What happens when Mueller testifies and

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
backs up Barr's summary as accurate?
As witnessed by Mueller's letter about the Barr summary (of Mueller's report), that's not going to happen but thanks for starting a thread about that nonevent.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
As witnessed by Mueller's letter about the Barr summary (of Mueller's report), that's not going to happen but thanks for starting a thread about that nonevent.

Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
Huh? No Mueller said in the letter that Barr didn't accurately represent (in the Barr summary) what was in Mueller's report. In other words, what you are proposing in your thread topic would never be stated by Mueller since he already wrote a letter saying that he disagreed with Barr's take on the report.
 

Keyser76

Freshman
Apr 7, 2010
11,912
58
0
Mueller said in the letter that Barr wouldn't let him testify??! Wut kind of fresh hell is this?
Lol, yeah that is what he said. I do believe he meant that Mueller's letter was all about not backing Barrs summary of his report, did ya just miss it or were you "shifting the narrative" of the thread?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
He said no such thing.
Did you drink your lunch? or too much Faux News...

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Huh? No Mueller said in the letter that Barr didn't accurately represent (in the Barr summary) what was in Mueller's report. In other words, what you are proposing in your thread topic would never be stated by Mueller since he already wrote a letter saying that he disagreed with Barr's take on the report.

Wrong. Try again.

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions. "
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Wrong. Try again.

"The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions. "
Exactly.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
Did you drink your lunch? or too much Faux News...

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”

That does not call into question accuracy.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
That does not call into question accuracy.
Mueller's letter speaks for itself and the OP's trolling suggestion won't be happening. Mueller would never say that since he's already been critical of Barr's summary but you all can hope all you want.
 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113
Did you drink your lunch? or too much Faux News...

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”

The word "fully" appears to me to be in the same family as what the definition of IS is. It was a summary and does not portend to FULLY encapsulate 448 pages. Take that word out and the intent of the letter is dramatically altered.
 

tjebarr

Senior
Feb 3, 2007
25,122
917
0
The word "fully" appears to me to be in the same family as what the definition of IS is. It was a summary and does not portend to FULLY encapsulate 448 pages. Take that word out and the intent of the letter is dramatically altered.

 
Sep 6, 2013
27,594
120
0
That does not call into question accuracy.

LOL!

 

Pospecteer

All-Conference
Dec 8, 2006
36,502
3,161
113


Actually, yes. Who would have thought we had to debate what the word "is" means. This is high stakes poker they are playing. Barr even mentioned that the letter had to be written by someone other than Muller...a political person maybe?
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
No he didn't. Try reading gooder.
lol shew

“The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office’s work and conclusions,”
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,863
284
83
Actually, yes. Who would have thought we had to debate what the word "is" means. This is high stakes poker they are playing. Barr even mentioned that the letter had to be written by someone other than Muller...a political person maybe?
Barr did not like Mueller's letter and was pissed because Mueller shoved it in his face. Rest assured that Mueller wrote that letter and I'm sure that Mueller would tell anyone as much.