The Great Replacement

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
23,620
21,998
113
The fact is what exactly?

Please explain in detail.
The term “replaced” often carries connotations of a deliberate or conspiratorial process, but based on demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau, what we’re seeing is a gradual shift in the racial composition of the U.S. population due to natural factors like differing birth rates, immigration patterns, aging populations, and changes in how people self-identify on censuses (e.g., more individuals identifying as multiracial). 0 There is no evidence of any orchestrated “replacement” of white people; instead, the data reflects ongoing societal changes.


Here’s a breakdown of the key facts:


  • Historical Trends: In 1990, non-Hispanic white people made up about 76% of the U.S. population. This fell to 72% in 2000, 64% in 2010, and 58% in 2020 (based on the “White alone, non-Hispanic” category). 7 By 2023, it was still around 58%. 17
  • Recent Changes (2020-2024): The 2020 Census showed the non-Hispanic white population at 57.8% (191 million people), down from 63.7% in 2010. 0 Estimates for 2024 suggest it has continued to decline slightly to about 56-58%, with the absolute number hovering around 191-195 million amid overall population growth to 340 million. 18 16 Much of the apparent drop between censuses is also due to methodological changes, such as more people identifying as multiracial (e.g., a 316% increase in those identifying as white in combination with other races from 2010 to 2020). 4

To illustrate the shifts visually, here’s a chart comparing racial demographics between 2010 and 2020: 0 “LARGE”


  • Projections: The Census Bureau projects that non-Hispanic white people will become less than 50% of the population around 2045, comprising about 49.7% by then, while Hispanic (24.6%), Black (13.1%), Asian (7.9%), and multiracial populations continue to grow. 5 This is driven by higher fertility rates and immigration among non-white groups, alongside an aging non-Hispanic white population experiencing more deaths than births. 16

These changes are part of broader global demographic patterns seen in many developed countries, influenced by economic, social, and policy factors rather than any targeted effort. If you’re interested in specific aspects like regional variations or causes, let me know for more details.
 

TheValley91

Heisman
Jan 20, 2013
20,717
18,115
97
The term “replaced” often carries connotations of a deliberate or conspiratorial process, but based on demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau, what we’re seeing is a gradual shift in the racial composition of the U.S. population due to natural factors like differing birth rates, immigration patterns, aging populations, and changes in how people self-identify on censuses (e.g., more individuals identifying as multiracial). 0 There is no evidence of any orchestrated “replacement” of white people; instead, the data reflects ongoing societal changes.


Here’s a breakdown of the key facts:


  • Historical Trends: In 1990, non-Hispanic white people made up about 76% of the U.S. population. This fell to 72% in 2000, 64% in 2010, and 58% in 2020 (based on the “White alone, non-Hispanic” category). 7 By 2023, it was still around 58%. 17
  • Recent Changes (2020-2024): The 2020 Census showed the non-Hispanic white population at 57.8% (191 million people), down from 63.7% in 2010. 0 Estimates for 2024 suggest it has continued to decline slightly to about 56-58%, with the absolute number hovering around 191-195 million amid overall population growth to 340 million. 18 16 Much of the apparent drop between censuses is also due to methodological changes, such as more people identifying as multiracial (e.g., a 316% increase in those identifying as white in combination with other races from 2010 to 2020). 4

To illustrate the shifts visually, here’s a chart comparing racial demographics between 2010 and 2020: 0 “LARGE”


  • Projections: The Census Bureau projects that non-Hispanic white people will become less than 50% of the population around 2045, comprising about 49.7% by then, while Hispanic (24.6%), Black (13.1%), Asian (7.9%), and multiracial populations continue to grow. 5 This is driven by higher fertility rates and immigration among non-white groups, alongside an aging non-Hispanic white population experiencing more deaths than births. 16

These changes are part of broader global demographic patterns seen in many developed countries, influenced by economic, social, and policy factors rather than any targeted effort. If you’re interested in specific aspects like regional variations or causes, let me know for more details.
So you copied and pasted something from AI, it refutes the "great replacement theory", and now we know you block/unblock people depending on the day. Good stuff.
 

baltimorened

All-Conference
May 29, 2001
5,164
3,750
113
People (citizens and non-citizens alike) who derive income from U.S. sources pay both the U.S. federal government and one or more state governments an income tax on that income. With the possible exception of gift and estate taxes (which apply to a fraction of 1% of the U.S. population), a taxpayer's after tax income is not subjected to a second tax. But taxing remittances would do just that, and it would do it to a small cross section of the U.S. workforce (i.e., resident aliens), a cross section that is already on the very low end of the income earning spectrum.

