Who would you rather

Who would you rather have as the UK Coach in there prime?


  • Total voters
    0
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
Rupp built a dynasty. But it's questionable about how well he sustained it (59-73).
Pitino, not on the list, did a quick re-build/recovery, and had the personality to sustain it, but we'll never know if he would have.
Smith was consistently impressive, while not every "wow".
Knight was as good a coach as any on this list, but the personality was NOT one to sustain a dynasty.
Wooden, not on the list, did something that will never be repeated (w/ $$ support), but outside of those dozen years was just ok.
Jackson, great in pro's, when he had one of the 2-3 best in the game leading his team. No idea about college.
I voted for K. He both built (you could argue re-built) a dynasty, and he sustained it. He was actually who I wanted instead of Pitino in 88. Of course we all learned to hate him since then.
 

Yardeth

Heisman
Jan 2, 2007
13,372
17,540
67
You have Alford, Penny & Howard on the list, when most wouldn't put them in the top 50 coaches of all time. Yet you omit Wooden & Pitino?
I was going to say Alford, Penny and Howard combined would have been a Spectacular player, not so much as a coach. Might as well have BCG included with these chumps.
 
Apr 22, 2011
25,749
14,375
0
I mean in their PRIME?!

There is zero doubt it's Cal or Pitino.

We saw what both can do in their prime's with the keys to the kingdom.

Sadly Cal is not in his prime anymore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jont0805

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
47,615
70,830
113
If your answer is anything but Rupp, I don't know what to tell you.

Pitino or Cal is a close second, but Rupp won 4 titles and had a .800+ winning percentage.

If you get anyone in their prime, you take Rupp.
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
47,615
70,830
113
Rupp built a dynasty. But it's questionable about how well he sustained it (59-73).
Pitino, not on the list, did a quick re-build/recovery, and had the personality to sustain it, but we'll never know if he would have.
Smith was consistently impressive, while not every "wow".
Knight was as good a coach as any on this list, but the personality was NOT one to sustain a dynasty.
Wooden, not on the list, did something that will never be repeated (w/ $$ support), but outside of those dozen years was just ok.
Jackson, great in pro's, when he had one of the 2-3 best in the game leading his team. No idea about college.
I voted for K. He both built (you could argue re-built) a dynasty, and he sustained it. He was actually who I wanted instead of Pitino in 88. Of course we all learned to hate him since then.
K was as sleazy as they come and apparently a complete condescending *** off the court. Worse than Rick. At least Rick could feign politeness and charm. K is just a giant rat's d!(&

And take this from someone, even as a UK fan, used to admire him for his toughness and grit. Nah, he let his players act like overgrown toddlers. No thank you.
 
Apr 22, 2011
25,749
14,375
0
And yet in their prime they each only have 1 title.

Rupp had 4.

Okay but can we all admit that basketball was completely different back then? I mean black players didn't even play for the majority of Rupp's career.

The tournament had 8 teams in it.

Kentucky was one of the only places in the world that had some of their games televised.

It'd be like saying you'd take Oscar Robertson in his prime over Michael Jordan because he has more championships.

We can admit that basketball was just different back then.

I mean come on, what are we even talking about here?
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
47,615
70,830
113
Okay but can we all admit that basketball was completely different back then? I mean black players didn't even play for the majority of Rupp's career.

The tournament had 8 teams in it.

Kentucky was one of the only places in the world that had some of their games televised.

It'd be like saying you'd take Oscar Robertson in his prime over Michael Jordan because he has more championships.

We can admit that basketball was just different back then.

I mean come on, what are we even talking about here?
But was coaching? Perhaps so, but again, do you think Pitino or Cal could outcoach Rupp? On an x and o level?

That's highly highly debatable.
 

philstat

All-American
Jan 3, 2004
10,162
7,425
56
The Chosen One, Richard Pitino, AKA, Cal’s Daddy!
 
Last edited:
May 27, 2007
31,887
24,978
113
I mean if we are talking about in their PRIME Cal or Pitino.

The only reason I don't include Rupp in my answer is because I wasn't alive at that time. Obviously Rupp was great, it's just hard for me to compare him to Cal or Pitino.
 

Jumpercat

Senior
Jun 18, 2018
364
555
0
I just know Pitino in the 90’s and Cals first years here was a hell of a time being a uk basketball fan! Damn I miss those days!!
 

bbnkat02

Heisman
Nov 14, 2017
47,615
70,830
113
Sam Gilbert says howdy, here’s some cash. Walton said he took a pay cut when he went to the NBA.
Also apparently paid for player's "acquaintances" to have abortions.

Wooden was a fraud.
 
Jan 30, 2018
16,155
24,635
0
I'll take Pitino in his prime but he's not on the list. Took us from death penalty to title game 96, 97 and 98 (Tubby head man but Pitinos team). Plus the loved team of unforgetables. In his prime college BB was in fear of us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ruppcat

UKAlum88

All-Conference
Dec 1, 2020
1,432
2,352
0
I guess the people here choosing Pitino like winning only 1 championship. I like winning too much to be happy with RP’s resume.
 

Jacket4

Senior
Sep 18, 2008
499
586
0
As much as this board hates him, I think Coach K is the answer. Rupp dominated his era, K dominated multiple eras and was able to change his coaching style and philosophy as the times changed. Plus, no one can doubt he loved the school we worked for and would go to war for the school and players. Even late in his tenure his passion for winning never seemed to died down, unlike some others we know…