When did you whine to them? I would hate to make your ***** *** go cry to ddd manboobs to come save your honor again.
Yes, spying did occur
- Thread starter TarHeelEer
- Start date
Last edited:
He didn’t plead the 5th. Innocent people aren’t subject to interrogation without evidence of a crime.
It’s basically like:
Police: “we’d like to have a chat with you”.
Suspect: “certainly, you can speak with my attorneys”
Attorney: “my client has nothing to say. Are you charging him with a crime?”
Police: “no, we don’t have evidence of a crime, we really want to entrap him into an obstruction charge”
Attorney: “good day gentlemen”
Police: “****”.
Exactly! If that FISA warrant was bogus (it was) what was the reason to spy on Trump? We've never been told, that's what Barr wants to know because if the reason was as bogus as that fake dossier...it's all a crime.
Lock 'em all up!
So....if they weren't "spying" on the Trump campaign...20 questions "why"?
- why the fake dossier to the FISA court?
- why was nothing else we know of presented to the court?
- why did they attempt to plant "informants"?
- why were innocent names "unmasked"?
- why was Trump kept uninformed?
- why were FISA warrants requested four times?
- why was the FBI involved and not the NSA?
- why was the eavesdropping denied?
- why was it covered up?
- why was the FISA court never told of everyone involved?
- why wasn't Congress kept informed?
- why weren't results of the surveillance made known?
- why the refusals to call it "spying"?
- why is the purpose of it still a mystery?
- why do we not know who ordered it?
- why were only anti-Trump haters involved?
- why was it done only after Trump was nominated?
- why was no one else outside the Trump campaign targeted?
- why was it even necessary?
- why are they STILL lying about it?
This cartoon pretty much sums it up with Barr and what he is there to do.
https://www.ajc.com/blog/luckovich/mike-luckovich-trump-fixer/iQ7WKjogerH23uFtVyzKrO/
https://www.ajc.com/blog/luckovich/mike-luckovich-trump-fixer/iQ7WKjogerH23uFtVyzKrO/
Hahaha talk about conspiracy theories. Shedding light on what occurred is not a bad thing.This cartoon pretty much sums it up with Barr and what he is there to do.
https://www.ajc.com/blog/luckovich/mike-luckovich-trump-fixer/iQ7WKjogerH23uFtVyzKrO/
Attorney General and all others in responsible positions that is responsible for the law shouldn't play a political card on the behalf of the president. They need to act and speak responsibly. But since you and others are Trump *** suckers, carry on.
Looking through your Trump rose colored glasses, you don't see well. We know.
AG doesn't testify "I think". He needs to speak (if able) in black and white. You don't or can't present evidence to back up discussion points, you don't talk. He shouldn't give opinions whether it is in his testimony or written statements like that worthless letter.
Expected. Go back to your conspiracy sites and don't worry about adult conversations.
In the question he responded to....do you think spying occured . His response I think so. Go eat dirt.
And he should have answered "it isn't the responsibility of the AG to give personal opinions on such subjects". Eat a pile of ****, Trumper, and STFU
If I’d been in denial for the last 2.5 years, completely ignored all testimony that’s occurred, closed my eyes to the entirety of the headshed at the FBI and numerous DOJ officials being shitcanned, had the Mueller investigation pee down it’s leg, ignored the ongoing Grand Jury and multiple investigations occurring into the spying, and viewed the situation through a completely partisan lenses clouded by hatred of the current administration, I’d be able to see your point and agree that’s the way he should’ve answered.
Everything Barr has said so far about the Mueller report has been a drive by, just lobbing **** out there for the Trump devotees to latch on to while not providing anything to back up his comments. The "spying" thing yesterday was a classic example, just lob a bomb with nothing to back it up so that the Trumpsters could run with it. Pathetic. Enough with Barr's version of events, just put the damn report out there.
Lol.
Is Barr a Foxnews hack or a message board conspiracy troll or is he in fact the AG with a very high level of responsibility to the country?
He's entitled to give an opinion when asked the question. Stop it with the talking point ********.
Really? Laws are based on giving opinions.
His accusations in a formal setting as the AG is a little heavier than you morons are spinning it in order to be partisan. I assure you if you were the least bit objective, you would view it differently. But you aren't so carry on.
LOL!
Now do Clapper and Brennan statements about Trump in their media positions now. You want the guilty to go to jail, right? Me too.
Laws are based on opinions. Laws weren't enforced by the prior administration because of opinion. Where was your faux outrage then?
But keep your spin... you non-partisan saint you.
Aren't those two out of government?
But yes, if acted improperly they need to be accountable. Same with anyone.
My comments on current affairs are consistent. You being a partisan view things differently. No doubt.
Then what's wrong with Barr's statement? FISC is a warrant to spy. I don't get what you libs are so worked up about.
Do you honestly think you’re unbiased, objective, and non-partisan? Like, you honestly believe that?
I'm not unbiased. No one is. I have partisan beliefs on certain policies. On current affairs, yes I attempt to discuss in an objective, fair and honest perspective not giving a **** who might get pissed about my comments.
Clear?
Let me get this straight...we went to a FISA court to place innocent Americans under surveillance based on what we "thought" about a fake dossier and Foreign infiltration of an American political campaign correct?
However since we now know there was no "collusion" with Foreigners or "obstruction" of those efforts looking into into it, we now can't investigate if we "think" the whole thing was a rigged conspiracy designed to undermine a duly elected President by our own people?
Got it.
