Still waiting

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,850
280
83
on a statement from the Republicans regarding the gang of eight meeting @/DOJ today w/FBI regarding Trump's "spy". Dems made a statement about a nothingburger. I guess the Repubs will say something after they have dinner or maybe tomorrow or lol. smh
 

EEResistable

All-American
May 29, 2001
89,586
6,085
61

I’m surprised she is able to respond at all. She needs forcibly retired. She’s going senile.
 

dave

Senior
May 29, 2001
60,598
814
113
on a statement from the Republicans regarding the gang of eight meeting @/DOJ today w/FBI regarding Trump's "spy". Dems made a statement about a nothingburger. I guess the Repubs will say something after they have dinner or maybe tomorrow or lol. smh
Hope you took a poop break moetard. Diapers are expensive.
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
on a statement from the Republicans regarding the gang of eight meeting @/DOJ today w/FBI regarding Trump's "spy". Dems made a statement about a nothingburger. I guess the Repubs will say something after they have dinner or maybe tomorrow or lol. smh

LOL

Of course the criminals turn themselves in. Did you expect anything different? I didn’t. I don’t expect the unredacted documents tomorrow either.
 

DvlDog4WVU

All-Conference
Feb 2, 2008
47,209
3,292
113
Grassley and Gowdey will be subpoenaing 3 FBI agents who have been begging for it. I suspect you’ll get plenty of information from their brief. I also suspect there will be some perjury charges not long after.
 

moe

Junior
May 29, 2001
32,850
280
83
LOL

Of course the criminals turn themselves in. Did you expect anything different? I didn’t. I don’t expect the unredacted documents tomorrow either.
There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,382
5,948
113
There is no spy, duh just more Trump lies. It never ends.

moe you remind me of someone who's been inside all their Life and never seen the Sun. Take you outside and point to it..."see that big bright round thing up there you can barely look at? That's the Sun!"

moe says "Uh...I don't see no Sun...all I see is bright light".

Carry on moe.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
Another dud.

Who could have possibly seen this coming?

Everyone. Everyone could have seen this coming.

Throw it on the pile of trump conspiracy theories that get the tin foil hat brigade all hot and bothered but ends in blue balls for them.

Birth certificates, wire tappings, improper unmasking, Carter Page FISA was unwarranted, uranium one, Mark Warner...

The list goes on. It’s seriously time to question the intelligence of those who continue to allow themselves to buy into this ********.
 

Mntneer

Sophomore
Oct 7, 2001
10,192
196
0
When you see a subject of "Still Waiting" these days... one can only assume it ends with "Still waiting on that proof of collusion with the Russians."\
 

TarHeelEer

Freshman
Dec 15, 2002
89,304
53
48
Who could have possibly seen this coming?

You being wrong again? Everyone

birth certificate
don't care

wire tappings
There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”

Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal. Nunes made the same point in March.

improper unmasking
Link


Carter Page FISA was unwarranted
Undetermined, they won't show the FISA warrants yet.

uranium one
Ongoing

Mark Warner
Link

Just because they're "duds" in your eyes, doesn't mean that the incidents did not happen and potentially won't be dealt with in the future.
 

CpEER

Senior
May 29, 2001
45,701
759
0
You being wrong again? Everyone


don't care


There is no evidence that any of Trump’s conversations were picked up by the FBI, but if they were that would have been “incidental collection” of information. Nunes said in March that he reviewed “intelligence reports” that show “incidental collection” on some unnamed Trump transition team members. Nunes said he did not know if any of Trump’s conversations were picked up during surveillance. The CNN story also said, “It’s unclear whether Trump himself was picked up on the surveillance.”

Incidental collection of information is legal with a FISA court order. Trump claimed that Obama was responsible for illegal Watergate-style wiretapping, but CNN wrote that the FISA court authorized the wiretapping of Manafort. That would make the incidental collection of information on Trump, or anyone else, perfectly legal. Nunes made the same point in March.


Link



Undetermined, they won't show the FISA warrants yet.


Ongoing


Link

Just because they're "duds" in your eyes, doesn't mean that the incidents did not happen and potentially won't be dealt with in the future.


So soonish?
 

atlkvb

All-American
Jul 9, 2004
82,382
5,948
113

See it works like this:

If you're helping to prevent an Orange colored carnival barking ***** grabbing misogynist from becoming President, you're not spying you're providing confidential human resource in formation. (Obama) If you've bugged the Democrat campaign headquarters to listen in on campaign strategy of those who are trying to liberate us from White Christian dominated oppressive Capitalism...then you're "spying".(Nixon)