Agree with this but RU should have won by 20+ with all the missed chippies, fts and TO.I thought their two best players Langford and Morgan were more talented than anyone on our team but we had way way more depth in terms of talent.
I thought their two best players Langford and Morgan were more talented than anyone on our team but we had way way more depth in terms of talent.
We currently do have a winning record.Rutgers would have a winning record with a Langford type go to scorer .
RU is the better coached team, Indiana may have a couple players with the most talent but that gets you nowhere when you do not have the rest of the players settling into their rolls
second game in a row that Pike coached the pants off of Archie with in game adjustments
Athletic and talent aren't the same thing. Basketball involves more than just athleticism. Indiana looked surprisingly lacking in talent.Very sorry to say , but we are not clearly more talented. We’re getting better and getting some better players , but Indiana was the more athletic team.
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football HC Greg Schiano's Wisconsin Postgame Press Conference
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Postgame Show: Wisconsin Badgers Edition - TKR Pod
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football falls to Wisconsin, eliminated from Bowl Eligibility
The Knight Report
Rutgers Football Injury Report: Latest ahead of the Wisconsin game
Women's Sports
Top 2027 recruit Ashley Maccalla commits to Rutgers