It doesn't necessarily hurt anything, but here is the reasoning, and I do flip flop between these two ideas.
Idea 1, Continue to demand excellence, and the way it used to be done, (which by the way, no coach, except maybe Bo, has tried to sort of use Tom Osbornes old formula). I don't think Tim Beck or Shawn Watson truly wanted a running offense. The thinking is, look, There is a clue on how it used to be done here. It's actually maddening to see Wisconsin basically use our old formula with success year after year.
Idea 2. Completely punt. Flush all the old stuff down the drain. We already flushed the old conferences (big 8 and 12) and flushed all our history, many records fell the past 20 years under Callahan and more. No more consecutive bowl game record, and I don't know how many stats and internal records we had, but most of those things have disappeared. The sellout record isn't very real either. It's manufactured, but it is the very last little thing we can hold on to the past with as fans.
So just get rid of it, accept mediocrity, and somehow hope that removed expectations will allow the program to regrow new roots.
I'm not on Idea #2 as often as I cling to idea #1, but I was when I posted that.
I honestly believe any coach with half a brain, can go back to Tom's formula and make it work, it just seems none of them are actually willing to do that.
Maybe the new Offensive Coordinator will help Scott actually see things with a fresh set of eyes, but if it's going to be the same garbage, then I will be more than happy to get a coach in here that wants to follow the formula.
If it's better to do Idea 2, then I'll prob just find something else to do with my time quite honestly. Maybe that will work someday for another generation.