USC RB Markese Stepp

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
Seriously? Ummm because they’re virtually never going to carry the ball...???

So walk-ons don’t really count as being on the team/roster?

if memory serves I believe there are frequent threads about walk on commits in fact below is a recent quote about a walk-on --

"____________ is a stud who could play for a lot of B1G teams."

if we really shouldn't count walkons I wish the university would post 2 different rosters - one with the players that count and the other with walkons
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
So walk-ons don’t really count as being on the team/roster?

if memory serves I believe there are frequent threads about walk on commits in fact below is a recent quote about a walk-on --

"____________ is a stud who could play for a lot of B1G teams."

if we really shouldn't count walkons I wish the university would post 2 different rosters - one with the players that count and the other with walkons
What a moron. Walk-ons don’t cost any scholarships. For you to troll by saying Nebraska has more RBs than anyone in the conference, you were obviously hoping no one checked and called you out, forcing you to include walk-ons...

I am gonna go out on a limb and say Nebraska also has more QBs, more WRs, more OLinemen, more Dlinemen, more linebackers, and more DBs than any other team in the conference. You know why? Walk-ons.

So no need for you to post here that we have more of any single position group anymore if you are going to include walk-ons.

2/10 for that troll attempt.
 

PCastro

Redshirt
Jul 20, 2019
1,299
1
0
of course you include walk ons - they are on the roster - Neb carries at least double the walkons of almost every power 5 program -why wouldn’t you include them?
But we still get 85 scholarships. If you assume we have more walksons logic would suggest we have more players at a given position than other teams if you include walkons.
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
What a moron. Walk-ons don’t cost any scholarships. For you to troll by saying Nebraska has more RBs than anyone in the conference, you were obviously hoping no one checked and called you out, forcing you to include walk-ons...

I am gonna go out on a limb and say Nebraska also has more QBs, more WRs, more OLinemen, more Dlinemen, more linebackers, and more DBs than any other team in the conference. You know why? Walk-ons.

So no need for you to post here that we have more of any single position group anymore if you are going to include walk-ons.

2/10 for that troll attempt.

got it-- walkons don't count -- will keep it mind going forward
if they aren't going to count as being on the roster - then they shouldn't be listed on the roster

I knew very well what I posted -- please point to which part of my original statement is false

Neb has far more RBs on their roster than any other divisional team
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
got it-- walkons don't count -- will keep it mind going forward
if they aren't going to count as being on the roster - then they shouldn't be listed on the roster

I knew very well what I posted -- please point to which part of my original statement is false
You know full well what you did. How does a larger number affect the scholarship distribution? How does having more walk ons on the team become a bad thing?

Your implication in posting what you posted was that it was a bad thing.

2/10 was because you weren’t wrong... but it was still a bad troll job.
 

egaRdeR

All-Conference
Oct 17, 2019
2,448
3,560
113
got it-- walkons don't count -- will keep it mind going forward
if they aren't going to count as being on the roster - then they shouldn't be listed on the roster

I knew very well what I posted -- please point to which part of my original statement is false
got it-- walkons don't count -- will keep it mind going forward
if they aren't going to count as being on the roster - then they shouldn't be listed on the roster

I knew very well what I posted -- please point to which part of my original statement is false
You sound a bit like Cliff.

Final Jeopardy! clue of "Archibald Leach, Bernard Schwartz and Lucille LeSueur" in the category of "Movies", Cliff responds incorrectly with "Who are 3 people who've never been in my kitchen? "

Well hold on there Alex, technically I am correct.
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
You know full week what you did. How does a larger number affect the scholarship distribution? How does having more walk ons on the team become a bad thing?

Your implication in posting what you posted was that it was a bad thing.

2/10 was because you weren’t wrong... but it was still a bad troll job.


i posted several times -- this staff can't handle a roster of 150+ players -- the average roster size is around 115-120
Nebraska has the worst on-filed coach to player ratio in power 5
very little time for individual instruction - scholarship players losing out on reps

and while it doesn't count for scholarship numbers it does count in participation numbers - those numbers have to be accounted for by either fewer men in other sports or more women in those sports (including extra scholarships in order to get to those number so they are title IX compliant)
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
i posted several times -- this staff can't handle a roster of 150+ players -- the average roster size is around 115-120
Nebraska has the worst on-filed coach to player ratio in power 5
very little time for individual instruction - scholarship players losing out on reps

and while it doesn't count for scholarship numbers it does count in participation numbers - those numbers have to be accounted for by either fewer men in other sports or more women in those sports (including extra scholarships in order to get to those number so they are title IX compliant)
I’ve heard you make that argument before many times. If that’s what you were getting at, why didn’t you say that from the start? Again, trolling, but a bad job.
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
How does having more walk ons on the team become a bad thing?

Your implication in posting what you posted was that it was a bad thing.


I’ve heard you make that argument before many times. If that’s what you were getting at, why didn’t you say that from the start? Again, trolling, but a bad job.


then why are you asking a specific question - and then bristling when I answer it
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
And like clockwork, he's hijacked yet another thread with his nonsense.
 

