Hope you took a poop break moetard. Diapers are expensive.on a statement from the Republicans regarding the gang of eight meeting @/DOJ today w/FBI regarding Trump's "spy". Dems made a statement about a nothingburger. I guess the Repubs will say something after they have dinner or maybe tomorrow or lol. smh
on a statement from the Republicans regarding the gang of eight meeting @/DOJ today w/FBI regarding Trump's "spy". Dems made a statement about a nothingburger. I guess the Repubs will say something after they have dinner or maybe tomorrow or lol. smh
There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.LOL
Of course the criminals turn themselves in. Did you expect anything different? I didn’t. I don’t expect the unredacted documents tomorrow either.
Do you just repeat every word they tell you to say moe?There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.
There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.
There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.
This was nothing more than a ‘hey look over there’ maneuver from the beginning.There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.
This was nothing more than a ‘heylook over there’ maneuver from the beginning.
Who could have possibly seen this coming?
don't carebirth certificate
There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”wire tappings
Linkimproper unmasking
Undetermined, they won't show the FISA warrants yet.Carter Page FISA was unwarranted
Ongoinguranium one
LinkMark Warner
You being wrong again? Everyone
don't care
There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”
Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal. Nunes made the same point in March.
Link
Undetermined, they won't show the FISA warrants yet.
Ongoing
Link
Just because they're "duds" in your eyes, doesn't mean that the incidents did not happen and potentially won't be dealt with in the future.