Several from the squad are speaking out against the decision.
Thanks. Got anymore where that one come from?
Several from the squad are speaking out against the decision.
I’ll see after work. If you go to that Instagram page maybe her cheer friends did as well. But what I saw was basically same one being posted on multiple accountsThanks. Got anymore where that one come from?
UK cheerleaders respond -
https://kentuckysportsradio.com/mai...Pnsw4S-B2PalQnJ5Vp1Wq35fXbHvCng2AaMC-nBK3nhkg
Well actually they do but thats not the gem. To the person they seem to suggest that Barney is making a power grab as the squad was pretty independent. Mitchy wanted control and this was how to do it.Well, I must say, that's a pretty meaningless response. Three of the people quoted were former cheerleaders who've been out of the program for years, did not attend the events in question, and thus have no way of knowing what actually happened. And the fourth guy wouldn't give his name and admitted he was drinking at the retreat.
It's clear they're very unhappy about the decision, but none of them actually deny the allegations.
UNC was infinitely far more egregious and damaging, orchestrated by Tar Heel administration and nothing at all happened to them, their school or the athletes. They all denied knowing anything for decades, as if there was no data to discover a problem.Let's just hope this is all there is to the story.
I think most understand the "college kids will be college kids" angle. But the Advisor and Coaches weren't kids. They knew better.
And in today's climate you can't pretend the rules aren't different from days gone by (and rightly so) regarding any form of hazing, underage drinking, or behavior that puts the program at risk. They were there to protect both the students and the schools best interests. They failed in that charge. Period.
I just dont want UK dirty laundry aired in public.
I read that the Oldham girl was going to return to UK next year. I would think that would cause problems, She might not be treated very well.
Great post. Yeah, I mean being a coach and having Sandy Bell nitpicking the **** out of everything you do? Hell no.When I watched the press conference, I thought their presentation was strange. Appeared they were all acting tough. If you did not know the story, you would have thought someone had committed murder. "This is a new day in KY cheerleading and we will get the best coaches" or some such nonsense. What does Sandy Bell know about cheerleading and coaching cheerleading?
First of all, the best coaches in cheerleading, you just fired. Second of all, what person would want to coach at UK now? UK just indicated all you have to do is threaten a lawsuit and you will lose you job. Third, what person/coach wants to coach or make a decision with Sandy Bell hovering over you head.
In Mrs. Tyler Thompson's article on KSR, T J Smith made a really good point about the cheerleaders having a "self sustaining program".
The punishment does not fit the crime. UK will have a hard time finding quality coaches.
What hazing? Nobody was forced to do anything, it was college kids doing stupid stuff. The players didn’t decide who got to be on the blue squad based on participation in basket tosses or performing a lewd cheer. The coaches didn’t require participation in these activities, much less to guarantee a spot on the team.Exception, I agree with most of what you said. A couple of points:
1. UNC should have been punished, should have disciplined those involved without even the NCAA mandating it. Same with Louisville. Since this is Cheerleading, there is no NCAA to step in and enforce anything.
2. Buried in this story of drinking and bad behavior, which is pretty much part of college life, is the "employment of cheerleaders" off-site by the advisor. That alone doesnt break any laws or rules whatsoever, yet was mentioned in the press release. Why? This little gem is actually a bigger, uglier story that UK would like to end right there.
3. Hazing is being forced to do something you would prefer not to do in order to remain part of something you desperately want to be part of.
And of course, other bad behavior never justifies new bad behavior. Had these cheerleaders done this on their own. A few slaps on the wrist and we move on. But to do this in the company of UK advisor and coaches, and none of them stepped in to stop it ..... that's where you have to draw the line and say "as a school we dont approve". The following nvestigation then found A LOT of things they don't approve of. So we found some moral fortitude and did the right thing.
UK did the right thing here. I hope we don't want or need to air the rest of the story in the light of day. It's not a good look. And the cheerleaders coming out to protect the program is "the family circling the wagons". I get it, I support you guys, but the process to fix this is needed.
Exactly.UNC was infinitely far more egregious and damaging, orchestrated by Tar Heel administration and nothing at all happened to them, their school or the athletes. They all denied knowing anything for decades, as if there was no data to discover a problem.
UK on the other hand went too overboard, give them credit for taking responsibility but the penalty was ridiculous for the infraction. Athletes actually tried to hide something that wasn’t mandatory for anyone to do. They should have punished the kids if anything.
