Nobody won.
Justice won!!Nobody won.
Honestly, this was a scenario where the Constitution was going to fail someone. Both sides had ironclad arguments.Justice won!!
I bet Colorado drops it and we move on to another battlefront in the great Cake War.
Honestly, this was a scenario where the Constitution was going to fail someone. Both sides had ironclad arguments.
It's been a few years since I have studied Constitutional law, but did they gays really have that ironclad of an argument? Actually, I admit I know nothing and would rather just side with private business.Honestly, this was a scenario where the Constitution was going to fail someone. Both sides had ironclad arguments.
I don't understand why somebody would turn down business unless you are too busy to make the cake. I could say something filthy like I'd make a cake with a dick up somebody's *** if I'd get premium money for it![roll][roll][roll]
I don't understand why somebody would turn down business
You guys don't know me at all. Just like I don't know any of you. I do not hate any group of people. I am something of a dick at times, though.[cheers]Because you really have a strong hatred for a particular group of people and like being a dick.
You guys don't know me at all. Just like I don't know any of you. I do not hate any group of people. I am something of a dick at times, though.[cheers]
I guess all the liberals hate people who think there should be no free lunch. Who think there should be a work ethic and not free phones for your vote. Or welfare for your vote.
You guys don't know me at all. Just like I don't know any of you. I do not hate any group of people. I am something of a dick at times, though.[cheers]
You do realize that Coop took the conservative stance on this, correct? He said he favored the rights of private business.I guess all the liberals hate people who think there should be no free lunch. Who think there should be a work ethic and not free phones for your vote. Or welfare for your vote.
That wasn't what I was responding to.You do realize that Coop took the conservative stance on this, correct? He said he favored the rights of private business.
I just don't understand it. Even when all the crap was going on about HIV and guys didn't want to see HIV positive people, I never thought twice about it. He could have put a premium price on it and the people might have gone elsewhere. Problem solved.I wasn't saying YOU, personally. You asked a hypothetical question as to why SOMEONE would deny making a profit. I responded to your hypothetical question as to why SOMEONE would.....THAT PERSON hates a group of people more than making a buck.
Should have never went to court to begin with. Very simple solution. Take your business elsewhere. There are plenty of other non-bigoted bakeries that would have been very happy to take their money. Courts should have never been involved. The gay couple just wanted attention.
Wow....the baker didn't go looking for the gay couple , the baker didn't go to the courts or the news paper ...it wasn't like what whites did to blacks back in the day , they would bake them all the cup cakes they wanted, just wouldn't bake a wedding cake ...Or you know...the baker could have baked a fcking cake. The baker just wanted attention.
Discrimination in pricing will get you *** into more legal trouble than you can get out of overnight. Need another tactic.I just don't understand it. Even when all the crap was going on about HIV and guys didn't want to see HIV positive people, I never thought twice about it. He could have put a premium price on it and the people might have gone elsewhere. Problem solved.
Damn, we agree again. Could I possibly be wrong? Also in agreement re. ConLaw. A Hell of a long time.It's been a few years since I have studied Constitutional law, but did they gays really have that ironclad of an argument? Actually, I admit I know nothing and would rather just side with private business.
Wow....the baker didn't go looking for the gay couple , the baker didn't go to the courts or the news paper ...it wasn't like what whites did to blacks back in the day , they would bake them all the cup cakes they wanted, just wouldn't bake a wedding cake ...
To your first question, it’s a cake baker. Not exactly of the warrior culture.What kind of triggered snowflake you got to be to not bake a cake?
“You just can’t use this water fountain that says whites only! Hey there’s a perfectly good one right there that says coloreds.”
FOH with that ********.
Myself I would have baked it made the money ....its nothing like what blacks went thru, at all , they never refused to serve them,except the wedding cake .why try & make someone do something against there beliefWhat kind of triggered snowflake you got to be to not bake a cake?
“You just can’t use this water fountain that says whites only! Hey there’s a perfectly good one right there that says coloreds.”
FOH with that ********.
Since was a specialty cake, why not special pricing.Discrimination in pricing will get you *** into more legal trouble than you can get out of overnight. Need another tactic.
That makes a little sense to me, but the government is who you have to convince. The one time I had an argument on principle, the government lawyers were smart assed and asked me if I could afford legal expense to argue with tax paid lawyers. My answer was hell no. I cannot answer for you and your ability to feed lawyers.Since was a specialty cake, why not special pricing.
What could they do to the bakers if they just made it ugly & taste like sh$t.Since was a specialty cake, why not special pricing.
To your first question, it’s a cake baker. Not exactly of the warrior culture.
Your example, you’re fine trampling this person’s religious liberty? The baker is as entitled to that protection as the gay couple is from discrimination. I’m guessing that because they could go to another baker one has to side with the person who would be most aggrieved, which would be the baker in this case.
Personally, this was one where it was impossible to rule without violating something. Andddd shocker, another split court.
We still using religious liberty as an excuse in 2018? lol Sorry...that ark sailed away once things got Stormy.
But you told us not to judge others! Which is it?
Last time I checked the bakers wasn't banging the porn star ....& religious liberty could be any form of religion. .& Donald wasn't a setting president when he was banging her ...just some rich dude who banged alot of girls ...We still using religious liberty as an excuse in 2018? lol Sorry...that ark sailed away once things got Stormy.
I told you what?
But sure...let’s play this game.
Compare/contrast a gay couple getting married and wanting a cake made and trump’s stance on this hallowed institution.
And now which one has your vote.
Last time I checked the bakers wasn't banging the porn star ....& religious liberty could be any form of religion. .& Donald wasn't a setting president when he was banging her ...just some rich dude who banged alot of girls ...
I can't compare, they aren't equivalent. The gay couple can get married and get a cake from wherever else they want. I'm not baking them one either. That doesn't mean I judge them.
Bill got his rocks off in the Oval Office. Hallowed institution?
A gay couple getting married is the crime! [laughing]I told you what?
But sure...let’s play this game.
Compare/contrast a gay couple getting married and wanting a cake made and trump’s stance on this hallowed institution.
And now which one has your vote.
What is the comparison? Never heard anyone accusing Trump of sucking. With his money, I would have had lovely ladies standing in line to get to *** me, but suck a joint is outside sex for most men -me.Talking about marriage.
And you wouldn’t bake them a cake (assuming you were a baker with a business) but you will vote for trump.
Gotcha. We see how deep those convictions run.