Team MVP

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,150
10,668
82
To me the answer is simple, and it’s Cliff in a landslide. He is also most improved. Everyone on the team had off nights. He has not had one in 2022.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BossNJ

FrankZ_RU93

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
25,561
11,232
113
Yeah, it's Cliff. Just means so much in the paint. If he sat out even another minute last night, we lose.
 

RUJMM78

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
26,212
12,474
113
To me the answer is simple, and it’s Cliff in a landslide. He is also most improved. Everyone on the team had off nights. He has not had one in 2022.
You can't be serious.Cliff has shown tremendous improvement since last season but he isn't the MVP.Harper is the MVP because he is the leading scorer while playing with multiple injuries.The two winning baskets against Purdue and Indiana are shots that few college players could make.He wants the ball at crunch time similar to Baker two years ago.
 

RUsojo

Heisman
Dec 17, 2010
29,434
28,577
113
Yeah I think it’s superrrrr tight between cliff and Ron as well. I mentioned this a few times in December that cliff is probably the best player on the team. I can see an argument for both and think that’s fine. They’re clearly separated from everyone else. Ron always was separated from the pack. Took cliff 10+ games or so.
 

YoucancallmeRay

All-Conference
Nov 3, 2015
1,790
1,905
113
Season's not over, but to this point you could make an argument for Paul (we wouldn't have gone on the run without him playing so well), Geo (made big shots in many games where we needed a lift), Ron ( many big shots), Caleb ( energizer bunny and a defensive mainstay for a team that prides itself on D), and Cliff (for defense and some energizing dunks). So, to me, the whole team is the MVP since no single player is more valuable than the others above.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jeffro5

Randal7

All-American
Jul 22, 2009
6,710
6,120
77
Harper is the MVP. We would’ve won half the games we won without him. Cliff is absolutely critical too but I think we still beat a couple of those squads without him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,375
4,659
66
So is everyone here ready to admit being wrong about Myles ? Told you so. He was a terrible, unathletic and uncoordinated offensive player and only a decent rebounder because of his position in the paint.

I am sure Im no longer the only one glad he’s gone.

Now we have a legit big man who would not have developed nearly as much while watching Myles continue to set basketball offense back 50 years.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DHajekRC84

PiscatawayMike

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
17,345
15,214
113
So is everyone here ready to admit being wrong about Myles ? Told you so. He was a terrible, unathletic and uncoordinated offensive player and only a decent rebounder because of his position in the paint.

I am sure Im no longer the only one glad he’s gone.

Now we have a legit big man who would not have developed nearly as much while watching Myles continue to set basketball offense back 50 years.
I agree that his offense (including free-throw shooting) left a lot to be desired, but Myles was an excellent fit for last year's team. He was arguably the best defensive player in the B1G. We would not have sniffed the big dance last season without him on the court.
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
If you are going by the literal sense of the most valuable player it almost isnt debateable that the answer is Cliff.
Agreed. If you take away Cliff we are probably pretty bad. Reiber and Agee would not be able to fill that void

Cliff has been the most consistent player bringing it every night

MVP will probably be given to Ron bc of the big shots and scoring but they are pretty much co MVPs
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
So is everyone here ready to admit being wrong about Myles ? Told you so. He was a terrible, unathletic and uncoordinated offensive player and only a decent rebounder because of his position in the paint.

I am sure Im no longer the only one glad he’s gone.

Now we have a legit big man who would not have developed nearly as much while watching Myles continue to set basketball offense back 50 years.
I liked Cliff over Myles bc of athleticism upside and offense but would love to have had Myles as a backup. Imagine if we could bring him in against Edey and Kofi
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
I liked Cliff over Myles bc of athleticism upside and offense but would love to have had Myles as a backup. Imagine if we could bring him in against Edey and Kofi
Crazy thing is Myles is a much better defender against IU,PUR and ILL.....however we were still 3-2 in those games AND we might not have had a 3-2 record if those 3 teams realized Myles could neutralize their big guys and they wouldn't have had a game plan force feeding it inside and getting perimeter players out of rhtymn
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
Crazy thing is Myles is a much better defender against IU,PUR and ILL.....however we were still 3-2 in those games AND we might not have had a 3-2 record if those 3 teams realized Myles could neutralize their big guys and they wouldn't have had a game plan force feeding it inside and getting perimeter players out of rhtymn
Yea I'm still surprised we did so well against Purdue and Illinois bc of our lack of size and depth at 5 defensively. Myles really did shut down TJD too
 

Greene Rice FIG

Heisman
Dec 30, 2005
40,437
23,613
0
Yea I'm still surprised we did so well against Purdue and Illinois bc of our lack of size and depth at 5 defensively. Myles really did shut down TJD too
All those teams game plans were to go to the low post every possession.

