Trump Retribution Fund.

Cheers

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
78,708
2,154
113
You understand the Government gets sued all the time right? It has to pay large sums annually for settlements and judgements. Your idiot tribe not doing what it did would have prevented this being a situation where it's going to be sued again.
Yes, agree. My cousin and her husband were both government attorneys. So if we already have money set aside to cover government defense and liability, why do we need this $2B fund?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Says Who? You? Trump? Can you address my questions above?

Yes, agree. My cousin and her husband were both government attorneys. So if we already have money set aside to cover government defense and liability, why do we need this $2B fund?

Your cousins aren't government attorneys or they would have already told you this isn't a hill to die on. Matter of fact you probably want to let it go and hope your favorite politicians stfu about it.

There's money budgeted every year for when the Government screws up. More information is going to come out. Certain people are going to have good cases and unfortunately even some shitheads are going to have good cases.

.
 
Last edited:

Cheers

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
78,708
2,154
113
Your cousins aren't government attorneys or they would have already told you this isn't a hill to die on. Matter of fact you probably want to let it go and hope your favorite politicians stfu about it.

There's money budgeted every year for when the Government screws up. More information is going to come out. Certain people are going to have good cases and unfortunately even some shitheads are going to have good cases.
Wrong again my Maga friend. They are both Federal Government attorneys. You just spew **** out and hope some of it holds a grain of truth. Why do we need this fund if we already hire attorneys to defend the government. What’s different about this fund? Are you going to be happy to support this fund with your tax dollars when a democratic administration is in office? Apparently so, because once it’s established, every administration going forward will fund and use this fund to help prosecute their enemies. It’s total BS. How does this help the American people?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Says Who? You? Trump? Can you address my questions above?

Your cousins aren't government attorneys or they would have already told you this isn't a hill to die on. Matter of fact you probably want to let it go and hope your favorite politicians stfu about it.

There's money budgeted every year for when the Government screws up. More information is going to come out. Certain people are going to have good cases and unfortunately even some shitheads are going to have good cases.

.

Hopefully Democrats keep running their mouths about it right until the midterms.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Wrong again my Maga friend. They are both Federal Government attorneys. You just spew **** out and hope some of it holds a grain of truth. Why do we need this fund if we already hire attorneys to defend the government. What’s different about this fund? Are you going to be happy to support this fund with your tax dollars when a democratic administration is in office? Apparently so, because once it’s established, every administration going forward will fund and use this fund to help prosecute their enemies. It’s total BS. How does this help the American people?

Like I said. You have no idea about how any of this **** works. But if your Democrat friends want to keep complaining about it knock yourselves out. You going to find out your voters aren't going to like this position regardless who the victim was.
 

Cheers

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
78,708
2,154
113
Like I said. You have no idea about how any of this **** works. But if your Democrat friends want to keep complaining about it knock yourselves out. You going to find out your voters aren't going to like this position regardless who the victim was.
Quit dodging the questions? As you pointed out, we already have money set aside for this. So why do we need this fund? And how does this help the American people?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Quit dodging the questions? As you pointed out, we already have money set aside for this. So why do we need this fund? And how does this help the American people?

I didn't dodge it dumbass. I explained the big picture to you numerous times but you don't want to accept that you idiots created a mess. You can't have informants incite violence. People are going to get paid. If you Democrats want to run on they shouldn't then please don't let me stop you.

Just don't go shoot up the White House up over it.






If this report is true the bystander is going to get paid. If not his family will. Hopefully he or she survives.
The terrorist though. I don't give give a **** about.


 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Cheers

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
I didn't dodge it dumbass. I explained the big picture to you numerous times but you don't want to accept that you idiots created a mess. You can't have informants incite violence. People are going to get paid. If you Democrats want to run on they shouldn't then please don't let me stop you.

Just don't go shoot up the White House up over it.






If this report is true the bystander is going to get paid. If not his family will. Hopefully he or she survives.
The terrorist though. I don't give give a **** about.



1779582146760.jpeg
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,650
7,811
113
Quit dodging the questions? As you pointed out, we already have money set aside for this. So why do we need this fund? And how does this help the American people?
Talk about dodging questions? That's all you've done since you started this stupid thread!

There would have been no need for the Jan 6th protests if the '20 election was on the complete up and up! You claim it was, yet you can't answer or explain a few simple questions that would easily validate your assertions.