No way UK football and basketball players aren’t and haven’t been smoking weed and drinking for decades. Are we firing Cal or Stoops if it’s found out? Nope, we will suspend the athlete and that’s it. The double standards are obvious, I just don’t see this as egregious. The cheerleaders weren’t drinking and driving, forcing anybody to do anything.
Totally agree, although I think nudity being involved and Mitch's religious beliefs played a big role.Exactly.
Football, basketball, and baseball players drink etc on trips as well. Seems Jomo was very proactive in trying to enforce a no alcohol/professionalism environment.
The fact any other major sport staff wouldn’t have been wiped out over Darnell Dodson failing a drug test for example, gives some credibility that this was the Athletic Dept grabbing power.
Not to mention they found that other accusations were false which should also show that the accusers were embellishing...should make you ask the question of motive then.
Fair. He has his convictions and I'm a Christian as well. However, it seems that the only people who participated in nude stunts were consenting adults deciding to do it on their own becuase they thought it was funny or risky/exciting...much like when young kids/adults skinny dip or run a naked lap around the house. Young people do dumb things when in large groups or excess free time.Totally agree, although I think nudity being involved and Mitch's religious beliefs played a big role.
From Grant v Oldham fight. This is funny, I don’t care where you’re from:The 28 million hasn't been publicly reported because as of now, there is no case, but that was the threat made by Karen and her attorney to UK if actions were not taken.
As far as the lawsuits, the information I have is in PDF, so I can't post it, but you can google Karen Oldham vs Cabell Co. Board of education, and then look up Theresa Grant vs Cabell co. BOE. In the first one she sued a school board for not giving her a position she felt she was most qualified for. In the 2nd, she was accused of using her position to seek revenge on a teacher whom she wasn't freinds with and that didn't vote for her for a position she was seeking.
There is also some interesting information about it all circulating on social media, but obviously I can't verify the accuracy of some of that.
Bitches be mean!From Grant v Oldham fight. This is funny, I don’t care where you’re from:
“During the 2002 - 2003 school year, Cabell Midland High School had a dress- up day year, and Grievant told Oldham she might dress like her. The next day, when then- Principal John Flowers saw Grievant dressed as Oldham, he called Oldham down to see Grievant's attire. At the time of this occurrence, everyone who saw Grievant and Oldham believed the matter was in good fun and reported Oldham did not appear upset. When Oldham saw Grievant she indicated that if she wanted to look like her she should decrease the size of her hips, and Grievant responded she would also need to lose some weight in the chest area. Contrary to Oldham's assertions in the following school years, Oldham was not upset about this event at the time it happened.”
Are you freakin serious? What a joke. Whoever made this decision should be ashamed and is a pos. If I were on the cheer team I’d have absolutely zero to do with the girl that caused all this. Her and her crazy mom can jump off a cliff for all I care.Lol, she (Karen Oldham) was allegedly suing UK for 28 million for emotional distress for her daughter (Tylee Oldham) who was set to transfer to Clemson after she didn't make the Blue squad. Which is evidently the highest level. Now that the coaches are fired and new tryouts are taking place, Tylee has decided not to transfer. Evidently this was the universities way of settling with Karen to avoid the lawsuit.
Ohh, I would want to be the person tossing her into the air during the next televised event they air with cheerleaders present. I would give her little *** the hardest and highest toss I could and fall backwards out of way like I tripped or was hurt. Then I'd watch as she bounced off the turf or hardwood. Hopefully her mom can be front row to see as well.Are you freakin serious? What a joke. Whoever made this decision should be ashamed and is a pos. If I were on the cheer team I’d have absolutely zero to do with the girl that caused all this. Her and her crazy mom can jump off a cliff for all I care.
Whoa!Ohh, I would want to be the person tossing her into the air during the next televised event they air with cheerleaders present. I would give her little *** the hardest and highest toss I could must and fall backwards out of way like I tripped or was hurt. Then I'd watch as she bounced off the turf or hardwood. Hopefully her mom can be front row to see as well.
I’d definitely watch that routine lol.Ohh, I would want to be the person tossing her into the air during the next televised event they air with cheerleaders present. I would give her little *** the hardest and highest toss I could must and fall backwards out of way like I tripped or was hurt. Then I'd watch as she bounced off the turf or hardwood. Hopefully her mom can be front row to see as well.
