who really cares...

Rootmaster

Redshirt
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
if Will Grier and offensive tackle Yodny Cajuste are projected as late first round picks. Would rather see a team than a bunch of folks hoping to cash in off the investment made in their Free Education by hard working citizens of WV.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
Will Grier already graduated so no one in WV is paying for his education.

I believe Cajuste is a fifth year senior as well.
Not 100% sure on him.

Ultimately I believe both players have repaid their debt to the state.
 

eers-to-ya

Redshirt
Jun 8, 2008
4,003
42
0
if Will Grier and offensive tackle Yodny Cajuste are projected as late first round picks. Would rather see a team than a bunch of folks hoping to cash in off the investment made in their Free Education by hard working citizens of WV.
What an effing contrarian. Is there anything you're okay with? Guess WV should just give up scholarship football.
 

MountaineerWV

Sophomore
Sep 18, 2007
26,324
191
0
If these players want to start skipping bowl games, that's fine. But they should be forced to repay the cost of their education after graduating since they are "protecting their financial future". The university should also protect theirs.
 

Bubby2213

Redshirt
Dec 2, 2018
2
0
0
Then they should get a cut of the ticket sales and the millions of dollars in revenue that they make the university by playing football.
 
Aug 19, 2018
9,810
78
0
There are over one thousand ways to analyze any situation.

OP is 100% negative about WV.
Maybe because life didn't turn out the way he wanted. That is none of my business.

A win in the bowl game doesn't help WV nor will a loss hurt them.

Like I said before...getting a chance to get Allison snaps is the best thing for WV

So Grier sitting out is helping WV not hurting them.
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
I absolutely think that if a player sat out a CFP game voluntarily they should be financially punished.

But punishing someone who doesn’t want to play in a crappy for **** 3rd tier bowl against an equally for **** 3rd tier opponent? GTFO

Let the underclassmen get some reps in a glorified exhibition game.
 

DC_Mountaineer

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
42,278
1,787
0
I absolutely think that if a player sat out a CFP game voluntarily they should be financially punished..

And just how exactly? Are you going to fine them? They don't get paid and they are not employees (according to the NCAA). So, what exactly would you do to them?
 
May 29, 2001
20,973
78
0
Schools decide whether to play a player in a game.
Why don't players have the freedom to decide whether to risk injury in bowl or pursue an NFL career.
Grier has more than fulfilled his obligation to WVU. I would love to see Grier and Sills light up the Syracuse defense. But this America. We all have freedom of choice in employment opportunities.
 

DC_Mountaineer

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
42,278
1,787
0
if Will Grier and offensive tackle Yodny Cajuste are projected as late first round picks. Would rather see a team than a bunch of folks hoping to cash in off the investment made in their Free Education by hard working citizens of WV.


Ever had millions of dollars, life-changing money, dangled in front of you? If you haven't, then I don't think you have the room to criticize their decisions, whatever they may be.
 

Rootmaster

Redshirt
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
Schools decide whether to play a player in a game.
Why don't players have the freedom to decide whether to risk injury in bowl or pursue an NFL career.
Grier has more than fulfilled his obligation to WVU. I would love to see Grier and Sills light up the Syracuse defense. But this America. We all have freedom of choice in employment opportunities

1. Has nothing to do with who plays (and by the way coaches decide , schools don't). It has to do with scholarships and the cost of an education which student athletes get free.
2. Grier's obiligation to WVU ends when the season ends. In this case once the bowl game is over.
3. Freedom of choice in employment opportunity has nothing to do with it. It is about scholarship obligation.
4. If folks feel that students have a right to decide when they will play then schools should dump students who don't perform on the athletic field.
5. Although most think you can have it both ways. You can't.
 

Rootmaster

Redshirt
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
Ever had millions of dollars, life-changing money, dangled in front of you? If you haven't, then I don't think you have the room to criticize their decisions, whatever they may be.

They can quit anytime for any reason, but universities should have recourse for the expense and damages they incur. These are not exploited children but budding adults who enter into agreements.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
They can quit anytime for any reason, but universities should have recourse for the expense and damages they incur. These are not exploited children but budding adults who enter into agreements.

