backs up Barr's summary as accurate?
Puts that talking point to bed. Graham should call him in ASAP.backs up Barr's summary as accurate?
This is why Mueller should testify
As witnessed by Mueller's letter about the Barr summary (of Mueller's report), that's not going to happen but thanks for starting a thread about that nonevent.backs up Barr's summary as accurate?
As witnessed by Mueller's letter about the Barr summary (of Mueller's report), that's not going to happen but thanks for starting a thread about that nonevent.
Huh? No Mueller said in the letter that Barr didn't accurately represent (in the Barr summary) what was in Mueller's report. In other words, what you are proposing in your thread topic would never be stated by Mueller since he already wrote a letter saying that he disagreed with Barr's take on the report.Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
Huh? No Mueller said in the letter that Barr didn't accurately represent (in the Barr summary) what was in Mueller's report.
Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
Lol, yeah that is what he said. I do believe he meant that Mueller's letter was all about not backing Barrs summary of his report, did ya just miss it or were you "shifting the narrative" of the thread?Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
Did you drink your lunch? or too much Faux News...He said no such thing.
They aren't in control of the Senate. Graham said there was no need to call Mueller.Barr told the Democrats to call him.
Huh? No Mueller said in the letter that Barr didn't accurately represent (in the Barr summary) what was in Mueller's report. In other words, what you are proposing in your thread topic would never be stated by Mueller since he already wrote a letter saying that he disagreed with Barr's take on the report.
Exactly.Wrong. Try again.
"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions. "
Did you drink your lunch? or too much Faux News...
“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”
didn't accurately represent
did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance
Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
Mueller's letter speaks for itself and the OP's trolling suggestion won't be happening. Mueller would never say that since he's already been critical of Barr's summary but you all can hope all you want.That does not call into question accuracy.
i think this administrator thing has gone to your head
LOL yes by all means, keep dreaming of what Mueller might say one day.does not equal
If you can't tell the difference, you need to go back to junior high.
It's pretty simple, Barr wrote a BS summary and Mueller called him out on it.That does not call into question accuracy.
It's pretty simple, Barr wrote a BS summary and Mueller called him out on it.
Did you drink your lunch? or too much Faux News...
“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”
400 pages. You want him to say what else?This is why Mueller should testify
The word "fully" appears to me to be in the same family as what the definition of IS is. It was a summary and does not portend to FULLY encapsulate 448 pages. Take that word out and the intent of the letter is dramatically altered.
400 pages. You want him to say what else?
The summaries Mueller told Barr to release would be a start.
Your mom has wings?
lol shewNo he didn't. Try reading gooder.
lol shew
“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”
Barr did not like Mueller's letter and was pissed because Mueller shoved it in his face. Rest assured that Mueller wrote that letter and I'm sure that Mueller would tell anyone as much.Actually, yes. Who would have thought we had to debate what the word "is" means. This is high stakes poker they are playing. Barr even mentioned that the letter had to be written by someone other than Muller...a political person maybe?