That was my thoughtSo can we just bump old threads right now and keep responding to it to keep it alive ??? Asking for a friend
Maybe bump a bunch of old classic threads the day before this starts
That was my thoughtSo can we just bump old threads right now and keep responding to it to keep it alive ??? Asking for a friend
It will be a good jumping off point.
Free board is going nowhere.Will not be surprised if the free board "features" and access will be extremely limited.
I hope you didn't actually try Coors Light any one of those times.
Great me posting Coors Light as beer i tried 20x on the beer thread all for naught
Bu-bye.um its happening to this board too...alot of good references to music, weather, health, food, history, past seasons all gone
you are right, i will be starting fresh...elsewhere
My guess is that it's a lot of data and will require time and effort to bring it over and they don't want to pay for it now.The replies to Shannon Terry's posting criticize his decision. He responds that this is the "very best we can do for now. We have the data and can revisit when we get critical measures completed." have asked -- and I'd be surprised if I get an answer -- if the reason is only technical, or if there are legal or policy rationales.
So can we just bump old threads right now and keep responding to it to keep it alive ??? Asking for a friend
Will not be surprised if the free board "features" and access will be extremely limited.
My guess is that it's a lot of data and will require time and effort to bring it over and they don't want to pay for it now.
Exactly. Typical lip service from a corporate blowhard. The guy founded both major sites, this one and the one that runs on 1980s message board technology, and now On3.If that happens, which would be foolish, the board will wither.
It's not all that much effort to do it, in fact now is the time to do it as part of the conversion. My experience has been if it isn't done now, it more than likely never gets done.
Wait it’s not rivals decision? Isn’t Rivals being acquired by the guy that created rivals? So it is his decision, which would make it rivals decision. This is nexus of the universe type shite.Unfortunately this is not my decision, nor is it Rivals decision, as of July 1st we will owned by On3. Nothing changes from a content standpoint and we will continue to post the very latest Rutgers scoop.
As we continue to learn more about the merger, we will continue to update you guys.
It's more effort than just getting the sites merged and we all know how cheap Project Managers can be.If that happens, which would be foolish, the board will wither.
It's not all that much effort to do it, in fact now is the time to do it as part of the conversion. My experience has been if it isn't done now, it more than likely never gets done.
He's Chris Ashthis is total ********...it wipes out 20 years plus of peoples posting history..yes i realize only searchable for about 9 years but still
the community will be gone...its akin to the horrible John O move to TOS. It appears Mr Shannon is out of touch with the lifeblood which is the message board.
a board starting from scratch with a new format means its totally new..what is the incentive to stay here
would seem lip service to say oh it will come back some day...hahahaha
See this more and more with corporations. Penny pinching, cost cutting so that top dogs get richer while those on the lower rungs and the customers/clients get smaller crumbs.It costs money to migrate data. It’s pretty oblivious that’s the reason. Anything to save a buck.
Nothing is changing in regards to how the site is operated, there will be some cosmetic changes and an upgrade of the boards, but everything else will all remain the same.What about premium?
Ohhh... time = money... did not consider MOVING the data in a previous comment on this, only storage costs. But still.. they do not store images, only text and links. Bandwidth costs? Still think it is short-sighted and only goes to show what they really think of the content created by their customers.It costs money to migrate data. It’s pretty oblivious that’s the reason. Anything to save a buck.
Was this board better under ash and flood ?The truth is Greg Schiano killed this board by not allowing anything whatsoever that happens at practice to be reported. In GS part 1, there was robust discussion of players, practice, opponents. Now there's very little of that during the season except maybe on game days and the day after and next to none in the off-season. Twitter (X) has a lot to do with it too.
Yes, you need to do that for all the diehard NBA fans we have here, especially @Greene Rice FIG.I need to bump my “Zion will be a bust” and “Jordan Dingle won’t be a NBA player” posts now!
We have tons of insider content on recruiting, injuries, etc every week throughout the season. Highly recommend giving us another try, you won't regret it.The truth is Greg Schiano killed this board by not allowing anything whatsoever that happens at practice to be reported. In GS part 1, there was robust discussion of players, practice, opponents. Now there's very little of that during the season except maybe on game days and the day after and next to none in the off-season. Twitter (X) has a lot to do with it too.
"The user clout / reputations / status will be imported. i made the decision to not import historical board posts."Look at the bright side, bac. It''ll take at least ...what, two or three months before we can make fun of your ridiculous post total again?
That's what you call a windfall. Breathe the fresh, clean air of freedom from the shackles of your past.
Everyone who got their takes ruined on the CE board always cries about it.Boo hoo why does the CE belong in the sewer? Guess you got tired of being taken to the woodshed, kinda like when you had a hissy fit over the LA Fire Chief that did get dumped as I predicted.
It’s definitely not a tech issue. Would be very easy to do. They just don’t want to pay for it.The replies to Shannon Terry's posting criticize his decision. He responds that this is the "very best we can do for now. We have the data and can revisit when we get critical measures completed." have asked -- and I'd be surprised if I get an answer -- if the reason is only technical, or if there are legal or policy rationales.
Tepid Take: maintaining post counts/clout, etc. helps weed out trolls and those just wanting to stir up sh$t.Hot take: Removing post counts and clout should be done as well.
Is it some point of pride to be a "legend" or "hall of famer"?
Do people actually look at that stuff?
I couldn't even guess at my post count or status without checking.
A full reset literally has zero effect on posting on the board.
Putting you on record RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!I need to bump my “Zion will be a bust” and “Jordan Dingle won’t be a NBA player” posts now!
Agreed. And I'm not even premium.We have tons of insider content on recruiting, injuries, etc every week throughout the season. Highly recommend giving us another try, you won't regret it.
Hmmmmm......you will either leave here for good or we all get to refer to you as BACO (Bac Always Chickens Out). Win....Win situation for the rest of us.
The Knight Report
His D-Line Led the Big Ten in Sacks, Minnesota Fumbled Him. Rutgers Is Hoping to Scoop and Score
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Fall Camp is Rolling: Get 75% off The Knight Report now - JUST 2 Days Left
The Knight Report
Rutgers' new defensive end took lessons from the Super Bowl champs - and his favorite team
The Knight Report
Four Rutgers Football commit candidates in the 2028 class
The Knight Report
Projecting the 2026 paths for all 25 Rutgers freshmen and how the new 5-for-5 rule factors in