This sort of thing is not mere "back and forth" between two people:
During the preliminary hearing, Det. Winters testified that the accuser had been examined the day after the alleged assault by Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANE) at the Valley View Hospital in Glenwood Springs, Colorado.
“[The nurse] stated that there were several lacerations to the victim’s posterior fourchette or vaginal area, and two of those lacerations were approximately one centimeter in length,” testified Det. Winters. “And there were many, I believe, 2 millimeter lacerations. Too many to count… [The nurse] stated that the injuries were consistent with penetrating genital trauma. That it’s not consistent with consensual sex.”
Det. Winters further stated that the nurse told him the vaginal injuries had most likely occurred within “24 hours,” and that the accuser had “bruises on her left jaw line.” Also, that examiners had found “blood excretions” on Bryant’s T-shirt “to about the waistline.” The blood, testified Det. Winters, had “the same DNA profile as the victim in this case.”
How do you explain away that? I'm sorry, but the "well, maybe she liked it rough..." excuse ain't adequate to cover "to many to count" lacerations consistent with non-consensual traumatic genital penetration.
And it's also worth noting that only one side maintained a consistent story, whereas Kobe kept changing his. When he was first interviewed by police, he lied his *** off and claimed he didn't have sex with her at all, only changing his story after learning they had his DNA samples. Then he claims he didn't ejaculate, only to later adjust that after learning they had his ***** sample. His story was all over the place.
I know we all like Kobe and want him to be innocent but, you know, sometimes you've just got to take your head out of the sand regarding things you don't want to be true.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/kobe-...ce-the-accusers-story-and-the-half-confession