Skj transferrin

Fawrules

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2009
3,456
2,971
113
Sucks that he left though but I can see why he would leave . Then again I don’t know why some guys commit here when they are for sure One and Done type talent . They know every year we are in it for top talent so if you don’t want to compete with those guys why commit in the first place ?

I understand, but then people will complain that we're not signing any multi-year players. The problem being that when we do sign players we expect to fill those roles, they end up exceeding expectations and being Lottery Picks after one season like Booker and Shai, or transferring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaudylo

JC43

All-Conference
Oct 6, 2006
3,807
2,956
0
This take is absolute lunacy. SKJ is in no way whatsoever a 3. He has never played the 3. He never will play the 3.

I really wonder what some of you guys are watching.
In highschool, check old ratings....not now saying his skill set was never posting up. Always played facing the basket.
Exactly like Tay daddy in HS
 

GCASE

Freshman
Oct 15, 2014
137
69
0
I hate to hear this and personally like it when Sacha was on the court for the most part. I def. agree with those who said he got in Cal's doghouse somewhere early in his freshman year and never recovered. Wish him the best and success.

Hate this also for the overall impact this has on the current landscape of college Bball. Coaches are not as committed to kids and kids are not as committed to coaches. Too many ways out for unhappy players AND coaches. To many don't work through the problems. I know tons of pressure to win on coaches - tons of pressure being a UK player that takes a minute to develop. Idk - I just hoped he would stay.

I don't think Cal has anything to do with this. The players that come here know Cal is going to continue to recruit the best of the best, They almost all state when they sign with Kentucky that they are looking to forward to practicing against the best players in the country.

While I hate to see Sacha go & like a lot of others on here I think he should of been starting over Richards, Him transferring is his choice I guess he didn't want to compete for playing time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JC43 and struggler

Dr. H Lecter

Heisman
Apr 5, 2007
15,267
30,183
66
Anyone who was watching him these past two years could tell that he didnt seem to fit for some reason. I have my personal view as to what happened with him last season where he was just shut off. But even this year where he did seem to be able to help us....he would seem to have been excused for looking at Nick Richards in the starting lineup and asking...WTF.

In the end it is probably the best for him. Maybe he will become another "Matthews." I hope he does and wish him well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TankedCat

Fawrules

All-Conference
Nov 19, 2009
3,456
2,971
113
Richards has a lot of potential. But, pinning our hopes entirely on Richards should be of concern. PJ and Vanderbilt returning remain crucial and I still hope we can get a big man Grad transfer. Again, I understand the excitement we all share when landing top high school talent, but experience and leadership is so important.

Oh, trust me, I feel the same way you do. With EJ I feel that we need to keep at least one of Washington/Vanderbilt & Gabriel if we wanna be serious contenders. Maybe more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ManitouDan
Jan 9, 2007
15,353
13,412
0
*sigh*

I know SKJ wasn't the greatest player but I was excited to see how he would progress. It's not about losing one player it's just that this is the culture of the program now. If you're a 4 star recruit who takes some time to develop, don't go to Kentucky because 1) you'll be a failure if you aren't a one and done 2) you won't see the court because you'll get recruited over if you don't produce immediately.

Just disappointing and not a culture that's conducive to building a championship roster IMO
 

Mike-D

Heisman
Jul 14, 2001
50,000
74,054
113
[laughing]

Like Cal can stop a dude from transferring. That would look good for future recruiting. Headlines like “Calipari won’t grant release for SKJ. Forced to return.” Rival recruiters would be slobbering all over themselves, and Jeff Goodman would have that 3 gerbils look.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankUnderwood

