UPDATE - On3 will be bringing over all historical posts!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Richie O

Hall of Famer
Staff member
Mar 21, 2016
70,729
238,772
113
Unfortunately this is not my decision, nor is it Rivals decision, as of July 1st we will owned by On3. Nothing changes from a content standpoint and we will continue to post the very latest Rutgers scoop.

As we continue to learn more about the merger, we will continue to update you guys.
 

RobertG

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
13,432
12,781
113
All of my wisdom gone. I weep not for myself but for future generations who will not have access to the knowledge, wisdom, insight and love I've imparted on to these pages. With this decision a light of hope will be extinguished and humanity will suffer.
 

Retired711

Heisman
Nov 20, 2001
19,971
10,152
58
The replies to Shannon Terry's posting criticize his decision. He responds that this is the "very best we can do for now. We have the data and can revisit when we get critical measures completed." have asked -- and I'd be surprised if I get an answer -- if the reason is only technical, or if there are legal or policy rationales.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bac2therac

RobertG

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
13,432
12,781
113
The replies to Shannon Terry's posting criticize his decision. He responds that this is the "very best we can do for now. We have the data and can revisit when we get critical measures completed." have asked -- and I'd be surprised if I get an answer -- if the reason is only technical, or if there are legal or policy rationales.
My guess is that it's a lot of data and will require time and effort to bring it over and they don't want to pay for it now.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,003
61,524
113
Will not be surprised if the free board "features" and access will be extremely limited.

If that happens, which would be foolish, the board will wither.

My guess is that it's a lot of data and will require time and effort to bring it over and they don't want to pay for it now.

It's not all that much effort to do it, in fact now is the time to do it as part of the conversion. My experience has been if it isn't done now, it more than likely never gets done.
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,917
87,829
113
If that happens, which would be foolish, the board will wither.



It's not all that much effort to do it, in fact now is the time to do it as part of the conversion. My experience has been if it isn't done now, it more than likely never gets done.
Exactly. Typical lip service from a corporate blowhard. The guy founded both major sites, this one and the one that runs on 1980s message board technology, and now On3.

Quick sampling of On3 message boards, none seem to be free:

 
  • Sad
Reactions: bac2therac

kupuna133

All-American
Jul 13, 2015
7,052
7,844
113
Unfortunately this is not my decision, nor is it Rivals decision, as of July 1st we will owned by On3. Nothing changes from a content standpoint and we will continue to post the very latest Rutgers scoop.

As we continue to learn more about the merger, we will continue to update you guys.
Wait it’s not rivals decision? Isn’t Rivals being acquired by the guy that created rivals? So it is his decision, which would make it rivals decision. This is nexus of the universe type shite.
 

RobertG

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
13,432
12,781
113
If that happens, which would be foolish, the board will wither.



It's not all that much effort to do it, in fact now is the time to do it as part of the conversion. My experience has been if it isn't done now, it more than likely never gets done.
It's more effort than just getting the sites merged and we all know how cheap Project Managers can be.
 

HeywoodGiant

All-Conference
May 5, 2019
2,582
2,434
77
this is total ********...it wipes out 20 years plus of peoples posting history..yes i realize only searchable for about 9 years but still

the community will be gone...its akin to the horrible John O move to TOS. It appears Mr Shannon is out of touch with the lifeblood which is the message board.

a board starting from scratch with a new format means its totally new..what is the incentive to stay here

would seem lip service to say oh it will come back some day...hahahaha
He's Chris Ash
 

Knight Shift

Heisman
May 19, 2011
89,917
87,829
113
It costs money to migrate data. It’s pretty oblivious that’s the reason. Anything to save a buck.
See this more and more with corporations. Penny pinching, cost cutting so that top dogs get richer while those on the lower rungs and the customers/clients get smaller crumbs.
 

