Are we finding a coach that equals/exceeds Cal's records at UMass/Memphis or UK? Keep in mind, Cal struggled at UMass and Memphis most seasons. His experience at UK has been different, do you know why?
UK give these coaches a huge advantage. It’s unfair to compare what a coach did at Texas Tech to what Cal has done at UK. No, you need to compare what Beard has accomplished at TT to what Cal did at Memphis.
Beard (not my choice, just an example) could come in here and kill it. This ain't Texas Tech.
Lol, in 8 seasons in Umass, Cal had 20+ wins 6 times and made the NCAA all of his last 5 seasons. In Memphis, he won 20+ games every season. Won over 30 his last 4 years. He won an NIT championship his second year, and won his conference 7 out of his 9 years. His last 4 seasons they only lost 1 conference game total. You must have an unusual definition for struggled most seasons.
He has actually maintained a relatively stable record his entire college coaching career.
It's not unfair at all. If a coach is only having average to slightly above average success at a smaller school with no real pressure, why would you expect him to be successful here suddenly? If Cal, who is one of the best recruiters in the game, can't land the top notch kids anymore, why would Beard? If we go with the approach of building deep, long-term rosters, why is he resorting to a lot of grad transfera at TT? Last year they wouldn't have even made the tournament. In 4 full seasons, they have lost 10+ losses 3 times. None of that really indicates a degree of success necessary for this job. It is worse than what we have had during the same time-frame