Moreover, taxing remittances is essentially taxing behavior. ("Those damn aliens, how dare they come here and take relatively low paying jobs most U.S. citizens refuse to take!! Forget about the U.S. employers who hire them at low hourly wages. They didn't do anything wrong. We need to find a way to penalize those (literally) poor bastards who are here working in those jobs. Let's tax their remittances.")
yea I know all about taxes, I pay a lot of them...

In your second paragraph, you missed my point. If there is an undocumented migrant on the country working then by definition he/she is breaking the law. All the other stuff - jobs Americans won't do, taking jobs from americans, what about the employers - is just talking points. If someone is breaking the law, they not only should not be remitting monies to another country, they should be deported. Now, for employers hiring undocumented workers..they should also be punished. And in my opinion hefty fines and jail time might send a message that this behavior will not be tolerated.

Why do we have laws if we're not going to enforce them?
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,348
3,370
93
No it very clearly says white people are being replaced. It’s not a theory. You can argue good or bad, but you have to admit that it is happening.
Let me ask you a question, and just humor me, but if all the illegals were round up and kicked out of the country and the boarder was 100% secure and all the folks that were left were legal, US citizens and all the non-white US citizens started having children at a higher clip than the white ones, basically reducing the percentage of the population that was white, then would this also be a "Great Replacement Theory" as well?
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

TheValley91

Heisman
Jan 20, 2013
20,717
18,115
97
No it very clearly says white people are being replaced. It’s not a theory. You can argue good or bad, but you have to admit that it is happening.
Highlight the portion where it says white people are being replaced.

You seem to have misread this portion of your post, "There is no evidence of any orchestrated “replacement” of white people; instead, the data reflects ongoing societal changes."
 
  • Like
Reactions: yoshi121374

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,412
8,529
113
yea I know all about taxes, I pay a lot of them...

In your second paragraph, you missed my point. If there is an undocumented migrant on the country working then by definition he/she is breaking the law. All the other stuff - jobs Americans won't do, taking jobs from americans, what about the employers - is just talking points. If someone is breaking the law, they not only should not be remitting monies to another country, they should be deported. Now, for employers hiring undocumented workers..they should also be punished. And in my opinion hefty fines and jail time might send a message that this behavior will not be tolerated.

Why do we have laws if we're not going to enforce them?
The whole illegal immigrant tax/working stuff is completely ridiculous. They’ll say these people do jobs Americans won’t do and simultaneously claim they’re going to pay all the taxes??? It’s insanity! If those jobs were good enough to contribute tax dollars I doubt companies would need to hire illegals to do them. How is this not obvious. This is basic, elementary level understanding of economics.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,348
3,370
93
The whole illegal immigrant tax/working stuff is completely ridiculous. They’ll say these people do jobs Americans won’t do and simultaneously claim they’re going to pay all the taxes??? It’s insanity! If those jobs were good enough to contribute tax dollars I doubt companies would need to hire illegals to do them. How is this not obvious. This is basic, elementary level understanding of economics.
They absolutely do jobs Americans won't do. The answer is probably to increase sales tax somehow. That way everyone pays.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
23,620
21,998
113
Let me ask you a question, and just humor me, but if all the illegals were round up and kicked out of the country and the boarder was 100% secure and all the folks that were left were legal, US citizens and all the non-white US citizens started having children at a higher clip than the white ones, basically reducing the percentage of the population that was white, then would this also be a "Great Replacement Theory" as well?
Who settled America?

How can you be replaced if you were never established?

