The New Lounge

[KDSTONE]

Here you go, again. Are all true movies 100% spot on? I didn't think so. Should it discredit the actual severity of human trafiicking. Had you and your two followers, answered something like " the movie was highly fictionalized, but it is a very serious issue, there wouldn't have been the blowback there was.

And man, you and your prodigal son have a major hard on for Epstein. Like I said though, IF the files get released, there will be a lot of disappointed people. We may have to put @DuckDevil in a round, padded room.

It’s a diversion tactic. Rather than focusing on Biden’s failed border policies and Boogie’s unorthodox style of defending them, it pivots the conversation to an admittedly flawed movie that’s neither pivotal to the case we’re making or even particularly relevant at this point. It’s a red herring. I considered seeing it but ended up at some rom com most likely. Liked Cabiezel’s work in Person of Interest, with Michael Emerson from Lost. About the creation of an AI surveillance program and the resulting chaos and moral dilemmas that ensue.

 

[DuckDevil]

 

[BOOGIEMAN1914]

So...reflecting pool "flawed installation"...not vandals with video proof, not 100ft gashes or 300ft gashes perpetrated by sick people

 

[DuckDevil]

So...reflecting pool "flawed installation"...not vandals with video proof, not 100ft gashes or 300ft gashes perpetrated by sick people

A lie for rubes/pedophile protectors. He knows they’ll believe whatever he says at the end of the day.

 

[DuckDevil]

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

I’ve taught with people like Datt. They’re some miserable people. He will probably teach for 40 years so that he can try to feel superior to others.

30 and counting. Thank you for your service, coach.

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

Here you go, again. Are all true movies 100% spot on? I didn't think so. Should it discredit the actual severity of human trafiicking. Had you and your two followers, answered something like " the movie was highly fictionalized, but it is a very serious issue, there wouldn't have been the blowback there was.

And man, you and your prodigal son have a major hard on for Epstein. Like I said though, IF the files get released, there will be a lot of disappointed people. We may have to put @DuckDevil in a round, padded room.

When did I set the bar at 100%?
I never discredited human trafficking. I discredited a highly fictionalized movie about a disgraced former govt agent and I discredited you.
And lol at you trying to give me any advice about using words.

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

It’s a diversion tactic.

All it took was dismissing a movie he touted as if it were an investigative journalism documentary a single time and mac took on the diversion all by himself.

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

IF the files get released, there will be a lot of disappointed people. We may have to put @DuckDevil in a round, padded room.

I don't believe any of these type pics, videos...you post. They are done by people who hate Trump, so there's a major bias, and they've probably been doctored. I have been clear about the Epstein files, and I've said MULTIPLE TIMES I wish they'd release them

You have the gall to ask if we would support prosecution of people from "our side" in the Epstein Files -- multiple times, despite being answered clearly -- yet here you are already concluding that they are doctored to implicate our President unjustly or/and that they will exonerate your side. Pretty much gives the lie to your claiming you want them released when you've already set up your rejection of results you don't like. Kinda like accepting the results of the election "...if I win." How is this the fair and balanced, non-sheep behavior you brag about?

 

[Mac9192]

You have the gall to ask if we would support prosecution of people from "our side" in the Epstein Files -- multiple times, despite being answered clearly -- yet here you are already concluding that they are doctored to implicate our President unjustly or/and that they will exonerate your side. Pretty much gives the lie to your claiming you want them released when you've already set up your rejection of results you don't like. Kinda like accepting the results of the election "...if I win." How is this the fair and balanced, non-sheep behavior you brag about?

Yes I have “the gall” to ask you because I read your posts. We told you libs the media was crooked years ago. Then it was proven. You guys go right back to believing what you’re told as if that never happened. So yes, I think you’ll be extremely surprised and disappointed if the Epstein files are released. I don’t think Trump is guilty, but if he is, I’d be done with him. Your boy lil Duckey thinks Trump is the only one, and you eat it up.

You guys refuse to accept how crooked “they” were to have Biden as the President, and what Fauci did to this country. But hey, that was a highly fictionalized movie, and Trump is the blame for the way things are. Every President before him did a great job.

