We need shooters

anon1763419335

All-American
Feb 10, 2006
23,231
5,077
113
As long as I have been reading this board, you are the most rude and arrogant poster here. It seems you are always a smartass. This is a message board, that people post thoughts and opinions on, to discuss. Your responses show just how insecure you are by putting people down to make yourself feel better. Then you have the nerve to tell them to "get a life". LOL What a loser.

yes i'm a loser. clearly i'm the problem. me and my arrogant ways. thats me. but its definitely not the folks who are already "critiquing" 18 and 19 years olds who havent even stepped a foot on campus yet. the 2016 season isnt even 4 days old yet and we have people "worried" about the season and just itching to blame cal for it. yup...i'm a loser and need to get a life.

somehow its not rude to bash an 18, 19, 20 year old...because its just an opinion. but as soon as an opinion is directed towards a fan....well who is the insecure one again?
 

CatDaddy4daWin

All-Conference
Dec 11, 2013
6,161
1,604
113
Really have no idea how well the freshmen will shoot until they get here. I know we'll have more threats down low so we won't need to take as many 3's and we'll have more open 3's because of the threat of our inside game. Something we did not have this year. That gantlet of shooters we had ended up losing in the round of 32. So just having shooters doesn't mean you're gonna be better.

I think Briscoe improves his accuracy quite a bit in the offseason. He was looking much, much better the last part of the year. If he can shoot even 30% from 3 that would be huge. I expect us to be decent - probably around 35% or so.
 

3rex

Senior
Nov 3, 2002
10,278
804
0
more or less time then you do "criticizing" cal?

much much much more...
Not just talking about me. That amounts to a small % of the bashing you do to every poster who dares make a post even remotely critical...or anything you don't like for that matter.
Hypocrite
 
Last edited:

brianpoe

Heisman
Mar 25, 2009
27,769
21,825
113
My hopes for Bolden are due primarily to my lack of faith of consistent outside shooting.

Without it we will need a 5 to free Bam up.

If the optimists are correct and we are more than decent from outside than the small lineup without a Bolden definitely works.

Predicting Bam's offense to Randle as the sole big is not fair, as Julius always had a 5 to play with.
 

anon1763419335

All-American
Feb 10, 2006
23,231
5,077
113
much much much more...
Not just talking about me. That amounts to a small % of the bashing you do to every poster who dares make a post even remotely critical...or anything you don't like for that matter.
Hypocrite

not bashing...criticizing. i get it now...we can bash, i mean criticize 18, 19, and 20 year old kids all the time....but posters are totally off limits.

hypocrite....right?
 

3rex

Senior
Nov 3, 2002
10,278
804
0
not bashing...criticizing. i get it now...we can bash, i mean criticize 18, 19, and 20 year old kids all the time....but posters are totally off limits.

hypocrite....right?

Uhhhh...you. bashed. Willis.

BostonCat said..."too bad willis sucks at defense and rebounding and all he wants to do is camp at the 3 point line. if he wasnt so inept at so many other areas of the game...he would play more."

You CONSTANTLY "criticize" others for the same thing...