Did we replace the Native Americans? I would argue yes. Europeans kicked their ***, conquered them and settled America. Thats what I learned.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
23,620
21,998
113
The whole illegal immigrant tax/working stuff is completely ridiculous. They’ll say these people do jobs Americans won’t do and simultaneously claim they’re going to pay all the taxes??? It’s insanity! If those jobs were good enough to contribute tax dollars I doubt companies would need to hire illegals to do them. How is this not obvious. This is basic, elementary level understanding of economics.
Of course what they mean is that Americans won’t do those jobs AT THAT PRICE.

They are undercutting the price of American labor.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,944
32,897
113
? I didn't say that. My contention is the mainstreaming of the Great Replacement Theory, which is an alt-right white nationalist bogeyman championed by Neo Nazis across the world.
Just look at the facts of what's occurring. No other conclusion and crying racism is a tired and worn out lie related to this subject. I do not care about any bs insults from low IQ people.
 

fatpiggy

Heisman
Aug 18, 2002
23,620
21,998
113
Who settled America?

How can you be replaced if you were never established?

Did we replace the Native Americans? I would argue yes. Europeans kicked their ***, conquered them and settled America. Thats what I learned.
Re reading this, if it was natural fine. It wasn’t natural.


Biden left the border wide open. Democrats, especially on this board, continuously said there was nothing g they could do about it. That now a provable lie because Trump has done it.

Democrats did it to gain votes. That’s not natural.

If we didn’t allow illegals to mooch our social system would they come here naturally?

What is natural?

If you advertise the border is open, like democrats did, if you provide welfare for people who break the law to invade your country, I have a hard time agreeing that’s natural.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,944
32,897
113
  • Haha
Reactions: yoshi121374

m.knox

All-Conference
Aug 20, 2003
2,697
2,716
113
So, if there is no such thing as "replacement theory" (which I accept), one does have to wonder why the Biden Administration let in 14 MM illegal immigrants and stuffed them into over crowded big cities where life isn't exactly wonderful.

So why did they do it? Did they simply just do it because Trump was against it? Compassion? Empathy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: fatpiggy

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,944
32,897
113
The whole illegal immigrant tax/working stuff is completely ridiculous. They’ll say these people do jobs Americans won’t do and simultaneously claim they’re going to pay all the taxes??? It’s insanity! If those jobs were good enough to contribute tax dollars I doubt companies would need to hire illegals to do them. How is this not obvious. This is basic, elementary level understanding of economics.
 

tigres88

All-American
Aug 7, 2022
2,182
5,682
113
I just want to add that it's really sad that Replacement Theory is becoming normalized (and inside the Overton Window) within a year of Trump's Presidency. It's so obviously problematic and is considered racist because it reframes natural demographic changes (immigration, birth rates, mixed-race families) as an intentional act of malice or "genocide" against white people. Which is truly insane, when White people have places of power in almost EVERY position in 2026, from the government, to CEO's, to Tech bro's, etc. Yes, there are exceptions. But the stats are overwhelming.

White people are not threatened. They aren't being replaced. We've always been a place welcome to other races, nationalities, demographics, ways of thought, etc.

It's literally what the U.S. was built on, and always has been. Three right wing "replacement theorist" mass shooters as recently as the past 6 years cited "Replacement Theory" in their manifesto's. Miller, Vance, and Ramaswamy are all either direct adherents or have echo'd similar ideology.

Turning American's against immigrants, people of color, or even citizens of different races is so incredibly thin skinned and problematic when White people hold ALL the positions of power in the U.S. It turns literal neighbors into existential threats. When people believe they are being "replaced" or "erased," they feel justified in using violence (like the Payton Gendren shooter in 2022) or enacting cruel policies (like family separation) as "self-defense."

America is a sad sad place if this is getting normalized in 2026.
 
Last edited:

PAWrocka

Heisman
Nov 3, 2008
21,044
28,343
103
So, if there is no such thing as "replacement theory" (which I accept), one does have to wonder why the Biden Administration let in 14 MM illegal immigrants and stuffed them into over crowded big cities where life isn't exactly wonderful.

