So let's review.
We have what is almost categorically recognized by opposing coaches, players and the media as one of the least hospitable arenas for opposing teams in the country, a crowd that is among the loudest in the country, a fan base that is finally being rewarded for decades of embarrassing, boring, inept and angering play, and the refrain is that displacing the most supportive and also very loud (contrary to the idiotic assertions of those who say otherwise) fans to other parts of the arena is necessary.
Let's consider what is generating these neolithic assertions. There was a line of students for tickets, which is a good problem to have. The students could have gotten season tickets prior to the season beginning, but didn't--normal student behavior (normal ticket-buying behavior, as is evident by Springsteen fans who camp out for tix only to not get them). Rutgers doesn't have a system in place for the students to know in advance if they will get tickets, so let the department figure out a relatively simple computerized solution to that issue. These students weren't lining up for the earlier games this season, which isn't a knock on them, it's a statement about normal fan behavior--when a team is good, the ticket is a hot item. Season-ticket holders are risk takers, and are rewarded for taking that risk when the team is good and penalized when the team is bad.
Somehow, magically, the RAC will become louder and a better place with a few hundred students in the front rows, at a price tag of about $2mm/per year, which is what the revenues from the current ticket holders and donors in those spaces generate. Take exception if you want to football using 300 seats as a recruiting tool, but the notion that moving the money people out given our AD's financial woes, all because of a picture of students who didn't get their tickets in advance, and possibly because they weren't going to the games if we weren't good this year, is standard keyboard lunacy.
We are a developing program with the bumps and bruises that go along with success, but these broadsweeping, grandiose and misguided ideas of making drastic changes due to a picture of students on line is jackassery in all its simplistic lunacy.