Kofi tired at the 14 minute mark and in our 3 wins I think the perimeter players suffered by not seeing the ball early (at least my analysis).

Kofi folded big time at the RAC. Once the power meter hit red he was toast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

S_Janowski

Heisman
May 24, 2009
13,915
26,524
113
So is everyone here ready to admit being wrong about Myles ? Told you so. He was a terrible, unathletic and uncoordinated offensive player and only a decent rebounder because of his position in the paint.

I am sure Im no longer the only one glad he’s gone.

Now we have a legit big man who would not have developed nearly as much while watching Myles continue to set basketball offense back 50 years.

The amount of people who should be admitting they were wrong or off base about most of these kids and Pikiell is staggering, but we rarely see it haha.

The combination of football fans getting sucked into basketball or people trying wayyyy too hard with their hot takes has made for so many terrible takes, or a lack of overall patience.

So many people were crucifying Cliff earlier in the year it would be embarrassing if we went back and read (stone hands, doesn’t know how to play basketball, play defense etc).

With that said I think your take on Myles is a little extreme. He wasn’t terrible or uncoordinated. He was a huge piece to our team but definitely had his weaknesses and seemed to have plateaued. To me, he didn’t seem to want it and was a bit soft. That could have been due to a number of factors (emphasis on academics, far from home, COVID).

But can we just try and be a little more positive across the board? I appreciate what Myles gave us, especially 3,000 miles away. He was a good kid and teammate. We’re fortunate as a program that he moved on which gave Cliff a massive opportunity to step in and flourish before our eyes.
 

Shelby65

All-Conference
Apr 1, 2008
8,375
4,659
66
I liked Cliff over Myles bc of athleticism upside and offense but would love to have had Myles as a backup. Imagine if we could bring him in against Edey and Kofi
1. he wouldn’t have been the backup .
2. being unathletic, he’d be dominated by those two players and also Dickinson. Plus, other bigs rested on defense against Myles. Cliff makes them play both ends which affects their offense.
3. Mike ... ‘a lot to be desired’ is the understatement of the year. ‘Terrible’ is more like it.
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,635
10,767
78
Cliff is most improved, followed by Paul.

Ron is undoubtably the MVP
It’s got to be Ron. Leading scorer, won multiple games with clutch shooting and was the focus of every team.

This team did spread out the roles really well. You could argue it’s Caleb or Cliff too. There was a stretch where Paul was the most important player. Geo is undervalued too here. He played a ton of minutes and did everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GORU2014

Skull83

All-Conference
Jul 31, 2001
2,464
3,372
98
The greatest thing about Cliff is that, as far as he has come, he still has plenty of room to improve! I'm really looking forward to his continued growth.
 

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,150
10,668
82
It’s got to be Ron. Leading scorer, won multiple games with clutch shooting and was the focus of every team.

This team did spread out the roles really well. You could argue it’s Caleb or Cliff too. There was a stretch where Paul was the most important player. Geo is undervalued too here. He played a ton of minutes and did everything.
Not putting down RHJ in the least, but imo it’s not even close. Ron had some stinky games where he was a non factor. Cliff brought it every night. Last night they were co MVP’s
 

Scangg

Heisman
Mar 19, 2016
25,448
49,369
113
1. he wouldn’t have been the backup .
2. being unathletic, he’d be dominated by those two players and also Dickinson. Plus, other bigs rested on defense against Myles. Cliff makes them play both ends which affects their offense.
3. Mike ... ‘a lot to be desired’ is the understatement of the year. ‘Terrible’ is more like it.
1. Cliff started over Myles before anyway. He would definitely start over Myles now