So why did they do it? Did they simply just do it because Trump was against it? Compassion? Empathy?
Because people are leaving blue states (California, NY, Illinois, Maryland etc) in droves and moving to red states.

I tend to believe that illegals aren’t voting or at least not voting in numbers to make a difference BUT what they are doing is being counted in the Census and the Census is what determines congressional districts and the number of reps in Congress. Sooooooooooo the blue states had to replace the people they lost to the population shift..

that is why …
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,412
8,529
113
They absolutely do jobs Americans won't do. The answer is probably to increase sales tax somehow. That way everyone pays.
Well yea, Americans in general don’t want to pick berries for 8$ an hour. But you can’t have it both ways. They can’t be here to do farm labor for minimum wage AND be here to make up for the deficit. It makes no sense. If you truly wanted to increase taxable income and earners, the policies would be geared towards bringing innovators, inventors and investors into the economy, not berry pickers. Those people contribute to the country in a measurable way, they are a net add. It’s not a great policy to encourage and incentivize basically slave labor and trafficking. This is probably the most glaring example of TDS if there ever was one. There’s literally 100’s of videos of every democrat in America over the past 30 years saying verbatim what I am. But the millisecond trump took that position it went straight to “bring em all”. I have never seen more rational people perform the kind of mental gymnastics they do when trying to defend illegal immigration.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,412
8,529
113
Of course what they mean is that Americans won’t do those jobs AT THAT PRICE.

They are undercutting the price of American labor.
Of course but that’s a secondary point. The left constantly tells you how much illegals contribute to taxes, my point is they don’t, as by their own admission those people are mainly doing menial labor and jobs. They’re not paying taxes like you and I, nor are they spending their money here in our economy. So not only does it hurt American workers by taking jobs, it also lowers wages. How can McDonald’s employees get 20$/hr when people are building houses for 12$/hr.
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,412
8,529
113
Call it whatever you want. Here’s the data. This is LEGAL immigrants. What do you think the illegals look like.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TigerGrowls

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,412
8,529
113
So, if there is no such thing as "replacement theory" (which I accept), one does have to wonder why the Biden Administration let in 14 MM illegal immigrants and stuffed them into over crowded big cities where life isn't exactly wonderful.

So why did they do it? Did they simply just do it because Trump was against it? Compassion? Empathy?
100% bc of Trump imo. Obama was deporting way more people and not a peep. There’s literally 100’s of videos of every democrat you can think of that’s been anyone saying precisely these type of things. No activist judges going rogue, no “activists” protesting. Just look at the variables and see which one changed, it’s Trump. They didn’t get more compassionate over one term, that’s ridiculous. This is the party of 20$/hr minimum wage and child labor in berry fields. Their ability to mentally compartmentalize things is incredible. Everything is in a silo or vacuum, literally everything for them is that way.
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,236
8,473
113
The term “replaced” often carries connotations of a deliberate or conspiratorial process, but based on demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau, what we’re seeing is a gradual shift in the racial composition of the U.S. population due to natural factors like differing birth rates, immigration patterns, aging populations, and changes in how people self-identify on censuses (e.g., more individuals identifying as multiracial). 0 There is no evidence of any orchestrated “replacement” of white people; instead, the data reflects ongoing societal changes.
OK, if what you're talking about when you use the term "Great Replacement Theory" is simply the fact of an ongoing demographic shift, then I agree with you. That is incontestable.

But the plain fact is that the term "Great Replacement Theory," at least as it is typically used by conservatives and white nationalists, is larded up with the implication that this demographic shift is a very bad thing, and that it should be vigorously opposed. Frankly, I don't know how you would oppose it and still have a functioning U.S. economy or society. Birthrates among white Americans have fallen, no? And we need a regular infusion of immigrant labor, both skilled and unskilled, to fill jobs in our economy.
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,236
8,473
113
See my responses in red type, below.