For example:
If there really was a legitimate reason given to suspend all those vote counts, why can't you explain what it was? :unsure:

If all the votes were being properly certified and counted, why was there even a need to stop the vote counts in the first place? :unsure:

If all the J6 protesters were just sore losers & in fact properly treated, why are there any lawsuits pending against their improper handling at all? :unsure:

If Trump's tax returns were not illegally released, on what basis does he think he even has a case to sue the IRS for billions of dollars alleging they were in fact released illegally? :unsure:

If there's nothing to any of of these allegations, the 2B dollar settlement fund that's got your boxers all bunched up is really not even needed! If no one has any legitimate claims against the government, then you really have nothing to worry about, because no one will get a dime!

The fact you can't answer any of these common sense questions proves you know they are legitimate, and the fact you have no explanations refuting these claims proves there is in fact something behind them, which is the real reason why YOU are dodging these questions! :rolleyes:

Let it all play out in court. Then you can b-eye-itch about how much we may have to pay out. Maybe we can use the savings from all the billions in Democrat Federal program money laundering fraud we're uncovering to pay for the damage claims?

You wouldn't have a problem with that would 'ya? :sneaky:

@Cheers ...finally admitting to some common sense
 
Last edited:

SoCo

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,918
624
113
Huh? It's called a a settlement. The DOJ does it all the time. The last thing we should want are a bunch of cases In court over this. That is if you are really concerned about saving money.


People only need to go to Google and type in DOJ and financial settlements.
Those talking points sound good to sheep like you. The rest of us will handle this from here.

Thanks.
 

SoCo

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,918
624
113
This is my last post on the subject, because you and others have gone down a rabbit hole, and have gotten COMPLETELY off topic. Here is some information on how TRUMP tried to pressure the Georgia Secretary of State to illegally change the election. Thankfully, the Georgia SoS was smart enough to ignore his illegal and baseless request.

And before you start disputing the facts in the article, PLEASE go back to my original post regarding the $2B, Tax Payer Funded, Defense Fund. My post had NOTHING to do with the election. Thank You.


Not a fan of the $1.776B fund at all. If any victims file suit, let a jury determine the amount they deserve, not politicians. This looks bad all the way around.

The nicest thing I can say about this slush fund is that it is "only" costing the taxpayers $1.776B; rather than the slush funds to Ukraine and Iran that Obama, Biden and their cronies got generational wealth from which cost us taxpayers $350B and $7.6B, respectively.

Clearly Trump isn't as good at stealing taxpayer money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb

roadtrasheer

All-Conference
Sep 9, 2016
18,611
2,817
113
Not a fan of the $1.776B fund at all. If any victims file suit, let a jury determine the amount they deserve, not politicians. This looks bad all the way around.

The nicest thing I can say about this slush fund is that it is "only" costing the taxpayers $1.776B; rather than the slush funds to Ukraine and Iran that Obama, Biden and their cronies got generational wealth from which cost us taxpayers $350B and $7.6B, respectively.

Clearly Trump isn't as good at stealing taxpayer money.
Didn't Trump win 10 B lawsuit against the irs then decline it to set this fund up or am I wrong ?
I agree with you that setting the fund up is horse **** . amount is pennies compared to whats been going on . Its not fraud in my opinion. Whats going on around the country with Medicare/medicaid and S.S is blatant fraud........ not to mention usaid
 

SoCo

Senior
May 29, 2001
35,918
624
113
Didn't Trump win 10 B lawsuit against the irs then decline it to set this fund up or am I wrong ?
I agree with you that setting the fund up is horse **** . amount is pennies compared to whats been going on . Its not fraud in my opinion. Whats going on around the country with Medicare/medicaid and S.S is blatant fraud........ not to mention usaid
That's my unserstanding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer
May 23, 2009
11,267
801
113
Didn't Trump win 10 B lawsuit against the irs then decline it to set this fund up or am I wrong ?
I agree with you that setting the fund up is horse **** . amount is pennies compared to whats been going on . Its not fraud in my opinion. Whats going on around the country with Medicare/medicaid and S.S is blatant fraud........ not to mention usaid
Case was on its way to be dropped. Trump got ahead of it w this BS.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/24/trump-lawsuit-irs-00891894

“Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction,” Williams wrote in a four-page order. “It is unclear to this Court whether the Parties are sufficiently adverse to each other so as to satisfy [the Constitution’s] case or controversy requirement.”
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Those talking points sound good to sheep like you. The rest of us will handle this from here.

