Yeah, I have to agree with all that, very frustrating playing Palmer and Langford of IU as their game is predicated on getting into traffic, initiating contact, going to the line. Saw it against Minnesota too, remember that one where he jumped into a defender to get to the line for the game winning FTs? He did very well in live ball situations tonight though.He is definitely smooth. "Couldn't defend the free throw line." Well played by coach without overtly calling out all the calls afforded Palmer nor blaming the loss on it.
...With that said, RU deserved to lose, live ball turnovers were the culprit, so I agree with him there too. Even when RU was up 5 for much of the 2nd half they weren't playing well.
Yeah, I have to agree with all that, very frustrating playing Palmer and Langford of IU as their game is predicated on getting into traffic, initiating contact, going to the line. Saw it against Minnesota too, remember that one where he jumped into a defender to get to the line for the game winning FTs? He did very well in live ball situations tonight though.
On yet the other hand, fouls were 26-13... were we playing that more physical than they were... nope. Tough when you have to finish your drives through contact with no calls and the opponent gets to go to the line after they seek you out on drives. Messes with your head on offense. Refs knew Nebraska basically had 3 guys and once 2 of them got in a little bit of foul trouble, they put the whistles away; either consciously or subconsciously, they knew that putting any of their 3 on the bench would effectively end the game.
On3
Greg McElroy breaks down Big Ten into contending tiers ahead of 2026 season
On3
Ranking every Big Ten head coach's all-time record against AP Top 25 opponents
On3
ESPN names biggest archenemies for every Big Ten school
The Knight Report
Six Years Later, Rutgers Football has quietly transformed the Offensive Line room
The Knight Report
WAR ROOM: Latest Recruit Scoop and Team News on Rutgers Athletics