All the other stuff - jobs Americans won't do, taking jobs from americans, what about the employers - is just talking points. Mere talking points, eh? You'll have to pardon me if I disagree with you. So only the undocumented immigrants should be penalized? The people who hire them should be held blameless? And forget about simply not prosecuting them. That would not satisfy those employers. They want and need those undocumented workers, and will find a way to get them. Surely you understand this. If someone is breaking the law, they not only should not be remitting monies to another country, Wiring money to another country is not illegal. Calling it a "remittance" does not change that fact. They should be deported. I not only have to disagree with you here, Ned, but I have to laugh at you. Not with you. At you. Whether you want to believe it or not, undocumented workers are an essential part of the U.S. economy. It could not function without them. That's just a fact. Now, for employers hiring undocumented workers..they should also be punished. And in my opinion hefty fines and jail time might send a message that this behavior will not be tolerated. We both know that is NEVER gonna happen. These ranchers, growers, factory owners, construction firms, garment manufacturers, and restauranteurs are generally wealthy and politically connected.

Why do we have laws if we're not going to enforce them?
 

LafayetteBear

All-American
Nov 30, 2009
33,236
8,473
113
Of course what they mean is that Americans won’t do those jobs AT THAT PRICE.

They are undercutting the price of American labor.
And YOU benefit from that. If fruit and vegetables were picked by American citizens at the hourly rate and under the working conditions they required, you and millions of other American consumers would have a shiat fit at the increase in prices for your fruits and vegetables.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,944
32,897
113
And YOU benefit from that. If fruit and vegetables were picked by American citizens at the hourly rate and under the working conditions they required, you and millions of other American consumers would have a shiat fit at the increase in prices for your fruits and vegetables.
No one has an issue with seasonal workers and that's been in place for decades. Lame talking point.
 

TigerGrowls

Heisman
Dec 21, 2001
43,944
32,897
113


I just read the entire Migration and the 2030 Agenda: A Guide for Practitioners, and if you strip out all the humanitarian, climate-change and “progress for humanity” language, here’s what it boils down to.

They want a managed global population with no stubborn rooted majorities, no strong old-world identities, and no independent power centers, so they suppress Western fertility through pharmakia, food and water contamination, psychological warfare and propaganda, then present the resulting demographic collapse as a neutral problem and “solve” it with permanent mass migration that keeps the debt economy running, dilutes historic white/Christian populations, breaks social cohesion, and justifies a thick web of surveillance, speech control, NGO management and UN-style governance over human bodies, borders, labour and money until most people are interchangeable, trackable units in a post-national, post-Christian, post-ethnic grid.

They do not just bulldoze everyone because they still need a large, frightened, semi-healthy herd to work, consume, and validate their status, they do not have absolute unified power, open slaughter risks revolt and delegitimizes the system, and the kind of people who build this architecture think in terms of slow, deniable, legalistic pressure and manufactured consent, so poison comes as medicine, control comes as care, demographic replacement comes as compassion, and they keep tightening the cage while pretending nothing fundamental is happening.
👇👇👇
un.org/sites/un2.un.o…
 

MTTiger19

All-American
Sep 10, 2008
5,412
8,529
113
And YOU benefit from that. If fruit and vegetables were picked by American citizens at the hourly rate and under the working conditions they required, you and millions of other American consumers would have a shiat fit at the increase in prices for your fruits and vegetables.
Well by all means, let’s destroy our economy for cheap fruits and veggies!! I mean how much more can you charge for an apple? I would’ve never believed that the price of cherries would be the demise of the greatest nation on planet earth. And frankly we do end up paying - in the form of higher taxes, lower wages, higher crime and more people on taxpayer funded subsidies. Incredible this has do be explained.
 
Last edited:

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,348
3,370
93
Who settled America?

How can you be replaced if you were never established?

Did we replace the Native Americans? I would argue yes. Europeans kicked their ***, conquered them and settled America. Thats what I learned.
That didn’t answer the question.
 

Jfcarter3

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2004
2,348
3,370
93
Of course what they mean is that Americans won’t do those jobs AT THAT PRICE.

They are undercutting the price of American labor.
“Artificial price setting is a defining, central feature of socialist economies, where state planning agencies fix prices rather than allowing market forces of supply and demand to determine them.”

And you scream about the socialist “Libtards”.