Watching the Final Drive on BTN
1. Was watching some guys we wanted but did not get play some pretty good football, Westerkamp from Nebraska (think he would have helped the passing game, reminds me of Ebert) and Peppers from Michigan. He is a game changer on both sides of the ball. If he stays and plays all 4 years I think he will get a Heisman
2. As nice as it would have been to have those two guys watching the Michigan State and Ohio State highlights it seems to come down to the offensive and defensive lines. Last year we had a D-Line that was able to win their battles. This year does not appear that either line is winning battles consistently. We talk a lot about the wide receiver corp not being sufficient but why are we not producing winning o-lines?
3. Watching Denardo comment on OSU qb Barret, stating that the defense has to account for him on every play makes me think that you have to have a qb who can throw and is at least a threat to run. After last year I thought maybe Thorson was a true dual threat. He had some impressive touchdown runs. This year he does not look like a running threat and I doubt that defenses are spending any extra defensive players accounting for him.
4. In the Wisconsin game, down to Georgia St (Southern?) UW brought in a freshman qb who is a better running threat. He led them to the winning drive. Do not see anything wrong with giving ALviti some plays at qb if it would help open up more running lanes for JJ
1. Was watching some guys we wanted but did not get play some pretty good football, Westerkamp from Nebraska (think he would have helped the passing game, reminds me of Ebert) and Peppers from Michigan. He is a game changer on both sides of the ball. If he stays and plays all 4 years I think he will get a Heisman
2. As nice as it would have been to have those two guys watching the Michigan State and Ohio State highlights it seems to come down to the offensive and defensive lines. Last year we had a D-Line that was able to win their battles. This year does not appear that either line is winning battles consistently. We talk a lot about the wide receiver corp not being sufficient but why are we not producing winning o-lines?
3. Watching Denardo comment on OSU qb Barret, stating that the defense has to account for him on every play makes me think that you have to have a qb who can throw and is at least a threat to run. After last year I thought maybe Thorson was a true dual threat. He had some impressive touchdown runs. This year he does not look like a running threat and I doubt that defenses are spending any extra defensive players accounting for him.
4. In the Wisconsin game, down to Georgia St (Southern?) UW brought in a freshman qb who is a better running threat. He led them to the winning drive. Do not see anything wrong with giving ALviti some plays at qb if it would help open up more running lanes for JJ