,188
22,769
0
Lsu had 31 turnovers...maybe that had something to do with it.

If you've ever paid attention to this board ppl are always on flavor of the week.

If a team presses and wins...why don't we do that.

Wheres the shooters

Wheres the upperclassmen

Wheres this, we need this, why doesn't he do this.

Literally anything any team does that wins that's what we are missing and it will change depending on whoever is winning across the country sometimes by the week.
Good points, but that raises even more questions, like why Cal doesn't change things up when something's not working.

Why does he NEVER run a zone when it's so obviously called for? Why does he NEVER press? These kinds of things can be changed ON THE FLY by a competent coach. Look what Huggins did to Cal in 2010, shifted to a 1-3-1 and Cal's brain exploded, gray matter all over the court and we lost. That team should have gone the distance. Why doesn't Cal EVER draw up any more out of bounds plays? We know he knows how to do it, because he bragged before the SS game against IU to Crean that he had drawn up two new OB plays before the game.
 

king of cali

All-Conference
Nov 24, 2005
6,955
3,877
0
You're 'willing to bet?' Are you saying you've never even watched that game on youtube? Jeesh.

Yes there were a lot of turnovers but also a lot of passes from the outside to the inside for easy layups. The court vision of that team was incredible.
Sorry, but I have a lot better things to do with my time than rewatch games from nearly 30 years ago.

UKs offense in those days was fueled by its defense. It wasn’t because Pitino designed some brilliant offensive sets. The 86 point half was an anomaly, not the norm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kl40504_rivals
Status
Not open for further replies.