You're sure assuming a lot in your eagerness to blame the "little princess" and her mother for exposing things that they found unacceptable. It sounds to me like this sort of stuff had gone on for a long time while the "coaching legends" looked the other way. If true, they ruined their own careers. They did seem get a bit of negative "help" from alumini cheerleaders and hangers-on who had no business being involved. No one should be tarred and feathered for telling the truth, and if the truth hurts, so be it. If the cheerleader and her mother were not telling the truth then the investigators should be blamed for not doing their jobs. If the reported acts don't merit the punishment, in your considered opinion, take it up with the President and AD of UK. In your case you're blaming the messengers for exposing behavior that in your opinion should be acceptable. Obviously the leadership at UK does not share your opinion. .I’d definitely watch that routine lol.
One girl and her mother single handedly ruined careers of coaching legends and probably ended the greatest dynasty the sport has ever seen. Probably all because mommies little princess wasn’t in the spot they thought she should be in. Makes me sick.
Sweet Lord, please educate yourself before talking out of your ***. She lied about most of the stuff she said and much if it was admittedly heresay. No one else has corroborated it, current and former cheerleaders have publicly stated they were never even interviewed. The cheerleaders admitted they snuck in the alcohol and knew is wasn't permitted on the events. They admitted they took steps to conceal it from the coaches by mixing it in Gatorade and water bottles. The people who sere skinning dipping and going topless said they did so completely voluntarily and not as part of anything hazing related. Karen Oldham even admitted her daughter didn't take part in this. The trauma allegedly came from her daughter reciting a cheer from the 1970's that was "vulger."You're sure assuming a lot in your eagerness to blame the "little princess" and her mother for exposing things that they found unacceptable. It sounds to me like this sort of stuff had gone on for a long time while the "coaching legends" looked the other way. If true, they ruined their own careers. They did seem get a bit of negative "help" from alumini cheerleaders and hangers-on who had no business being involved. No one should be tarred and feathered for telling the truth, and if the truth hurts, so be it. If the cheerleader and her mother were not telling the truth then the investigators should be blamed for not doing their jobs. If the reported acts don't merit the punishment, in your considered opinion, take it up with the President and AD of UK. In your case you're blaming the messengers for exposing behavior that in your opinion should be acceptable. Obviously the leadership at UK does not share your opinion. .
Totally agree, although I think nudity being involved and Mitch's religious beliefs played a big role.
I don't want anyone to do anything overt but I hope the student body makes her so unwelcome she runs home crying to mommy. I'm not very happy with Pope Mitch over this. It is a gross overreaction and has done terrible damage to the program. It would serve UK right if the entire cheer squad transferred.I was thinking this too, it's gonna be very awkward for her on campus with everyone knowing she and her mom were the snitches here.
I'd imagine other cheerleaders are mighty pissed at her, which could be extra uncomfortable in an endeavor where you have to trust them to catch you when falling.
It apparently did happen but its exaggerated and UK had a terrible overreaction. College kids acting like college kids...what a shocker and they tried their best to do it behind their coaches backs. The firing is unwarranted.You're sure assuming a lot in your eagerness to blame the "little princess" and her mother for exposing things that they found unacceptable. It sounds to me like this sort of stuff had gone on for a long time while the "coaching legends" looked the other way. If true, they ruined their own careers. They did seem get a bit of negative "help" from alumini cheerleaders and hangers-on who had no business being involved. No one should be tarred and feathered for telling the truth, and if the truth hurts, so be it. If the cheerleader and her mother were not telling the truth then the investigators should be blamed for not doing their jobs. If the reported acts don't merit the punishment, in your considered opinion, take it up with the President and AD of UK. In your case you're blaming the messengers for exposing behavior that in your opinion should be acceptable. Obviously the leadership at UK does not share your opinion. .
I have no clue what happened. But, the reaction on here is truly astounding. The mother and daughter reported something that nobody involved has denied. The school took action after an investigation was completed. Slandering the whistle blower is a useless exercise unless accompanied by facts that disprove UK's conclusions. So far, no new facts have appeared. Raising hell about whistle blowers and complaining about punishment imposed used to bring hoots of derision on this board. Of course those complaints involved a different school.