Thanks.

You are going to be attempting to "HANDLE IT" for the next several years. One more problem your dumbass tribe created that needs fixed.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Case was on its way to be dropped. Trump got ahead of it w this BS.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/24/trump-lawsuit-irs-00891894

“Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction,” Williams wrote in a four-page order. “It is unclear to this Court whether the Parties are sufficiently adverse to each other so as to satisfy [the Constitution’s] case or controversy requirement.”

Yes because Politico would know. Talking about feeding sheep.
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Lmao you can’t be helped - back to ignore

Ignoring me is why you still don't understand why this fund isn't just for Jan 6 but anyone can file a claim for abuse during the Biden and Garland period for anything that was unjust and it will be evaluated.
 
Last edited:

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Lmao you can’t be helped - back to ignore


Let's just agree individuals that work with foreign terrorist organization deserve the full weight of Justice.



If you are hoping your boy Piker will qualify for anything down the road the answer is no. Looking like he might have screwed up pretty bad here. Hope he ignores his subpoena. That will show them.










Probably connected. Hamas is the Designated Terrorist List.






Treasury Targets Flotilla Organizers and Muslim Brotherhood Networks Supporting Hamas​




 
Last edited:

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Let's just agree individuals that work with foreign terrorist organization deserve the full weight of Justice.



If you are hoping your boy Piker will qualify for anything down the road the answer is no. Looking like he might have screwed up pretty bad here. Hope he ignores his subpoena. That will show them.










Probably connected. Hamas is the Designated Terrorist List.






Treasury Targets Flotilla Organizers and Muslim Brotherhood Networks Supporting Hamas​








 
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,363
3,508
113
So you are ok with using $2B of tax payer dollars for this fund? And you are ok and realize that “if” this gets approved, which it likely won’t, that this would establish a dangerous precedent and EVERY administration going forward will likely appropriate Our Tax Dollars to support this legal defense fund. Who will decide who is eligible to receive support from the fund? And specifically, how does this fund help the American people? To me, this is completely ludicrous and a CLASSIC example of Waste, Fraud and Abuse of tax payer dollars.
You do understand it’s not a legal defense fund, right?

it’s a settlement fund.

and do you understand the difference?
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
You do understand it’s not a legal defense fund, right?

it’s a settlement fund.

and do you understand the difference?

They understand and are playing dumb. We dodged a bullet when Garland didn't make the Supreme Court. At least his damage as the Attorney General can be reversed.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113




And here it is: $1.776 billion of seditious conspiracy in seven minutes and 27 seconds, captured on videotape on American soil on Jan. 6. Undercover Metro Police and Capitol Police officers, dressed as Trump supporters, chanting “U.S.A.” and “Our house,” while encouraging protesters to climb scaffolding and walls, screaming, “Help ’em up! Help ’em up!” and “Push ’em up! Push ’em up!” Protester: “Now they’re letting everybody in—there ain’t nowhere to go.” MPD officer: “Yeah…” MPD officer: “This is… I think it’s—they’re going to trap everyone in.” Another MPD officer: “Yeah…”
 
  • Wow
Reactions: atlkvb

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
They ran it anyways to go after his voters and to not let him run again. They failed.






Top DNC officials—including former chair Donna Brazile and Pizzaman John Podesta—discussed how to overturn the U.S. government if Trump won. The exact phrase was: “Provoke a breakdown on January 6 to disrupt the proceedings and prevent the vote from going through.” They even said: We already have the assets in place. We already have military assets going to the Penn Walkway entrance. We already have back channels with Nancy Pelosi and Mark Milley. So we can use this to take down the U.S. government.
@MikeBenzCyber
“All of the major DNC apparatchiks, including Donna Brazile, the former head of the DNC, and John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager—who was later promoted to a $375 billion slush fund inside the Biden White House—planned a simulation about how to overturn the election results if Trump won, in, quote, ‘a clear Trump win.’ “As part of that plan, they planned to—I think the exact phrase was—‘provoke a breakdown on January 6 to disrupt the proceedings and prevent the vote from going through.’ “The addendum to that war-game exercise, called Will Trumpism Survive Trump Even if He Loses?, clearly laid out a necessity to create a predicate to go after Trump’s entire base—to, quote, ‘demobilize them, that they won’t automatically demobilize on their own.’ Some legal predicate was deemed necessary to target the entire base.” In other words, they did just that—January 6 was orchestrated to disrupt the official proceedings in an effort to prevent the actual crimes of November 3, 2020, from being presented. How’s that for an overthrow?