 

[DuckDevil]

Yes I have “the gall” to ask you because I read your posts. We told you libs the media was crooked years ago. Then it was proven. You guys go right back to believing what you’re told as if that never happened. So yes, I think you’ll be extremely surprised and disappointed if the Epstein files are released. I don’t think Trump is guilty, but if he is, I’d be done with him. Your boy lil Duckey thinks Trump is the only one, and you eat it up.

You guys refuse to accept how crooked “they” were to have Biden as the President, and what Fauci did to this country. But hey, that was a highly fictionalized movie, and Trump is the blame for the way things are. Every President before him did a great job.

Trump was president during the lockdowns, not Fauci or Biden. Can you explain why you’ve decided that Trump deserves no blame for the things you complain about?

 

[DuckDevil]

 

[DuckDevil]

This is a great example of how he handles the rubes/pedophilia proponents who still support him.

They tell the truth in their legal filings because they have to, while he simultaneously lies to the base through social media, giving himself cover, knowing that they’ll never question anything he says.

You can’t really blame him though if it works time and time again.

 

[BOOGIEMAN1914]

Yet he criticized just Minnesota and claimed he didn't think it was Iran and it was Minnys fault

 

[BOOGIEMAN1914]

This is a great example of how he handles the rubes/pedophilia proponents who still support him.

They tell the truth in their legal filings because they have to, while he simultaneously lies to the base through social media, giving himself cover, knowing that they’ll never question anything he says.

You can’t really blame him though if it works time and time again.

Hook line and sinker....

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

Yes I have “the gall” to ask you because I read your posts. We told you libs the media was crooked years ago. Then it was proven. You guys go right back to believing what you’re told as if that never happened. So yes, I think you’ll be extremely surprised and disappointed if the Epstein files are released. I don’t think Trump is guilty, but if he is, I’d be done with him. Your boy lil Duckey thinks Trump is the only one, and you eat it up.

You guys refuse to accept how crooked “they” were to have Biden as the President, and what Fauci did to this country. But hey, that was a highly fictionalized movie, and Trump is the blame for the way things are. Every President before him did a great job.

The gall is not just the asking. It's the clear hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance: you claim you would be in favor of prosecuting your side, but you're already setting up a rejection of those results. You would want them prosecuted... but it's all doctored and made up. You will make excuses for our President just like you have with the war in Iran, gas prices, cost of groceries, the ballroom, and more.

The media is compromised and flawed, not crooked. You believe everything in the media you don't like is an inherent lie.

So one moment @DuckDevil is my minion... and now I cling to his every word. You can't even keep your lowbrow insults consistent.

Dr Fauci is a heroic, flawed scientist. He's being scapegoated because President Trump turned on him and told you to, as well. Covid was a worldwide epidemic. You would rather believe he is some easy, single person to point to to blame for everything that went wrong than to even attempt to deal with the systemic failure across the board and around the world. It's kinda like how President Biden was alternately an evil mastermind and a vegetable. You can't keep your accusations any straighter than your insults.

I think it embarrassed you when it was pointed out that a movie you were very moved by and thought was a homerun was actually highly fictionalized, so you lashed out in anger and claimed that we're just as bad as pedophiles when it is very clearly your side that is more protective of pedophiles.

Whoever is President often gets blamed for things that are far more complicated. It only bothers you that the same is true for President Trump. You take your marching orders directly from him, and he complains that every criticism of him is completely made up and unfair.

"Every President before him did a great job." Yet another extremist, hyperbolic strawman.

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

Except in blue states, where it is the fault of any Democrat our President can point at.

 

[KDSTONE]

The gall is not just the asking. It's the clear hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance: you claim you would be in favor of prosecuting your side, but you're already setting up a rejection of those results. You would want them prosecuted... but it's all doctored and made up. You will make excuses for our President just like you have with the war in Iran, gas prices, cost of groceries, the ballroom, and more.

The media is compromised and flawed, not crooked. You believe everything in the media you don't like is an inherent lie.

So one moment @DuckDevil is my minion... and now I cling to his every word. You can't even keep your lowbrow insults consistent.

Dr Fauci is a heroic, flawed scientist. He's being scapegoated because President Trump turned on him and told you to, as well. Covid was a worldwide epidemic. You would rather believe he is some easy, single person to point to to blame for everything that went wrong than to even attempt to deal with the systemic failure across the board and around the world. It's kinda like how President Biden was alternately an evil mastermind and a vegetable. You can't keep your accusations any straighter than your insults.

