There are some who should have been prosecuted, under the correct rules.
The informants would have been a good start.
There are some who should have been prosecuted, under the correct rules.
Says Who? You? Trump? Can you address my questions above?There are some who should have been prosecuted, under the correct rules.
Yes, agree. My cousin and her husband were both government attorneys. So if we already have money set aside to cover government defense and liability, why do we need this $2B fund?You understand the Government gets sued all the time right? It has to pay large sums annually for settlements and judgements. Your idiot tribe not doing what it did would have prevented this being a situation where it's going to be sued again.
Says Who? You? Trump? Can you address my questions above?
Yes, agree. My cousin and her husband were both government attorneys. So if we already have money set aside to cover government defense and liability, why do we need this $2B fund?
Wrong again my Maga friend. They are both Federal Government attorneys. You just spew **** out and hope some of it holds a grain of truth. Why do we need this fund if we already hire attorneys to defend the government. What’s different about this fund? Are you going to be happy to support this fund with your tax dollars when a democratic administration is in office? Apparently so, because once it’s established, every administration going forward will fund and use this fund to help prosecute their enemies. It’s total BS. How does this help the American people?Your cousins aren't government attorneys or they would have already told you this isn't a hill to die on. Matter of fact you probably want to let it go and hope your favorite politicians stfu about it.
There's money budgeted every year for when the Government screws up. More information is going to come out. Certain people are going to have good cases and unfortunately even some shitheads are going to have good cases.
Says Who? You? Trump? Can you address my questions above?
Your cousins aren't government attorneys or they would have already told you this isn't a hill to die on. Matter of fact you probably want to let it go and hope your favorite politicians stfu about it.
There's money budgeted every year for when the Government screws up. More information is going to come out. Certain people are going to have good cases and unfortunately even some shitheads are going to have good cases.
.
Wrong again my Maga friend. They are both Federal Government attorneys. You just spew **** out and hope some of it holds a grain of truth. Why do we need this fund if we already hire attorneys to defend the government. What’s different about this fund? Are you going to be happy to support this fund with your tax dollars when a democratic administration is in office? Apparently so, because once it’s established, every administration going forward will fund and use this fund to help prosecute their enemies. It’s total BS. How does this help the American people?
Quit dodging the questions? As you pointed out, we already have money set aside for this. So why do we need this fund? And how does this help the American people?Like I said. You have no idea about how any of this **** works. But if your Democrat friends want to keep complaining about it knock yourselves out. You going to find out your voters aren't going to like this position regardless who the victim was.
Quit dodging the questions? As you pointed out, we already have money set aside for this. So why do we need this fund? And how does this help the American people?
I didn't dodge it dumbass. I explained the big picture to you numerous times but you don't want to accept that you idiots created a mess. You can't have informants incite violence. People are going to get paid. If you Democrats want to run on they shouldn't then please don't let me stop you.
Just don't go shoot up the White House up over it.
If this report is true the bystander is going to get paid. If not his family will. Hopefully he or she survives.
The terrorist though. I don't give give a **** about.

Talk about dodging questions? That's all you've done since you started this stupid thread!Quit dodging the questions? As you pointed out, we already have money set aside for this. So why do we need this fund? And how does this help the American people?
Those talking points sound good to sheep like you. The rest of us will handle this from here.Huh? It's called a a settlement. The DOJ does it all the time. The last thing we should want are a bunch of cases In court over this. That is if you are really concerned about saving money.
People only need to go to Google and type in DOJ and financial settlements.
This is my last post on the subject, because you and others have gone down a rabbit hole, and have gotten COMPLETELY off topic. Here is some information on how TRUMP tried to pressure the Georgia Secretary of State to illegally change the election. Thankfully, the Georgia SoS was smart enough to ignore his illegal and baseless request.
And before you start disputing the facts in the article, PLEASE go back to my original post regarding the $2B, Tax Payer Funded, Defense Fund. My post had NOTHING to do with the election. Thank You.
![]()
Fact Check: Trump’s Georgia Call to Raffensperger
The former president made a slew of false claims in asking the Georgia secretary of state to overturn the 2020 election results.www.brennancenter.org
Didn't Trump win 10 B lawsuit against the irs then decline it to set this fund up or am I wrong ?Not a fan of the $1.776B fund at all. If any victims file suit, let a jury determine the amount they deserve, not politicians. This looks bad all the way around.
The nicest thing I can say about this slush fund is that it is "only" costing the taxpayers $1.776B; rather than the slush funds to Ukraine and Iran that Obama, Biden and their cronies got generational wealth from which cost us taxpayers $350B and $7.6B, respectively.
Clearly Trump isn't as good at stealing taxpayer money.
That's my unserstanding.Didn't Trump win 10 B lawsuit against the irs then decline it to set this fund up or am I wrong ?
I agree with you that setting the fund up is horse **** . amount is pennies compared to whats been going on . Its not fraud in my opinion. Whats going on around the country with Medicare/medicaid and S.S is blatant fraud........ not to mention usaid
Case was on its way to be dropped. Trump got ahead of it w this BS.Didn't Trump win 10 B lawsuit against the irs then decline it to set this fund up or am I wrong ?