There are no damages.

If anything, you could only pull his scholarship which doesnt matter because he is graduating and done with football - hypothetically.

Dont you have any real problems to worry about? Only a bozo would be concerned over this. It is trivial and has no affect on your life.
 

DC_Mountaineer

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
42,278
1,787
0
They can quit anytime for any reason, but universities should have recourse for the expense and damages they incur. These are not exploited children but budding adults who enter into agreements.

I'll ask again....what recourse? What are you going to do to them? You got it half right. They are not children, but they are exploited. You are naive if you think otherwise.

And what damages is WVU suffering from if they don't play? If you are going to claim these things, then you should be able to cite examples.
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
And just how exactly? Are you going to fine them? They don't get paid and they are not employees (according to the NCAA). So, what exactly would you do to them?


Make them reimburse their last years scholarship money out of their NFL signing bonus. School would be dumb to not write that kind of stuff into their contract when they sign.
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
I'll ask again....what recourse? What are you going to do to them? You got it half right. They are not children, but they are exploited. You are naive if you think otherwise.

And what damages is WVU suffering from if they don't play? If you are going to claim these things, then you should be able to cite examples.


With the CFP at stake....merchandising alone would be millions.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
On 2nd thought this is a superb idea.

Give them a financial penalty for missing a single game, a SEVERE ONE. Then the NCAA and universities will be ON RECORD stating exactly how much value a player is worth in actual dollars, per game.

That would set an excellent precedent and be a wonderful tool during future battles with the NCAA over player compensation. It would be a thrill to have universities and the NCAA say on the record the formula they used to decide the financial penalty....that would he lovely.

Of course, wont happen because it is a bonehead idea.
 
Last edited:

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Make them reimburse their last years scholarship money out of their NFL signing bonus. School would be dumb to not write that kind of stuff into their contract when they sign.

A university has no authority to collect from a private citizens income, regardless of the source.

All you can do is dismiss them from the team.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
1. Has nothing to do with who plays (and by the way coaches decide , schools don't). It has to do with scholarships and the cost of an education which student athletes get free.
2. Grier's obiligation to WVU ends when the season ends. In this case once the bowl game is over.
3. Freedom of choice in employment opportunity has nothing to do with it. It is about scholarship obligation.
4. If folks feel that students have a right to decide when they will play then schools should dump students who don't perform on the athletic field.
5. Although most think you can have it both ways. You can't.

They do dump players who dont perform on the field, in all sorts of different ways.

They also dump students on academic scholarships who arent performing in the classroom.

But student athletes are free to quit the team whenever they wish.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Then do away with scholarships and make them actually qualify. Everyone wins lol.

I'm actually fine with this. Make the requirements for athletes the same as the students in general enrollment. GPA, SAT scores, ect. It is an absolute shame right now.
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
On 2nd thought this is a superb idea.

Give them a financial penalty for missing a single game, a SEVERE ONE. Then the NCAA and universities will be ON RECORD stating exactly how much value a player is worth in actual dollars, per game.

That would set an excellent precedent and be a wonderful tool during future battles with the NCAA over player compensation. It would be a thrill to have universities and the NCAA say on the record the formula they used to decide the financial penalty....that would he lovely.

Of course, wont happen because it is a bonehead idea.


Or better yet, pay the kids and build in a penalty if they skip an “important” (IMO NY6 or CFP) bowl game voluntarily. Simply put, they have to pay back the entire years’ scholarship out of their signing bonus.

If they are good enough to skip, they will be getting one.

I can’t voluntarily walk out on my job and still get paid...there are penalties. Welcome to the world of being an adult.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Contracts handle that

Only if you made them an employee and provided an income.

Even then you can't take future income. It would just be a fixed number, and universal for everyone not...not just players who might get drafted. You cant scale it based on subjective worth.

But then for it to be a deterent it would need to be unrealistically high to offset a 1st Round Pick salary, and if they tried that it would never be agreed.