2. This is a laughably bad take, not to be taken seriously

3. Who is Mike? And who are you quoting?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rokodesh

RUby RED

All-Conference
Aug 9, 2010
1,857
2,683
0
Cliff and Ron 1A and 1B. Without Ron, Cliff’s leap and at-times dominant post-play wouldn’t matter, as this team wouldn’t score nearly enough to stay competitive in most tough games. Without Cliff though, this team would get dog-walked by the Big Ten’s seemingly endless line of solid bigs, in turn limiting the impact of Ron’s 3-level scoring and clutch play
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,150
10,668
82
I agree that his offense (including free-throw shooting) left a lot to be desired, but Myles was an excellent fit for last year's team. He was arguably the best defensive player in the B1G. We would not have sniffed the big dance last season without him on the court.
I have mixed emotions on Myles. He was so good defensively, but he was in perpetual foul trouble, and his offense and especially free throw shooting was putrid. I actually think that all three transfers were addition through subtraction as each loss allowed Paul and Cliff to flourish and I don’t think that happens with them there
 
  • Like
Reactions: rubigtimenow

mugrat86

Heisman
Dec 11, 2014
8,150
10,668
82
You can't be serious.Cliff has shown tremendous improvement since last season but he isn't the MVP.Harper is the MVP because he is the leading scorer while playing with multiple injuries.The two winning baskets against Purdue and Indiana are shots that few college players could make.He wants the ball at crunch time similar to Baker two years ago.
MVP is the player you could least likely afford to lose
 
Feb 5, 2003
10,971
9,374
113
2. being unathletic, he’d be dominated by those two players and also Dickinson. Plus, other bigs rested on defense against Myles. Cliff makes them play both ends which affects their offense.
We don't have to speculate on how Myles would fare against Kofi, Edey/Trevion, or Dickinson. We can look at last year's box scores. Bottom line, I think Myles can slow down Kofi and Edey but would struggle more with Williams and Dickinson this year. I don't think Edey is exceptionally athletic, but he has a VERY LARGE athlete.

If Myles had stayed and accepted backup 5 minutes, it would also allow Cliff to be more aggressive on time on D because foul trouble for him would not eviscerate the interior defense.

Rutgers 91, Illinois 88. Kofi went for 17 pts, 12 boards, one foul. No other stats. Myles had 9 pts, 13 boards, 3 blocks, 3 steals. That's basically a wash IMO.

Rutgers 81, Purdue 76: Williams had a great game w 21 pts, 12 boards, one block. Myles had 5 pts, 8 boards. Montez was the star, going 5 for 5 from downtown. Edey was a non-factor last year with 3 pts, 3 boards.

Michigan 71, Rutgers 64: Dickinson had 10 pts, 8 boards, 1 block. Myles had 13 pts, only 3 boards, and 4 blocks. It was Franz Wagner that killed us the most.
 

rutger80

All-Conference
Oct 14, 2013
2,477
1,762
0
Harper is the MVP, IMHO, but we wouldn't be where we are without Cliff's and Paul's development.
If Cliff continues to develop that little jumper....like Bailey had...watch out. He's got to work on his defense a lot more to be at Hinson level defense, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: motorb54

PSAL_Hoops

Heisman
Feb 18, 2008
13,310
12,632
78
If Myles returned this year we almost certainly would’ve seen our name not on bubble brackets but on the bracket reveal of the top 16 teams. The 2 of them would both be able to play hard straight up defense with 5 fouls to give. Cliff would be a monster on defense the whole game too. No PT issues.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scangg and RUsojo

rob kight

All-American
Oct 22, 2020
4,918
6,249
113
Actually it’s nice to able to debate who is the best. It means we have good arguments for 5 players. Better than having 1 superstar and 4 mediocre players
 

needmorecowbell

Heisman
Oct 28, 2007
9,635
10,767
78
Not putting down RHJ in the least, but imo it’s not even close. Ron had some stinky games where he was a non factor. Cliff brought it every night. Last night they were co MVP’s
Cliff had many nights where he shot the ball 3-6 times. And most of those attempts were wide open dunks. Your MVP does not have games where he’s not involved. He just wasn’t a major part of the offense because he’s game needed to develop. I’m not belittling his impact but there were too many nights like that. Next year I expect him get the ball a lot more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chrebet80