I agree with you that setting the fund up is horse **** . amount is pennies compared to whats been going on . Its not fraud in my opinion. Whats going on around the country with Medicare/medicaid and S.S is blatant fraud........ not to mention usaid
Those talking points sound good to sheep like you. The rest of us will handle this from here.
Thanks.
Case was on its way to be dropped. Trump got ahead of it w this BS.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/24/trump-lawsuit-irs-00891894
“Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction,” Williams wrote in a four-page order. “It is unclear to this Court whether the Parties are sufficiently adverse to each other so as to satisfy [the Constitution’s] case or controversy requirement.”
That’s a quote directly from the judge overseeing the case. Fake news isn’t a valid defense every time you disagree w something.Yes because Politico would know. Talking about feeding sheep.
That’s a quote directly from the judge overseeing the case. Fake news isn’t a valid defense every time you disagree w something.
Lmao you can’t be helped - back to ignoreStop being retarded. He was going to win the case. Hence why this idiot was sentenced to prison.
Former IRS Contractor Sentenced for Disclosing Tax Return Information to News Organizations
Lmao you can’t be helped - back to ignore
Lmao you can’t be helped - back to ignore
Lmao you can’t be helped - back to ignore
Let's just agree individuals that work with foreign terrorist organization deserve the full weight of Justice.
If you are hoping your boy Piker will qualify for anything down the road the answer is no. Looking like he might have screwed up pretty bad here. Hope he ignores his subpoena. That will show them.
Probably connected. Hamas is the Designated Terrorist List.
Treasury Targets Flotilla Organizers and Muslim Brotherhood Networks Supporting Hamas
You do understand it’s not a legal defense fund, right?So you are ok with using $2B of tax payer dollars for this fund? And you are ok and realize that “if” this gets approved, which it likely won’t, that this would establish a dangerous precedent and EVERY administration going forward will likely appropriate Our Tax Dollars to support this legal defense fund. Who will decide who is eligible to receive support from the fund? And specifically, how does this fund help the American people? To me, this is completely ludicrous and a CLASSIC example of Waste, Fraud and Abuse of tax payer dollars.
You do understand it’s not a legal defense fund, right?
it’s a settlement fund.
and do you understand the difference?
Can we see YOUR tax returns and how much you donated to the Democrat Socialists of America?Case was on its way to be dropped. Trump got ahead of it w this BS.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/24/trump-lawsuit-irs-00891894
“Although President Trump avers that he is bringing this lawsuit in his personal capacity, he is the sitting president and his named adversaries are entities whose decisions are subject to his direction,” Williams wrote in a four-page order. “It is unclear to this Court whether the Parties are sufficiently adverse to each other so as to satisfy [the Constitution’s] case or controversy requirement.”
Can we see YOUR tax returns and how mich you donated to the Democrat Socialists of America?
Trump has a case regardless of if he sues as a leader of the D.OJ. or as a private citizen!
His tax returns were illegally leaked.
Period.
Now go cry some more about why he's going to win his lawsuit and significant damages no matter how much whining you loser Democrats do.![]()
OP indicated he won his case which he did not. It did not have a chance when you’re filing as President against the very agency you oversee, which is why he had his own admin strike a settlement on his behalf before there was any judicial resolution. We’re inventing new levels of executive corruption at this point, which is a dangerous precedent to set. You’re on board today because you’re a fan boy but it may not always be that way.Can we see YOUR tax returns and how mich you donated to the Democrat Socialists of America?
Trump has a case regardless of if he sues as a leader of the D.OJ. or as a private citizen!
His tax returns were illegally leaked.
Period.
Now go cry some more about why he's going to win his lawsuit and significant damages no matter how much whining you loser Democrats
Nice try. I'm on board because Trump's tax returns had no business being released by anyone in the first place, and I absolutely enjoy the Hell out of how thoroughly he kicks your loser Leftist azzes every time you try something illegal to defeat him!OP indicated he won his case which he did not. It did not have a chance as the judge overseeing the case questioned, which is why he had his own admin strike a settlement on his behalf before there was any judicial resolution. We’re inventing new levels of executive corruption at this point, which is a dangerous precedent to set. You’re on board today because you’re a fan boy but it may not always be that way.
As I said, just a fan boyNice try. I'm on board because Trump's tax returns had no business being released to anyone in the first place, and I absolutely enjoy the Hell out of how thoroughly he kicks your loser Leftist azzes every time you try something illegal to defeat him!
Now get ready to cry some more over the next Trump "Lawfare" azz kickin' comin' your way. Loser.
Wait 'till we start prosecuting all their illegal fraud!
![]()
I know DJT, you might run out of court space!![]()
OP indicated he won his case which he did not. It did not have a chance when you’re filing as President against the very agency you oversee, which is why he had his own admin strike a settlement on his behalf before there was any judicial resolution. We’re inventing new levels of executive corruption at this point, which is a dangerous precedent to set. You’re on board today because you’re a fan boy but it may not always be that way.
Just as I said...crybaby Leftist loser!As I said, just a fan boy