Local Shill

All-American
Aug 30, 2001
21,525
7,330
113
The truth is Greg Schiano killed this board by not allowing anything whatsoever that happens at practice to be reported. In GS part 1, there was robust discussion of players, practice, opponents. Now there's very little of that during the season except maybe on game days and the day after and next to none in the off-season. Twitter (X) has a lot to do with it too.
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
It costs money to migrate data. It’s pretty oblivious that’s the reason. Anything to save a buck.
Ohhh... time = money... did not consider MOVING the data in a previous comment on this, only storage costs. But still.. they do not store images, only text and links. Bandwidth costs? Still think it is short-sighted and only goes to show what they really think of the content created by their customers.
 

Plum Street

Heisman
Jun 21, 2009
27,306
23,010
0
The truth is Greg Schiano killed this board by not allowing anything whatsoever that happens at practice to be reported. In GS part 1, there was robust discussion of players, practice, opponents. Now there's very little of that during the season except maybe on game days and the day after and next to none in the off-season. Twitter (X) has a lot to do with it too.
Was this board better under ash and flood ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: newell138

Richie O

Hall of Famer
Staff member
Mar 21, 2016
70,729
238,772
113
The truth is Greg Schiano killed this board by not allowing anything whatsoever that happens at practice to be reported. In GS part 1, there was robust discussion of players, practice, opponents. Now there's very little of that during the season except maybe on game days and the day after and next to none in the off-season. Twitter (X) has a lot to do with it too.
We have tons of insider content on recruiting, injuries, etc every week throughout the season. Highly recommend giving us another try, you won't regret it.
 

DHajekRC84

Heisman
Aug 9, 2001
30,708
19,816
0
Look at the bright side, bac. It''ll take at least ...what, two or three months before we can make fun of your ridiculous post total again?

That's what you call a windfall. Breathe the fresh, clean air of freedom from the shackles of your past.
"The user clout / reputations / status will be imported. i made the decision to not import historical board posts."
6:38 PM · May 27, 2025

I assume that means post totals remain. Just the posts themselves go away.

https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?re...^s1_&ref_url=&in_reply_to=1927494647653294191
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
197,237
149,287
113
Boo hoo why does the CE belong in the sewer? Guess you got tired of being taken to the woodshed, kinda like when you had a hissy fit over the LA Fire Chief that did get dumped as I predicted.
Everyone who got their takes ruined on the CE board always cries about it.

My posting history is impeccable. Ability to access or not is t changing that. Any future posts I make will be as impeccable.
 

Caliknight

Hall of Famer
Sep 21, 2001
197,237
149,287
113
The replies to Shannon Terry's posting criticize his decision. He responds that this is the "very best we can do for now. We have the data and can revisit when we get critical measures completed." have asked -- and I'd be surprised if I get an answer -- if the reason is only technical, or if there are legal or policy rationales.
It’s definitely not a tech issue. Would be very easy to do. They just don’t want to pay for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: runrutgersrun

NickRU714

Heisman
Aug 18, 2009
14,251
13,051
113
Hot take: Removing post counts and clout should be done as well.

Is it some point of pride to be a "legend" or "hall of famer"?
Do people actually look at that stuff?

I couldn't even guess at my post count or status without checking.

A full reset literally has zero effect on posting on the board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

RUPete

Heisman
Feb 5, 2003
26,841
16,113
0
Hot take: Removing post counts and clout should be done as well.

Is it some point of pride to be a "legend" or "hall of famer"?
Do people actually look at that stuff?

I couldn't even guess at my post count or status without checking.

A full reset literally has zero effect on posting on the board.
Tepid Take: maintaining post counts/clout, etc. helps weed out trolls and those just wanting to stir up sh$t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Three Rutgers wrestlers ink NIL deal with Miller's Rentals
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Fall Camp is Rolling: Get 75% off The Knight Report now - JUST 2 Days Left
  3. 03 The Knight Report Michael O'Connor named to the Allstate Wuerffel Trophy Watchlist
  4. 04 The Knight Report Four Rutgers Football commit candidates in the 2028 class
  5. 05 The Knight Report Projecting the 2026 paths for all 25 Rutgers freshmen and how the new 5-for-5 rule factors in