I think it embarrassed you when it was pointed out that a movie you were very moved by and thought was a homerun was actually highly fictionalized, so you lashed out in anger and claimed that we're just as bad as pedophiles when it is very clearly your side that is more protective of pedophiles.

Whoever is President often gets blamed for things that are far more complicated. It only bothers you that the same is true for President Trump. You take your marching orders directly from him, and he complains that every criticism of him is completely made up and unfair.

"Every President before him did a great job." Yet another extremist, hyperbolic strawman.

He “ complains that every criticism of him is completely made up and unfair”. Of course he does. Narcissism and paranoia are closely linked. To be fair, when was the last time a sitting POTUS stood in front of a mic and said “ Yeh I screwed up. This one’s on me”. Re: the Epstein Files, it’s clear that Kash Patel is not going to touch that investigation of the 13 year old with a ten foot pole. In your view, going forward assuming the Dems win the House, how should this matter proceed? The Left already presumes him guilty. Most of the Right will deem any investigation of Trump re the Files as a politically partisan witch hunt. So we’re talking about Indep and moderates on both sides at this point. What would be the most impartial, accusations of bias resistant way to go forward?

 

[Ghost of Dattier]

He “ complains that every criticism of him is completely made up and unfair”. Of course he does. Narcissism and paranoia are closely linked. To be fair, when was the last time a sitting POTUS stood in front of a mic and said “ Yeh I screwed up. This one’s on me”. Re: the Epstein Files, it’s clear that Kash Patel is not going to touch that investigation of the 13 year old with a ten foot pole. In your view, going forward assuming the Dems win the House, how should this matter proceed? The Left already presumes him guilty. Most of the Right will deem any investigation of Trump re the Files as a politically partisan witch hunt. So we’re talking about Indep and moderates on both sides at this point. What would be the most impartial, accusations of bias resistant way to go forward?

To be fair, I know of no other President who goes after every tiny criticism, or who turns every challenging question from a reporter into personal insults, or who so blatently weaponizes DoJ against political enemies.
When Dems take the House, there will be an investigation of our President specifically. I do not support jumping to a conclusion about what that will result in. President Trump will effectively be a lame duck and the GOP will start distancing themselves from him. There will not be as many GOP voices gaslighting the nation with him.

 

[KDSTONE]

Hook line and sinker...

Awww. Look who’s pivoted from talking about child trafficking ( good idea) to reflecting pools.

 

[Mac9192]

What bothers me? The media has been proven to be liars. It's that simple. They have lied so much since 2016. They lied before then, but those on right didn't realize it how bad until Trump would just light into them. Was it Presidential? No, but all we've had before him were spray painted turds. But on Trump, I'd give him a C, maybe C- so far. He's only a little over a year and a half in. Unless they kill him. Which they've tried a couple times, along with Covid, and impeachments... All to silence him.

To make it worse, they propped up Biden (Weekend at Bernie's) for over four years, and tried selling him as the President. Our 3 stooges here don't see any issue with that though. And we're supposed to take them serious?

 

[KDSTONE]

To be fair, I know of no other President who goes after every tiny criticism, or who turns every challenging question from a reporter into personal insults, or who so blatently weaponizes DoJ against political enemies.
When Dems take the House, there will be an investigation of our President specifically. I do not support jumping to a conclusion about what that will result in. President Trump will effectively be a lame duck and the GOP will start distancing themselves from him. There will not be as many GOP voices gaslighting the nation with him.

You didn’t answer the question. Of course there will be an investigation. How can it appear credible and impartial? was my question.
“ I do not support jumping to a conclusion”….
Oh please. Is that why you’ve been calling Rep pedo supporters for months? Because you don’t “ jump to conclusions”.
A “ let’s get to the bottom of it” spirit is a far cry from “ some allegations were made. Y’all are a bunch of pedophiles!” This is the level of discourse our nation has been reduced to.
I wouldn’t count my eggs just yet re: the House. You would think so, but the Dems are going bat **** crazy right before our eyes. Cozying up to Defund the Police and Open Borders DSA lunatics is a recipe for getting people who wouldn’t normally vote to the polls. Your moderate and sane wing of the Dem Party might want to grow a pair and soon.

 

[KDSTONE]

Double post.