NAME , IMAGE, LIKENESS

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
It really comes down to the fact that a bunch of old white dudes don't like a bunch of young black dudes charging for their autograph. It is felt that because they get a college scholarship they should put up with a bunch of fans wanting them to do what the fans want them to do and allow everyone around them to get rich while they don't have any money, with the promise that if you work hard and make it, you'll have money. The kids with scholarships in the engineering program would not put up with that.
Thats absurd and offensive
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
I don’t think there is any proposed scenario where schools can “purchase” players. This is about autograph signings, sponsorships, tv commercials, etc. There will be protocols everyone has to follow. You may suspect schools will find a way to game the system but that’s a hypothetical and that’s a waste of time at this point.

we are going around in circles. Of course the kids don’t have to join the club, that’s not the point. The point is the club needs to change its rules.
That’s a bad take. Schools will dangle all kinds of opportunities to make money in front of high school kids faces to get them to commit. “Steve over there at the Ford dealership is an alum. He’s been known to pay guys 20 grand to appear in a commercial and do autograph sessions.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: gojvc

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
I don’t think there is any proposed scenario where schools can “purchase” players. This is about autograph signings, sponsorships, tv commercials, etc. There will be protocols everyone has to follow. You may suspect schools will find a way to game the system but that’s a hypothetical and that’s a waste of time at this point.

we are going around in circles. Of course the kids don’t have to join the club, that’s not the point. The point is the club needs to change its rules.
This is exactly the sort of ignorance that will make this fraught with a level of corruption not seen since the days of gambling influence and mob involvement. You are doing nothing more than rationalization of professional college sports. They have options to get paid. They are compensated in college already with room, meals and an education.

There is no ethical or moral underpinning for this. The hand wringing that this will somehow dilute the ranks of college basketball is simply crap. The kids in question here are the same one and done players that are itching to leave anyway. We have fans crying about these player’s already.

There is a comedy here. Wait till the Title IX cadre get their mitts into this. It won’t be the most athletic women, but the most beautiful that are marketable. Talk about corruption and a recipe for abuse. International gymnastics and swimming are already reeling from this.

This is the single worst idea in the history of college athletics. It will end the game you know today. It will be replaced by a substandard G-League full of corruption. This league’s players will be 10 fold more focused on payment than playing. Utter stupIdity, but typical of the corrupt and incompetent NCAA.
 

gojvc

All-American
Feb 5, 2005
28,744
7,273
0
Is there anything else in this country that makes a profit and the people who actually do the job don't make any money?
Profit? There probably weren’t a dozen athletic departments in the country operating at a profit pre-Covid. I doubt there’s any now.
 

Rockfly78

Heisman
Nov 20, 2014
7,927
10,877
0
That’s a bad take. Schools will dangle all kinds of opportunities to make money in front of high school kids faces to get them to commit. “Steve over there at the Ford dealership is an alum. He’s been known to pay guys 20 grand to appear in a commercial and do autograph sessions.”
Oh I’m not naive at all. I know this stuff will happen. As a matter of fact I think Kentucky will benefit and that’s appealing to me. They will write the rules in a way that will hopefully prevent schools from outright buying players. After that it will be the Wild West

My main argument is that I don’t like an institution telling its members they can’t make a living.
 

Dore95

All-Conference
Mar 2, 2008
2,435
1,906
0
ESPN had an article last week (can't find it now) about the immigration law issues associated with foreign players and NIL. Basically, a foreign student here on a student (F-1) visa cannot earn income unless its through on campus part-time work (i.e., working at the school bookstore or cafeteria). This means that foreign players cannot make money through NIL and maintain their student visa.

The ESPN article portrayed this is an issue that no one (NCAA, various state legislatures that have passed NIL laws, etc.) had considered. Federal immigration law would have to be amended to fix this.

To me, this shows the lack of foresight with NIL. As some have pointed out in this thread, you're going to have all sorts of people pushing the envelope to use NIL to buy players in ways that the idealistic people who pushed this rule change did not consider.
 

Dablueman

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
16,981
5,703
0
But that can happen anywhere. What made UK special, the deep passion most of the state had for the program, will become insignificant. It doesn't pay well.
Well my point was that it will help negate Kentucky being a poor state. It levels the financial playing field so to speak not to mention that most states with bigger metropolitan areas in the states with more money involved have more than 2 power five schools and multiple pro teams to spread that money around. By your handle I am assuming you live in Georgia now. A kid going to Georgia will have to compete not only with kids going to Georgia Tech but with the Falcons, Hawks and Braves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucsrule8872

Dablueman

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
16,981
5,703
0
Yes, I'm ok with that. Get rid of the OAD's and basketball will be better for it.
I disagree this isn't like it was last time kids could go directly to the NBA. There will be more and more paying options that come along more and more money available. As the talent level lowers so will casual viewership and college basketball will start to look less and less attractive to players, but if you are cool with the talent level being down then you have a right to that opinion.
 

