My Critique on the IT decisions
I graduated from MSU in '94 with a MIS degree and have worked with large scale IT systems ever since. I now run a web programming shop where we deal with some of our companies web infrastructure. The choice of NeuLion has been a bust from a technical perspective. The site is poorly designed and has always run like crap. They use a lot of synchronous updating that could easily be done asynchronous which is sloppy and just reeks of bad programming. The site looks pretty good, but the look is by far the easiest part of a site. The choice to do this video series the way it is done is absolutely ridiculous. There is a very good reason that people put stuff on YouTube. It is very, very hard to stream video well. You need huge data pipes, you need a very well done viewer that can handle variations/fluctuations in client data speeds, you need enough mirrors to push the stream to the max capacity of your pipe.
I have a fiber, business class connection and live in the middle of Memphis not far from my local termination point. There is absolutely no reason I would not be able to see a video like this in full HD without any hesitation or signal loss. But this video not only has signal loss, it is downgraded to the point I have artifacts constantly during playback. The video pauses in random spots for streaming to catch up, and twice playback stopped and I had to restart it. At some point MSU has to just admit that this NeuLion deal was not a great decision and quit doubling down into this bad technology and programming. I'm sure there is a contract in place but I would hope that we still could host videos on YouTube and not be stuck with the poor capabilities of the NeuLion viewer/stream. If we are going to stay with NeuLion someone really needs to audit their capabilities. Video is hard, way more difficult than pushing text or images or programming, and the people we have right now can't do it right. They really need to put stuff back on YouTube. /rant