Here is the official B1G statement, which IMO raises more questions than it answers.
"Following video review, it was determined Western Michigan’s #18 started his jump from an established out-of-bounds position (left foot) and made contact with the ball with one second remaining on the clock. As shown in the provided video of what was viewed during the replay process, a side-by-side view of the play and the game clock, using a direct shot of the game clock in the stadium, was used to determine the final ruling." (Emphasis added.)
So, they used the game clock. That nullifies McAuley's "two clock" theory, which is the only theory that makes sense.
Because if they are claiming that the game clock still had a second left on it when the ball was touched, they are asking us to ignore the evidence of our own eyes:
View attachment 1424120