bucsrule8872

Heisman
May 30, 2005
24,397
29,352
0
Well my point was that it will help negate Kentucky being a poor state. It levels the financial playing field so to speak not to mention that most states with bigger metropolitan areas in the states with more money involved have more than 2 power five schools and multiple pro teams to spread that money around. By your handle I am assuming you live in Georgia now. A kid going to Georgia will have to compete not only with kids going to Georgia Tech but with the Falcons, Hawks and Braves.
This is why I think Miami would be a poor choice for Duren. College basketball in Miami is waaaay down the list. Dolphins, Heat, and Marlins plus Hurricanes, Gators, and Seminoles football all outrank Hurricanes basketball. Heck, Gators and Seminoles basketball probably outranks Hurricanes basketball. Maybe even college baseball and minor league baseball are more popular than Canes basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dablueman

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Well my point was that it will help negate Kentucky being a poor state. It levels the financial playing field so to speak not to mention that most states with bigger metropolitan areas in the states with more money involved have more than 2 power five schools and multiple pro teams to spread that money around. By your handle I am assuming you live in Georgia now. A kid going to Georgia will have to compete not only with kids going to Georgia Tech but with the Falcons, Hawks and Braves.
I understand your point. Georgia Tech has almost zero following here. UGA will really benefit from NIL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bthaunert

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
I disagree this isn't like it was last time kids could go directly to the NBA. There will be more and more paying options that come along more and more money available. As the talent level lowers so will casual viewership and college basketball will start to look less and less attractive to players, but if you are cool with the talent level being down then you have a right to that opinion.
I'm not convinced that any other pro league will have decent viewership. No one watches the G League now and it has direct NBA support and connections. Even fewer people will watch the other fad leagues that pop up then disappear.
 
  • Love
Reactions: KFuqua

Dablueman

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
16,981
5,703
0
This is why I think Miami would be a poor choice for Duren. College basketball in Miami is waaaay down the list. Dolphins, Heat, and Marlins plus Hurricanes, Gators, and Seminoles football all outrank Hurricanes basketball. Heck, Gators and Seminoles basketball probably outranks Hurricanes basketball. Maybe even college baseball and minor league baseball are more popular than Canes basketball.
I agree! I think the whole reclass thing is to be able to enter the draft a year earlier it makes perfect sense better to play college ball them to play another season to high school ball. I do understand that Miami hired someone he is close to but if this is all business then Uk does make more sense.
 

Dablueman

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
16,981
5,703
0
I'm not convinced that any other pro league will have decent viewership. No one watches the G League now and it has direct NBA support and connections. Even fewer people will watch the other fad leagues that pop up then disappear.
Does minor league baseball have decent viewership? We could eventually see basketball evolve into a class system of minor league where there is 1 to 3A leagues to pilfer high school players. We could see the foreign pros get more aggressive. To be honest my friend I don't like it either I hate that it is messing with the purity of the sport. I just see the direction that it is headed in my opinion. I truly hope I am wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ruppcat

ruppcat

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
3,698
5,185
0
They are paid, they get an education, free room and board, excellent medical care and a stipend to live off because their responsibilities as an athlete prevent them from getting a regular job like many college students do. The rest of the revenue generated goes back into the school, mainly to support the 95% of sports that operate at a loss. But we don't feel those sports should be disbanded at the collegiate level, because we recognize the value that they bring beyond money. The only people getting rich are the coaches, and they deserve it. There's no CEO of college sports giving himself bonuses or whatever.

And that's not even the issue at hand, it's whether to allow athletes to seek out endorsements and other revenue streams based on their status as a student athlete. In theory, this seems fine, but it should only take you a few seconds to realize the absolute pandora's box of issues this would cause. From day 1, boosters are now directly paying players and recruits. Money is now the sole reason almost any highly regarded football or basketball player picks a school. As the NCAA had pointed out, this strikes at the heart of what makes college sports enjoyable for many fans. This may seem "unfair", but no one is required to play college sports.
And what no one seems to be talking about is Title IX.

You think there's fussing in the country today about so called unequal pay.....just wait until the women's swim team or equestrian team realizes practically no one really cares about their sport in that they're not going to pony up big bucks for their images.

The other issue this is going to cause is resentment on the team. Which kid isn't going to try and play above himself to keep his name on the billboard or car commercial?

Or....what if the car dealer or whoever says to the kid....I'll pay you $$$ to only score x number of points......don't think it won't happen.

