Appears they will both be in the CFP. This G5 non-sense needs to stop unless they're undefeated and it's clear they deserve a shot. James Madison lost to Louisville and Tulane got blown out by UT-San Antonio and Ole Miss.
Yes, this is not BB with March madness.Agreed. The G5 should just seed their own playoff and crown a G5 championship.
Iowa lost to Oregon by 2 on a last-second FG, to USC by five after, maybe, being a fraction of an inch from being first and goal in the last two minutes, to ISU by a last-second 54-yard FG after a flukey pass deflection, and to the #1 team in the nation 20-15 after being tied at 13 and missing a FG in the last two minutes. I would submit that Iowa has a better resume for the CFP than Alabama, to name one. If a three-loss Alabama is being considered, why not a 4-loss Iowa with its four losses coming as they did. Iowa is a handful of plays from being undefeated. Alabama? Not . . . so . . . much.I know we absolutely don’t belong in the CFP but I think we would EASILY pound both of those teams. Meanwhile we will be playing either Tennessee or Vanderbilt, both of whom would also annihilate these two teams, but have no chance of getting in either. Something is broken to be sure
Tulane could very well get another chancre get get blasted by Ole Miss. With JMU and Tulane both getting in, we're going to get two pretty good first round matchups and two absolute blowouts.Appears they will both be in the CFP. This G5 non-sense needs to stop unless they're undefeated and it's clear they deserve a shot. James Madison lost to Louisville and Tulane got blown out by UT-San Antonio and Ole Miss.
Bama also beat Georgia, Vanderbilt, and Tennessee.Iowa lost to Oregon by 2 on a last-second FG, to USC by five after, maybe, being a fraction of an inch from being first and goal in the last two minutes, to ISU by a last-second 54-yard FG after a flukey pass deflection, and to the #1 team in the nation 20-15 after being tied at 13 and missing a FG in the last two minutes. I would submit that Iowa has a better resume for the CFP than Alabama, to name one. If a three-loss Alabama is being considered, why not a 4-loss Iowa with its four losses coming as they did. Iowa is a handful of plays from being undefeated. Alabama? Not . . . so . . . much.
Iowa gave Indiana a tougher game than Ohio State did. 🫢Iowa lost to Oregon by 2 on a last-second FG, to USC by five after, maybe, being a fraction of an inch from being first and goal in the last two minutes, to ISU by a last-second 54-yard FG after a flukey pass deflection, and to the #1 team in the nation 20-15 after being tied at 13 and missing a FG in the last two minutes. I would submit that Iowa has a better resume for the CFP than Alabama, to name one. If a three-loss Alabama is being considered, why not a 4-loss Iowa with its four losses coming as they did. Iowa is a handful of plays from being undefeated. Alabama? Not . . . so . . . much.
This was the year, blows. Everything was there to compete with the big boys except a top 50 O.Iowa gave Indiana a tougher game than Ohio State did. 🫢
It should be a 24-team field, which has been proposed by the BIG but opposed by the SEC. A 24-team field would put FBS in line with every other level of college football, from D III on up, on the percentage of teams who make the playoffs. No "deserving" team would be left out of a 24-team field, although there would still be some controversy, it would be minimal and indefensible. Not so much with a 12-team field. And if Alabama is included, I hope whoever they play blows them away.The system is flawed. It was flawed back when we only had the top 4 teams compete as well. That said, I like having 12 teams get a shot vs only 4.
There are certainly valid arguments for what the criteria should be for who gets in. Perhaps "quality losses" and SOS should have greater weight?
No matter what, you have to draw the line somewhere and that means some teams are going to miss the cut and us fans get to voice our opinions about it. It's sports!
Iowa lost 4. Enough with the "we were close" stuff.Iowa lost to Oregon by 2 on a last-second FG, to USC by five after, maybe, being a fraction of an inch from being first and goal in the last two minutes, to ISU by a last-second 54-yard FG after a flukey pass deflection, and to the #1 team in the nation 20-15 after being tied at 13 and missing a FG in the last two minutes. I would submit that Iowa has a better resume for the CFP than Alabama, to name one. If a three-loss Alabama is being considered, why not a 4-loss Iowa with its four losses coming as they did. Iowa is a handful of plays from being undefeated. Alabama? Not . . . so . . . much.
Appears they will both be in the CFP. This G5 non-sense needs to stop unless they're undefeated and it's clear they deserve a shot. James Madison lost to Louisville and Tulane got blown out by UT-San Antonio and Ole Miss.
I agree 100%.It should be a 24-team field, which has been proposed by the BIG but opposed by the SEC. A 24-team field would put FBS in line with every other level of college football, from D III on up, on the percentage of teams who make the playoffs. No "deserving" team would be left out of a 24-team field, although there would still be some controversy, it would be minimal and indefensible. Not so much with a 12-team field. And if Alabama is included, I hope whoever they play blows them away.
Also the last two seasons…if we only had an offense with a pulse…This was the year, blows. Everything was there to compete with the big boys except a top 50 O.
(Passing game)
Yup, this ain’t the big dance where Cinderella can make an appearance…I think it is fun to think of these guys knocking some big time team out…. But it isn’t gonna happen
Doesn’t Oregon go to Tech after the first game? They will be an underdog there.Oregon has a pretty easy road for a deep run
Never was.If the goal is to get the best 12 teams into the playoffs, this doesn’t accomplish that.