CalipariCapo

All-Conference
Feb 25, 2018
1,609
2,824
0
All these kids have to realize that there is nothing wrong with staying at a school for 4 years and developing...sometimes you are not very good
This is the exact reason he is transferring though. He probably understands at this point that the NBA is a long shot for him. His two options were to continue at U.K. while being recruited over and share a majority of the minutes or transfer somewhere he would be a starter and a main option on the team instead of a cog in the machine. Might as well live out his glory years of basketball and get as many minutes as he possible while he still has some time left in college. It's unfortunate for us because he is the type of player we need to build continuity, stability, and leadership but we just can't retain those types of players. The straw that broke the camels back was the recruitment of EJ. That sent the message to SKJ that Cal didn't have enough trust in him to be a main option next year even though he would be a Junior. That would've resulted in EJ getting more minutes than SKJ throughout the regular season in order to try and reach EJ's maximum potential come March. It's a lose lose situation and I'm not quite sure how we get out of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: richbrookstomato

KDCats11

All-Conference
Mar 9, 2008
19,704
3,072
113
The debate rages on. One group will see this as an opportunity to add an unproven recruit and others will see a potential Darius Miller or Josh Harrellson gone. I’m sure some were glad when a player left to make room for SKJ. Best of luck SKJ, maybe you’ll become a Charles Matthews.
Or maybe he'll become a Stacey Poole or Ryan Harrow, we don't know. Darius was a consistent role player on each of his 4 years at UK. The coaches apparently saw enough from him in the hundreds of workouts and practices to give him PT. Harrellson was only given his shot because Kanter was ruled ineligible. Now, I love Jorts, but tell me, is he a better player than Enes Kanter? The point is that we can't have our cake and eat it too.

Guys like Matthews, Wiltjer, Poole, and Harrow did what they thought was in their best interests. They didn't want to stay and compete for minutes so they went to different situations. Some worked out and some didn't. What you're proposing is to stop recruiting elite talent in hopes of appeasing the 7th or 8th players to amount enough experience to offset your looming talent disadvantage. Why do you want Cal to stop recruiting elite players? I personally like competing for Final Fours and playing our best ball in March every year, but I guess some just prefer the occasional great team every 4 years strategy like you do.
 

docholiday51

Heisman
Oct 19, 2001
22,011
26,718
0
You think we lose 6 to the NBA off sweet 16 team?
Probably not but it not beyond possible.That is always on the table here at UK(not saying it is right or wrong or Cal's fault) but it is how things go here.There is no need to try and dance around it or pretend it doesn't exist,it is what it is.

Trading SKJ for Montgomery is probably a good thing,if we trade SGA and Diallo for Hagans it is probably O K too(SGA ,like Knox ,was a long shot at staying anyway.There was little doubt that 4 would go and there may be more to come.

We were in a world of hurt with a 3 man class,that is why Cal kept working at signing other players,was it that hard to see?
 

Beatle Bum

Heisman
Sep 1, 2002
41,506
63,354
113
SKJ is young. He stil has NBA potential. The kid has a nice shot and started this past season to demonstrate better response time on defense. He is still filling out. Wish him well.
 

Shaudylo

Heisman
Apr 2, 2011
11,442
25,654
112
I understand, but then people will complain that we're not signing any multi-year players. The problem being that when we do sign players we expect to fill those roles, they end up exceeding expectations and being Lottery Picks after one season like Booker and Shai, or transferring.
Oh yeah I agree with you . I don’t care how Cal recruits as long as he gets who he wants . I’m disappointed that SKJ left but like you said some of the multi year guys we recruited ended up good enough to leave after one year.

Others like SKJ and Matthews decided not to stick around . Not a lot Cal can do about that
 

CatColumbia

All-Conference
Apr 19, 2014
5,934
3,139
0
What's the big deal about Senior Day? If you miss the singing of My Old Kentucky Home just Google it.

I guess you are not appreciative of the commitment that Hawkins, Willis and Miller made for four years in this program.
 