Now think about coaching these kids. Kid's getting $500k for use of his likeness.....is he really going to listen to the coach?? I see it the attitude in the pros.....it's going to cause problems.
 

ruppcat

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
3,698
5,185
0
Things changed for me when the SEC signed a $2 billion deal for television rights in 2008 and then just signed a new $3 billion deal this past year. Universities are getting $50+ million a year from these deals. Seems like if the University can make that kind of money off these kids playing sports, then the student athlete should be able to make money too.

With that said, this is going to be a complete disaster.
How much does it cost to run a program?

An athletic department? The women's sports that don't make a dime for the school....same for the men's that don't.

It's football and men's basketball that pays the bills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: westerncat

ruppcat

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
3,698
5,185
0
Stipends aren't exactly good, kids go hungry all the time. Medical is iffy because other than about 8 schools, no one is offering a full 4 year scholarship. So if you tear a acl at let's say South Carolina, they can throw you away. Guys deserve a cut when sponsors are willing to pay because what happens when they get a career ending injury and never get the pro deal? They at least got a decent start with endorsements
No kid in sports is going hungry. NO way.

IF a school "throws" away players as you suggest, don't you think that'll come up in recruiting?? Go to such and such school, get hurt and your toast?
 

ruppcat

All-American
Jan 1, 2003
3,698
5,185
0
Almost all of it to some degree. D1 players have access to unlimited food on campus. That has been the case for a while but should have always been the case.

The stipends are fine.

Why would you claim "medical" is iffy except at about 8 schools? That makes no sense.

Its rare that scholarships are canceled due to injury but I agree, it should never happen.

While I understand why a school can pull a scholarship, it should never happen due to injury and should be very rare otherwise. The schools should be required to find the player an adequate scholarship elsewhere or honor it until the player runs out of eligibility.

A cut of what exactly? Revenue sharing us a horrible idea.
I listen to a lot of sports radio. Not ONCE have I heard any former player complaining about going hungry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TIE543

so_obvious

All-Conference
May 26, 2017
1,683
3,107
0
Can you imagine the entitlement of players 5-10 years from now? You think these dudes are head-cases now just wait.

NBA going to have 10 different drama channels committed to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ruppcat and KFuqua

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
And what no one seems to be talking about is Title IX.

You think there's fussing in the country today about so called unequal pay.....just wait until the women's swim team or equestrian team realizes practically no one really cares about their sport in that they're not going to pony up big bucks for their images.

The other issue this is going to cause is resentment on the team. Which kid isn't going to try and play above himself to keep his name on the billboard or car commercial?

Or....what if the car dealer or whoever says to the kid....I'll pay you $$$ to only score x number of points......don't think it won't happen.

Now think about coaching these kids. Kid's getting $500k for use of his likeness.....is he really going to listen to the coach?? I see it the attitude in the pros.....it's going to cause problems.
No one is talking about Title IX because it doesn’t violate it. As long as all athletes are given equal opportunity with NIL, then it’s fine. And they will be given equal opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dakid_0812

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
How much does it cost to run a program?

An athletic department? The women's sports that don't make a dime for the school....same for the men's that don't.

It's football and men's basketball that pays the bills.
What’s the point?
 

so_obvious

All-Conference
May 26, 2017
1,683
3,107
0
No one is talking about Title IX because it doesn’t violate it. As long as all athletes are given equal opportunity with NIL, then it’s fine. And they will be given equal opportunity.

Equal opportunity is never going to be a thing in a ‘victims’ society. And unfortunately that is where we are today.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Does minor league baseball have decent viewership? We could eventually see basketball evolve into a class system of minor league where there is 1 to 3A leagues to pilfer high school players. We could see the foreign pros get more aggressive. To be honest my friend I don't like it either I hate that it is messing with the purity of the sport. I just see the direction that it is headed in my opinion. I truly hope I am wrong.
No, not really, it doesn't. A and AA salaries are terrible and the average AAA isn't good. These basketball kids are expecting much more in general. Not to mention the MLB association helps the minor leagues with fans and salary support. The G League is roughly similar but any other leagues that pop up will just die in a couple years. Just my opinion.
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
Equal opportunity is never going to be a thing in a ‘victims’ society. And unfortunately that is where we are today.
But it doesn’t violate Title IX. So, while some might complain, it doesn’t matter because it’s not a Title IX issue. In fact, the ones that are going to make the most are attractive female athletes we have never heard of with tons of followers on social media.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
No kid in sports is going hungry. NO way.

IF a school "throws" away players as you suggest, don't you think that'll come up in recruiting?? Go to such and such school, get hurt and your toast?
Yes. It would require both a head coach and AD to be heartless fools.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
But it doesn’t violate Title IX. So, while some might complain, it doesn’t matter because it’s not a Title IX issue. In fact, the ones that are going to make the most are attractive female athletes we have never heard of with tons of followers on social media.
I don't think Title IX is the explicit issue. Its the thought process that led to Title IX that will come to play again. At some point, inequality and entitlement will enter this situation.
 