Ever wonder why certain individuals were not charged but some of their associates were?

 
Last edited:

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,650
7,811
113
Case was on its way to be dropped. Trump got ahead of it w this BS.

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/24/trump-lawsuit-irs-00891894

“Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction,” Williams wrote in a four-page order. “It is unclear to this Court whether the Parties are sufficiently adverse to each other so as to satisfy [the Constitution’s] case or controversy requirement.”
Can we see YOUR tax returns and how much you donated to the Democrat Socialists of America? 🤔

Trump has a case regardless of if he sues as a leader of the D.OJ. or as a private citizen!

His tax returns were illegally leaked.

Period.

Now go cry some more about why he's going to win his lawsuit and significant damages no matter how much whining you loser Democrats do. 🤫
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: roadtrasheer

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
Can we see YOUR tax returns and how mich you donated to the Democrat Socialists of America? 🤔

Trump has a case regardless of if he sues as a leader of the D.OJ. or as a private citizen!

His tax returns were illegally leaked.

Period.

Now go cry some more about why he's going to win his lawsuit and significant damages no matter how much whining you loser Democrats do. 🤫

He sounds more like a receiver than a giver.
 
May 23, 2009
11,267
801
113
Can we see YOUR tax returns and how mich you donated to the Democrat Socialists of America? 🤔

Trump has a case regardless of if he sues as a leader of the D.OJ. or as a private citizen!

His tax returns were illegally leaked.

Period.

Now go cry some more about why he's going to win his lawsuit and significant damages no matter how much whining you loser Democrats
OP indicated he won his case which he did not. It did not have a chance when you’re filing as President against the very agency you oversee, which is why he had his own admin strike a settlement on his behalf before there was any judicial resolution. We’re inventing new levels of executive corruption at this point, which is a dangerous precedent to set. You’re on board today because you’re a fan boy but it may not always be that way.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
83,650
7,811
113
OP indicated he won his case which he did not. It did not have a chance as the judge overseeing the case questioned, which is why he had his own admin strike a settlement on his behalf before there was any judicial resolution. We’re inventing new levels of executive corruption at this point, which is a dangerous precedent to set. You’re on board today because you’re a fan boy but it may not always be that way.
Nice try. I'm on board because Trump's tax returns had no business being released by anyone in the first place, and I absolutely enjoy the Hell out of how thoroughly he kicks your loser Leftist azzes every time you try something illegal to defeat him!

Now get ready to cry some more over the next Trump "Lawfare" azz kickin' comin' your way. Loser. :ROFLMAO:

Wait 'till we start prosecuting all their illegal fraud!

I know DJT, you might run out of court space! :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
May 23, 2009
11,267
801
113
Nice try. I'm on board because Trump's tax returns had no business being released to anyone in the first place, and I absolutely enjoy the Hell out of how thoroughly he kicks your loser Leftist azzes every time you try something illegal to defeat him!

Now get ready to cry some more over the next Trump "Lawfare" azz kickin' comin' your way. Loser. :ROFLMAO:

Wait 'till we start prosecuting all their illegal fraud!

I know DJT, you might run out of court space! :ROFLMAO:
As I said, just a fan boy
 

Gunny46

All-Conference
Jul 2, 2018
62,336
4,555
113
OP indicated he won his case which he did not. It did not have a chance when you’re filing as President against the very agency you oversee, which is why he had his own admin strike a settlement on his behalf before there was any judicial resolution. We’re inventing new levels of executive corruption at this point, which is a dangerous precedent to set. You’re on board today because you’re a fan boy but it may not always be that way.

You should be more concerned about this 1.7 Billion. Turns out that was money that shouldn't have been sent. In Cash too?




Obama administration acknowledges $1.7B transfer to Iran was all cash​

 
Last edited:
  • Angry
Reactions: atlkvb