I don't care if you believe me or not, but I 100% believe the people who have said this. It has been said that he has called a lot of shots within the program. To be a type of "general manager"/player personnel role. He was hired by Eichorst and you are being short sighted if you think that Riley could have fired Devaney at any time. I don't think that Devaney being hired was a bad idea initially, but has turned out to be a bad thing in the long run.
In no way is Riley absolved of any responsibility of what has happened with this program and I have never said that. In fact, what has come out and has happened this year has made us realize even more of how much he shouldn't be running this program. I am just going with the bigger picture and point out that Riley is just a part of the problem here. Like I said the other day, outside of the fact that Riley isn't a very good coach, there are problems that run way higher within the athletic department that need to be fixed also. There is a whole dynamic that needs to be changed. We've screwed up a lot of hires since TO retired and Bill Byrne left. Hopefully the hiring of Moos is a start and that Moos can help correct what needs to be corrected.[/QUOTE]
Still no facts to back anything up. Just a "guy" you trust. Riley is the head coach and like all head coaches things start and end with him. He does not have to listen to anyone else in making his decisions on the field. He lives and dies with the decision he makes. Could he ask for input from others? Certainly, but it is just one part if the equation. Think about the implications of what you are suggesting: Moos, well Mike you know the team hasn't played real well. Mike, yes I know but it is all because I was told what to do, how to coach, who to play and recruit by someone else. Moos, oh so it really isn't your fault then Mike, you were just following the commands of someone lower on the food chain. So we just need to fire this guy and give you the right position of being the head coach. Yea right.