Justwar

All-American
Jan 19, 2002
30,175
5,821
113
Yes. It would require both a head coach and AD to be heartless fools.
You'd be surprised. Especially in your bigger football programs and basketball guys are afraid to speak up because of how influential the coach and school is to there future. People can believe or not, but it came from a top player at another school
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
I don't think Title IX is the explicit issue. Its the thought process that led to Title IX that will come to play again. At some point, inequality and entitlement will enter this situation.
Title IX was developed to prevent discrimination based on ones sex for any education program or school that receives federal funding. I would disagree that it’s a bad thought process. And I still don’t think that “thought process” will come into play here. It doesn’t come into play in professional sports for advertising and endorsements.
 
May 31, 2018
15,280
30,690
98
This is the single worst idea in the history of college athletics. It will end the game you know today. It will be replaced by a substandard G-League full of corruption. This league’s players will be 10 fold more focused on payment than playing. Utter stupIdity, but typical of the corrupt and incompetent NCAA.
Don't forget that the corrupt and incompetent government is now involved too.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
Title IX was developed to prevent discrimination based on ones sex for any education program or school that receives federal funding. I would disagree that it’s a bad thought process. And I still don’t think that “thought process” will come into play here. It doesn’t come into play in professional sports for advertising and endorsements.
The feds are involved. Of course that ideology will become involved and of course it it will make thing even worse..
 

bthaunert

Heisman
Apr 4, 2007
29,518
21,619
0
The feds are involved. Of course that ideology will become involved and of course it it will make thing even worse..
We will disagree on this one. 18 states have already signed the NIL into law and none of them have anything about Title IX or making sure that female athletes make as much money as male athletes. None of it. Even California. All it states is that college athletes have the right to earn money from their name, image and likeness.

And the Feds had to get involved because the damn NCAA drug their feet hoping this would just go away. Had they been proactive instead of reactive, we wouldn't be in this mess.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
You'd be surprised. Especially in your bigger football programs and basketball guys are afraid to speak up because of how influential the coach and school is to there future. People can believe or not, but it came from a top player at another school
It is extremely rare but apparently you have some validation of it so speak up.
 

kybassfan

Heisman
Jul 1, 2005
20,032
16,368
113
We will disagree on this one. 18 states have already signed the NIL into law and none of them have anything about Title IX or making sure that female athletes make as much money as male athletes. None of it. Even California. All it states is that college athletes have the right to earn money from their name, image and likeness.

And the Feds had to get involved because the damn NCAA drug their feet hoping this would just go away. Had they been proactive instead of reactive, we wouldn't be in this mess.
I remember this about you. The words foresight and extrapolate are lost on you. These effects don’t happen day 1. These things develop over time. Everyone will want a slice of the pie. They will cheat and legislate to get it.
 

Bluedog1

Senior
Jan 4, 2012
758
777
93
Then I suggest investing in a local D2 or D3 school. Talent is still good and everything you described still applies there. As for D1 and Kentucky it’s a business now. If you want Kentucky to keep being Kentucky then this has to happen and happen ASAP or we will be left behind and so will college basketball as a whole.

I have been a UK fan for 50 years now and a season ticket holder for 27 - I am not going to stop being a fan BUT i dont have to like some of this stuff and I dont.
 

Bluedog1

Senior
Jan 4, 2012
758
777
93
They are paid, they get an education, free room and board, excellent medical care and a stipend to live off because their responsibilities as an athlete prevent them from getting a regular job like many college students do. The rest of the revenue generated goes back into the school, mainly to support the 95% of sports that operate at a loss. But we don't feel those sports should be disbanded at the collegiate level, because we recognize the value that they bring beyond money. The only people getting rich are the coaches, and they deserve it. There's no CEO of college sports giving himself bonuses or whatever.

And that's not even the issue at hand, it's whether to allow athletes to seek out endorsements and other revenue streams based on their status as a student athlete. In theory, this seems fine, but it should only take you a few seconds to realize the absolute pandora's box of issues this would cause. From day 1, boosters are now directly paying players and recruits. Money is now the sole reason almost any highly regarded football or basketball player picks a school. As the NCAA had pointed out, this strikes at the heart of what makes college sports enjoyable for many fans. This may seem "unfair", but no one is required to play college sports.
great points
 

Bluedog1

Senior
Jan 4, 2012
758
777
93
It's completely fair to say you don't like, I don't either. I also acknowledge it's fair that they do get paid. I wish it was still kids playing for the love of the game but sports is a business now. It just is.
I agree with everything you said. I guess I am just mourning the old days OR the perception of the old days.
 

BigBlueFanGA

Heisman
Jun 14, 2005
26,435
23,456
0
Emmerts letter to member schools is the end of amateur sports. The flood gates are open. The beginning of the end is here.