That's correct, but forget about Bama. A&M is giving up a HR every 47 innings, that's about 3.5X less than we are.
I think the main point to take away from these numbers is that for some reason it's alot harder for MSU to hit HRs out of DNF than San Diego, Western Kentucky, Alabama, etc...
DNF has never been considered a hitter park though. Blue Bell has been a better hitters park in its short lifespan, despite having similar dimensions but being 10 feet longer in center
TAMU HR's since Blue Bell opened
2014 so far - 21
2013 - 26
2012 - 23
i dont think its any coincidence that TAMU is 21-0 this year with the team they're fielding right now.
For comparison
Stat.......TAMU.......MSU
gp..........21.........22
avg........309..........293
runs.......157.......148
hr.........21.........7
slg........471........383
The interesting thing in there is that we are playing two completely different styles of ball and the avg and run production isnt all that far off. This is the type of thing that shows that small ball can work.
The difference in wins is what you see below.
Stat.......TAMU.......MSU
IP..........191........199
ERA........1.65.......3.30
K's.........193........192
oppavg....221.......232
bb+hbp....56.........100
so what you see is the hitting isnt the issue (yes it could be better). We are getting buy at a similar k rate and pretty damn close opponent batting averages to be honest. The difference comes in the walks+hit by pitch category, which in turn throws the ERA waaaaay out of whack.
its till pitching more than hitting....