JabroniBlvd

Redshirt
Nov 5, 2005
1,390
4
0
i posted several times -- this staff can't handle a roster of 150+ players -- the average roster size is around 115-120
Nebraska has the worst on-filed coach to player ratio in power 5
very little time for individual instruction - scholarship players losing out on reps

and while it doesn't count for scholarship numbers it does count in participation numbers - those numbers have to be accounted for by either fewer men in other sports or more women in those sports (including extra scholarships in order to get to those number so they are title IX compliant)

I can see both sides with large roster size...Reimer will be one of our best defenders on the entire team soon and he's a walk-on. I think Gifford will end up being a good Safety for us in a few years - walk-on. There will be a few more names that come up who will contribute to our football team. Nouili and Miller will push to start on the OL - walk-ons. I think Martin will be a good WR for us - walk-on.
 

jlb321_rivals110621

All-American
Aug 8, 2014
7,956
5,492
0
I can see both sides with large roster size...Reimer will be one of our best defenders on the entire team soon and he's a walk-on. I think Gifford will end up being a good Safety for us in a few years - walk-on. There will be a few more names that come up who will contribute to our football team. Nouili and Miller will push to start on the OL - walk-ons. I think Martin will be a good WR for us - walk-on.

no one is saying get rid of walkons - cut the roster to 120 or so just like every other power 5 program in existence.

Neb carries an entire offense + defense + special teams unit more than other programs

no one needs to be 7 deep on offense and defense —- it severely hinders development
 
Last edited:

JabroniBlvd

Redshirt
Nov 5, 2005
1,390
4
0
no one is saying get rid of walkons - cut the roster to 120 or so just like every other power 5 program in existence.

Neb carries an entire offense + defense + special teams unit more than other programs

no one needs to be 7 deep on offense and defense —- it severely hinders development

But it can go hand in hand. Walk-ons is a numbers game, few will ever make a play to help us win a game. The more you have the more your % goes of of kids who can contribute. I do agree some with you though that it can take away from the starters during practice.
 

73 Red I

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2007
5,522
2,877
113
Were you not one of the people, that not too long ago were complaining saying we needed to grab more RBs because what we had wasn’t proven? I mean seriously starting to see the trend of nothing that HCSF does is good in your opinion....

I would personally venture to say that HCSF is trying to learn from prior mistakes, meaning he decided not to go after Burrow when all we had was Unproven QB talent, and look how that panned out, now we are looking at a similar situation but at RB with unproven RB depth. I do think it’s a little of an over correction as I do think we need to let your young guys have their chance to shine... I think we have some studs there, but they just need their time with the rock in their hands, so they can show what they can do.
I don't think we should diss on Frost for not going after Burrow. He had a true freshman that was coming off of a great year and looked to be the answer to Nebraska qb situation for at least a couple more years. AM2 didn't pan out. Burrow had a so so first year at LSU and then exploded when he got an NFL OC. He was surround by talented receivers, rb and ol. Joe would not have had that success at Nebraska as we are finding out about player development and recruiting at Nebraska is sub par.
 

timnsun

All-American
Jan 25, 2008
13,815
7,519
3
Neb has far more RBs on their roster than any other divisional team

seems like quite an indictment on recruiting when they are after USCs third string RB
How many scholarship recruits by comparison to other divisional teams? If he would come to Nebraska on scholarship, I think it’s important to compare apples to apples.
 

Land Shark7

Freshman
Apr 27, 2004
216
51
28
So walk-ons don’t really count as being on the team/roster?

if memory serves I believe there are frequent threads about walk on commits in fact below is a recent quote about a walk-on --

"____________ is a stud who could play for a lot of B1G teams."

if we really shouldn't count walkons I wish the university would post 2 different rosters - one with the players that count and the other with walkons
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
 

Suhrreal

All-Conference
Jun 1, 2009
7,380
1,049
0
Marvin Scott III is not a big back.

I don't know who started this but it keeps being said. Marvin Scott is 5'9" (allegedly) and 195 pounds. That is not a big back. Tune in tonight to see what 2 big backs look like.
 

JabroniBlvd

Redshirt
Nov 5, 2005
1,390
4
0
I don't know who started this but it keeps being said. Marvin Scott is 5'9" (allegedly) and 195 pounds. That is not a big back. Tune in tonight to see what 2 big backs look like.

He's 5'9 220 lbs....so he's shorter than Mills and weighs the same as a true freshman. I get he isn't Najee Harris, no one said he was.
 

BuckysBoys1

Redshirt
Mar 28, 2019
2,090
30
0
I don't know who started this but it keeps being said. Marvin Scott is 5'9" (allegedly) and 195 pounds. That is not a big back. Tune in tonight to see what 2 big backs look like.
He is 5’9 210 lbs. Not 195 like you keep trying to hope for. 210 is not 195.
 

Headcard

Heisman
Feb 2, 2005
192,508
20,877
113
I hope we get him and we keep Mills. Mills can play FB, when they are on the field together. He is a good and willing blocker, I know wishful thinking.
 
Last edited:

73 Red I

All-Conference
Nov 25, 2007
5,522
2,877
113
I can see both sides with large roster size...Reimer will be one of our best defenders on the entire team soon and he's a walk-on. I think Gifford will end up being a good Safety for us in a few years - walk-on. There will be a few more names that come up who will contribute to our football team. Nouili and Miller will push to start on the OL - walk-ons. I think Martin will be a good WR for us - walk-on.
You've come up with the names of five walk-ons out of seventy on the roster. I'll bet those five would have been given walk on opportunities if there were only fifty walk-ons. What's happening with the other twenty other than requiring more locker space?