Hillary skates
The evidence that they broke the law is there, but there was no intent.
I'm gonna try that excuse in the future.
She will be president. No way they let her lose.
Not surprised...and some on here will be okay with her getting off with just a finger pointing and stern look from the FBI.Hillary skates
[roll]:flush: James Comey, Republican....appointed as asst AG by W, John Ashcroft's right hand man....considered a straight shooter by anyone who pays attention, said "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue this. But just like all things Clinton, you guys can theorize on this for the next 2 decades....all through her Presidency. Hva efun!We knew this would be the result. She committed a felony.. but hey... no precedent so don't charge. [eyeroll]
[roll]:flush: James Comey, Republican....appointed as asst AG by W, John Ashcroft's right hand man....considered a straight shooter by anyone who pays attention, said "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue this. But just like all things Clinton, you guys can theorize on this for the next 2 decades....all through her Presidency. Hva efun!
Really? What felony has she been convicted of?Enjoy knowing you support and endorse a felon. [thumb2]
^^^^ also believes OJ is not a killer ^^^^Really? What felony has she been convicted of?
Really? What felony has she been convicted of?
^^^^ also believes OJ is not a killer ^^^^
[roll]:flush: James Comey, Republican....appointed as asst AG by W, John Ashcroft's right hand man....considered a straight shooter by anyone who pays attention, said "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue this. But just like all things Clinton, you guys can theorize on this for the next 2 decades....all through her Presidency. Hva efun!
Really? What felony has she been convicted of?
Wasting your time with this one. He doesn't care about right or wrong, he only cares about his side winning. Party before country.He's not a prosecutor. He made a decision that is not his to make.
Sounds pretty convicting to me...
"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).
None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail."
I didn't intend to run over the guy while I was drunk, but it happened. Oh it's ok, no reasonable prosecutor will indict over this, we'll let you by. Slick Willy and Slick Hilly.
Mishandling Classified Information
2009 Federal Records Act
Freedom of Information Act (And the was intent here)
Yet to come - what happens with the Clinton Foundation and the corruption charges?
Wasting your time with this one. He doesn't care about right or wrong, he only cares about his side winning. Party before country.
Wasting your time with this one. He doesn't care about right or wrong, he only cares about his side winning. Party before country.
Yet to come - what happens with the Clinton Foundation and the corruption charges?
[roll]In true Clintons-are-evil-and-deserve-to die fashion, this latest scandal has evolved from Benghazi to emails and no crimes were committed. Now, the wingnuts will move on to the Foundation. No vast right wing conspiracy here, is there?Yet to come - what happens with the Clinton Foundation and the corruption charges?
As I said just last week, she'll be indicted as soon as Colin Powell and Condi Rice are. They each did the same thing-just not as much. Of course some ignorantly think it's about the numbers-not the actions. Bottom line in all this is nobody who supports her will find anything she did to be so overwhelmingly bad that they will withhold support. Conversely, those who think she's satan's daughter will still think she's evil.I told everyone a year ago that she would not be charged. There never was a "right wing conspiracy" to get the Clintons. The FBI made the decision to investigate possible wrong doing. Its interesting that they did find proof that she is guilty of piss poor judgement.
The fact is,according to the FBI, that 110 emails in 52 email chains found on Clinton's server contained information that was classified at the time they were sent or received. I believe that is the claim that most of Hillarrys antagonists were claiming all along. Looks like they were correct.
You would be wrong....http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/04/polit...ail-classified-colin-powell-condoleezza-rice/Neither Powell nor Rice had their own unsecured servers, nor did they use unsecure non-governmental email exclusively for all communications. Totally different. And, to my knowledge, neither transmitted and received top secret email from their personal non-governmental accounts.
Powell and Rice set-up their own servers?As I said just last week, she'll be indicted as soon as Colin Powell and Condi Rice are. They each did the same thing-just not as much. Of course some ignorantly think it's about the numbers-not the actions. Bottom line in all this is nobody who supports her will find anything she did to be so overwhelmingly bad that they will withhold support. Conversely, those who think she's satan's daughter will still think she's evil.
As I said just last week, she'll be indicted as soon as Colin Powell and Condi Rice are. They each did the same thing-just not as much. Of course some ignorantly think it's about the numbers-not the actions. Bottom line in all this is nobody who supports her will find anything she did to be so overwhelmingly bad that they will withhold support. Conversely, those who think she's satan's daughter will still think she's evil.
Fine, indict them as well if the evidence is present enough to do so. It certainly was in this case.As I said just last week, she'll be indicted as soon as Colin Powell and Condi Rice are. They each did the same thing-just not as much. Of course some ignorantly think it's about the numbers-not the actions. Bottom line in all this is nobody who supports her will find anything she did to be so overwhelmingly bad that they will withhold support. Conversely, those who think she's satan's daughter will still think she's evil.
There was never any evidence that Powell or Rice received or sent any classified or top secret information. As Comey said; Clinton received and sent classified and top secret information. Eight email chains contained "top secret" information. 36 chains contained "secret" information. Eight email chains contained "confidential" information, the lowest classification level. "None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system," Comey said. Those that support Hillary like yourself will continue to do so.As I said just last week, she'll be indicted as soon as Colin Powell and Condi Rice are. They each did the same thing-just not as much. Of course some ignorantly think it's about the numbers-not the actions. Bottom line in all this is nobody who supports her will find anything she did to be so overwhelmingly bad that they will withhold support. Conversely, those who think she's satan's daughter will still think she's evil.
since you say this is a partisan issue, do you think she compromised national security to the point that since she has a D by her name it's no big deal to you?As I said just last week, she'll be indicted as soon as Colin Powell and Condi Rice are. They each did the same thing-just not as much. Of course some ignorantly think it's about the numbers-not the actions. Bottom line in all this is nobody who supports her will find anything she did to be so overwhelmingly bad that they will withhold support. Conversely, those who think she's satan's daughter will still think she's evil.
Big difference.......as Comey detailed in the Clinton report: From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent. This was NOT the case with the Powell or Rice e-mails. Are you trying to tell us that Clinton is so stupid that she did not know she was receiving classified and top secret information?
"They"???? You mean the American voters? Or are you implying that there is a huge government conspiracy to throw the presidential election of 2016????? You sound like the Al Gore supporters in 2000.