Bull. There’s been past cheerleaders deny this crap. Princess and mommy are the ONLY ones to have said a negative thing about the coaches. All past cheerleaders have come out strong to support the coaches. Now it’s reported that princess and mommy did the same crap in high school. I’m glad the LHL made the woman’s name public. Hope she’s prepared for what’s coming.I have no clue what happened. But, the reaction on here is truly astounding. The mother and daughter reported something that nobody involved has denied. The school took action after an investigation was completed. Slandering the whistle blower is a useless exercise unless accompanied by facts that disprove UK's conclusions. So far, no new facts have appeared. Raising hell about whistle blowers and complaining about punishment imposed used to bring hoots of derision on this board. Of course those complaints involved a different school.
UK fired the coaches based on the results of its investigation. If the "princess and mommy" were lying, then UK did a p-poor job of investigation. I know nothing about any previous complaints made by the mother and doubt that you know much either. If you have info germane to this case then your duty is to provide it to UK since they either don't have the info or have looked at it and discounted it. Whining on a message board is unlikely to shed any light on the case.Bull. There’s been past cheerleaders deny this crap. Princess and mommy are the ONLY ones to have said a negative thing about the coaches. All past cheerleaders have come out strong to support the coaches. Now it’s reported that princess and mommy did the same crap in high school. I’m glad the LHL made the woman’s name public. Hope she’s prepared for what’s coming.
Except most all of what was stated by mom and player has been denied by everyone invovled and proven out right false in many cases. The mom and student claimed coaches provided alcohol. That was false. The mom and student said they were forced to go topless or nude. This was false. The mom and student said students were being forced to perform the basket toss activities. This was false. The mom and student said students were forced into hazing activities. This was false.I have no clue what happened. But, the reaction on here is truly astounding. The mother and daughter reported something that nobody involved has denied. The school took action after an investigation was completed. Slandering the whistle blower is a useless exercise unless accompanied by facts that disprove UK's conclusions. So far, no new facts have appeared. Raising hell about whistle blowers and complaining about punishment imposed used to bring hoots of derision on this board. Of course those complaints involved a different school.
I have no idea what the mother claimed happened. She posted on Facebook that she is not the original reporter to UK and that she and her daughter have only responded truthfully to questions from UK investigators. I read on Kentucky.com that two previously unmentioned cheerleaders have verified the allegations made and have filed suit against UK. I don't know the facts of the case but it appears that UK is trying to get in front of things by taking drastic action against those employees involved. I'd bet the farm that things are a lot more serious than they're described on this message board.Except most all of what was stated by mom and player has been denied by everyone invovled and proven out right false in many cases. The mom and student claimed coaches provided alcohol. That was false. The mom and student said they were forced to go topless or nude. This was false. The mom and student said students were being forced to perform the basket toss activities. This was false. The mom and student said students were forced into hazing activities. This was false.
If you don't know, why comment and then criticize others for commenting without knowing?I have no idea what the mother claimed happened. She posted on Facebook that she is not the original reporter to UK and that she and her daughter have only responded truthfully to questions from UK investigators. I read on Kentucky.com that two previously unmentioned cheerleaders have verified the allegations made and have filed suit against UK. I don't know the facts of the case but it appears that UK is trying to get in front of things by taking drastic action against those employees involved. I'd bet the farm that things are a lot more serious than they're described on this message board.
I say I don't know because all I have to go on is what other people write. I criticized a couple of posters for making statements of fact that they had no way of knowing. BTW, do you know that the coaches were fired to avoid a lawsuit, or are you speculating? Who made this decision for UK? Looks to me like firing the coaches is a public admission that some serious misconduct took place.If you don't know, why comment and then criticize others for commenting without knowing?
Karen Oldham and her daughter were the initial whistleblowers that launched the investigation. 2 other cheerleaders gave statements to the university via the same attorney during the investigation. They confirmed some of things like there being alcohol snuck in and that people were topless or nude. They did not confirm that anyone was forced to do anything, that alcohol was provided by coaches or that they were hazed.
If they already lied to UK, it's not really hard to imagine they would lie to the general public. Particularly now that she is getting backlash and alleged threats.
There really is nothing else. It's all been pretty public. UK just wanted to avoid the costs of a potential lawsuit because that is what the Oldham's threatened.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.courier-journal.com/amp/5229721002
KSR Football
Will Stein will not let Kentucky forget embarrassing loss to Vanderbilt
KSR Football
Will Stein Let His Pal Ben Arbuckle Know That He Was Ready for a Trick Play
KSR Football
Jordan Castell Loads Up on National Awards
KSR Football
UK Fans of the Day want more College Football Playoff Projections
KSR Women's Basketball
Kentucky makes AP Top 25 Preseason Women's Basketball Poll