This is all stupid but for discussion, you'd probaly need to end all scholarships, then provide a true salary to cover income + tuition then players actually pay the tuition then they could just withhold the money if they failed to play.

Doesnt matter, cant happen and never will happen.
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
Only if you made them an employee and provided an income.

Even then you can't take future income. It would just be a fixed number, and universal for everyone not...not just players who might get drafted. You cant scale it based on subjective worth.

But then for it to be a deterent it would need to be unrealistically high to offset a 1st Round Pick salary, and if they tried that it would never be agreed.

This is all stupid but for discussion, you'd probaly need to end all scholarships, then provide a true salary to cover income + tuition then players actually pay the tuition then they could just withhold the money if they failed to play.

Doesnt matter, cant happen and never will happen.


Or you could make it so it would have to be reimbursed within 6 months of breaking the contract. Then it’s up to them to decide how they want to pay it back. If not, it gets rolled over into the “student loan” collection basket...which is even worse.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Or better yet, pay the kids and build in a penalty if they skip an “important” (IMO NY6 or CFP) bowl game voluntarily. Simply put, they have to pay back the entire years’ scholarship out of their signing bonus.

If they are good enough to skip, they will be getting one.

I can’t voluntarily walk out on my job and still get paid...there are penalties. Welcome to the world of being an adult.

If you walk out of your job today, they stop paying you. They do not take your future income.

Besides, a years tution @ WVU is $25K, not likely to matter when you are looking at a 1st round salary.

Didnt Baker Mayfield get a $22 million sign on bonus?

This is incredibly stupid, and bitter - and jealous.
 
Last edited:

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Or you could make it so it would have to be reimbursed within 6 months of breaking the contract. Then it’s up to them to decide how they want to pay it back. If not, it gets rolled over into the “student loan” collection basket...which is even worse.

So if a player quits the team in the middle of the season, perhaps because his father died, or because he isnt playing, you think he owes the university a year of tuition money?

I assume you feel the way a student with an academic scholarship?

Lol you are nuts.
 

Rootmaster

Redshirt
Apr 16, 2011
9,238
31
0
Student athletes should be just that...student athletes. Discussing fair compensation for a bunch of jocks who are supposedly going to school is stupid. Eliminate scholarships and the emphasis on each new 18 year star. Just a topic for the participation trophy set. Invest the state's money wasted in bloated coaches salaries, professional grade facilities and kids who can't string together a sentence into cancer research, low cost medical treatments, and genetics and actually help save lives. Really, in the end, as much as I love sports...they all are just a game.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Student athletes should be just that...student athletes. Discussing fair compensation for a bunch of jocks who are supposedly going to school is stupid. Eliminate scholarships and the emphasis on each new 18 year star. Just a topic for the participation trophy set. Invest the state's money wasted in bloated coaches salaries, professional grade facilities and kids who can't string together a sentence into cancer research, low cost medical treatments, and genetics and actually help save lives. Really, in the end, as much as I love sports...they all are just a game.

I decide enough was enough when Jimbo Fisher got his A&M deal. That was criminal. I dont blame Fisher, but at some point the state needs to step in and say no. This is a public university, that kind of money should never be spent on a football coach.

$75 million fully gauranteed. He will probably walk out with nearly $100 million with everything else built in.

I'm sure someone will chime in and say it is privately raised, I do not care.
 

Black Elmo 2

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2004
53
42
0
Years ago the Pgh Pirates sued Dave Parker for breach of contract after his cocaine use came to light. The point being that players have a contractual obligation to their employer or, in this case, their school.
WVU could sue and would likely win the battle. However, they could lose the war because what recruit would want to play for a school that might sue them later on.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Years ago the Pgh Pirates sued Dave Parker for breach of contract after his cocaine use came to light. The point being that players have a contractual obligation to their employer or, in this case, their school.
WVU could sue and would likely win the battle. However, they could lose the war because what recruit would want to play for a school that might sue them later on.

What would you sue him for?

Kids are allowed to quit a team. They do all the time. Coaches dismiss kids all the time. We've never sued any of them before.

These are incomparable situations.
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
So if a player quits the team in the middle of the season, perhaps because his father died, or because he isnt playing, you think he owes the university a year of tuition money?

I assume you feel the way a student with an academic scholarship?

Lol you are nuts.


Obviously a death or life threatening illness to a first degree relative is different....and equally easy to put in that contract. Again welcome to adulthood. It’s called a LOA.

I don’t think a draft combine prep is an apples to apples comparison.
 
Last edited:

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
If you walk out of your job today, they stop paying you. They do not take your future income.

Besides, a years tution @ WVU is $25K, not likely to matter when you are looking at a 1st round salary.

Didnt Baker Mayfield get a $22 million sign on bonus?

This is incredibly stupid, and bitter - and jealous.


Try appropriate. Not all these guys are getting a 22mil bonus.

I get a sign on bonus. If I leave before my contract is up...I pay the prorated portion back. Is that easier to wrap your head around? You would be leaving a job before it’s completion where you were compensated based on completing that job (that scholarship doesn’t end in January....I guess it could, but that’s not the intent when that athlete signs.)

Bailing on your team before a CFP game would be screwing over your employer in a major way.

Again, don’t give a crap about lower tier bowls....however those big games could be million dollar deals for the school and its conference. I’m promoting paying the players for Christ’s sake!

There is something to be said for committing to something and completing that task. Coaches leave all the time, but the standard now is that they pay a buy out in order to leave...this is not different.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Try appropriate. Not all these guys are getting a 22mil bonus.

I get a sign on bonus. If I leave before my contract is up...I pay the prorated portion back. Is that easier to wrap your head around? You would be leaving a job before it’s completion where you were compensated based on completing that job (that scholarship doesn’t end in January....I guess it could, but that’s not the intent when that athlete signs.)

Bailing on your team before a CFP game would be screwing over your employer in a major way.

Again, don’t give a crap about lower tier bowls....however those big games could be million dollar deals for the school and its conference. I’m promoting paying the players for Christ’s sake!

There is something to be said for committing to something and completing that task. Coaches leave all the time, but the standard now is that they pay a buy out in order to leave...this is not different.

He is not an employee. He does not recieve a salary. He is not allowed to have any income tied to his standing as an athlete.

He is free to leave the team at any time, the penalty would be a loss of scholarship. This is very simple.

He has been awarded a grant in aid. Just like when an academic scholarship students drops out, we dont sue them for their previous semester of money. The student just is no longer eligible for the benefit.

Where do yoh guys get these ideas?
 

steeleer

Redshirt
Sep 19, 2005
3,160
44
0
He is not an employee. He does not recieve a salary. He is not allowed to have any income tied to his standing as an athlete.

He is free to leave the team at any time, the penalty would be a loss of scholarship. This is very simple.


Do you even read? The student will be paid. They would be under contract! Are you understanding the words I am saying???
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Do you even read? The student will be paid. They would be under contract! Are you understanding the words I am saying???

You're just making up hypotheticals for a totally meaningless situation.

Like Ive said, you cant sue, fine or garnish a players future earnings for skipping a bowl game.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
I absolutely think that if a player sat out a CFP game voluntarily they should be financially punished.

But punishing someone who doesn’t want to play in a crappy for **** 3rd tier bowl against an equally for **** 3rd tier opponent? GTFO

Let the underclassmen get some reps in a glorified exhibition game.

You're changing your position as you go.
 

DC_Mountaineer

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
42,278
1,787
0
Do you even read? The student will be paid. They would be under contract! Are you understanding the words I am saying???

But you are arguing for a punishment in a system that does not exist. You can make the argument that it should (and I would agree), but right now it doesn't. They can not be punished financially.
 

Darth_VadEER

All-Conference
Dec 14, 2010
23,025
3,212
0
Make them reimburse their last years scholarship money out of their NFL signing bonus. School would be dumb to not write that kind of stuff into their contract when they sign.

Garnish their future wages to payback scholarship money they were awarded as an amateur athlete? Cannot happen.