MWes11

Heisman
Apr 22, 2012
12,025
10,106
0
The full court press on EJ was in direct correlation to SKJ wanting to transfer. Cal has known this for over a week now and most say SKJ transferring was a few months in the making. SKJ transferring due to the commitment of EJ isn't true. It was the other way around.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GonzoCat90

white10

All-Conference
Jan 7, 2005
1,414
1,363
0
I wish him well


Now to all the foolishness of fans !! The kid struggled at times this year playing with a bunch of freshmen. He could t make a shot from the short Conner standing wide open!! Please give it a rest people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lady wildcat

JC CATS

Heisman
Jun 18, 2009
23,517
12,221
0
Probably not but it not beyond possible.That is always on the table here at UK(not saying it is right or wrong or Cal's fault) but it is how things go here.There is no need to try and dance around it or pretend it doesn't exist,it is what it is.

Trading SKJ for Montgomery is probably a good thing,if we trade SGA and Diallo for Hagans it is probably O K too(SGA ,like Knox ,was a long shot at staying anyway.There was little doubt that 4 would go and there may be more to come.

We were in a world of hurt with a 3 man class,that is why Cal kept working at signing other players,was it that hard to see?
It is possible but I would be shocked if we lost PJ or Vanderbilt. They would definitely be listening to the wrong advice if so
 
Jan 3, 2003
145,534
15,709
0
This is why we need 1-3 KY boys on the team.... its our only chance at having a decent senior on the team

A "decent KY boy" is rare. The state for whatever reason just doesn't create many. And the few that do turn out decent, 4 years earlier when they were in HS looked just like 20 other kids that didn't develop. We could select 1 KY kid each year, and odds are we would have a decent one as a JR or SR once every 5 or 6 years.
 

CatColumbia

All-Conference
Apr 19, 2014
5,934
3,139
0
If he doesn't want to be here and compete, then he is free to leave. Just wondering how this falls on Cal? You think Cal brought him in and said, "you should leave"? No. Seems like SKJ wants a place to shine and get as much floor time and attention as possible, and that is fine for him.

Obviously you don't follow closely during the year. Cal has a shorter leash on certain players. SKJ and Humphries are two that stick out in my mind. Any little mistake he would send them to the bench and keep them there. Of course they want to transfer and that's fine, until February when we are losing a lot of games due to inexperience and this boards is in shambles.
 

Blue Decade

All-American
May 3, 2013
10,266
6,034
0
Eh I hoped no one would leave but I get it . He was never going to see the floor next season if no one left. Wish him the best. The he should of played Richards stuff is silly and not even worth commenting on. One is a high level prospect and one isn't .
Agree. Let’s drill down on this. SKJ has some upside, but he averaged 3.3 points and 13 minutes a game. He is getting better, but he isn’t in our top 7. I had a chance this year to stand near SKJ and Wenyen Gabriel. Honestly, Wenyen is at least an inch taller than Sasha. I believe Sasha is between 6-8 and 6-9. He is listed at 6-10 on UK’s official roster, but there is no way. Washington and Vanderbilt will test the NBA waters, but they will almost surely come back for another year. Our roster for next year is Richards, Vanderbilt, Gabriel, Montgomery, Washington, Johnson, Herro, Baker, Green, Quickley, and probably Hagans. That’s 11. Calipari still has time to add another reclassification besides Hagans over the summer. SKJ saw the handwriting on the wall. Calipari is committed to Richards and Montgomery, plus Wiseman will be here soon. SKJ correctly saw that his playing time was not going to increase. And let's be honest. SKJ isn’t a bad player, but he isn’t particularly big or particularly skilled. He is making the right decision.
 

track42

Heisman
Feb 18, 2017
6,597
15,047
0
The full court press on EJ was in direct correlation to SKJ wanting to transfer. Cal has known this for over a week now and most say SKJ transferring was a few months in the making. SKJ transferring due to the commitment of EJ isn't true. It was the other way around.
I was thinking the same thing.Do people really think SKJ just woke up today and decided to transfer without Cal having a clue?
 

Mime-Is-Money

All-Conference
May 29, 2002
8,568
2,172
113
I wish it worked out for SKJ here but, like others said, if we keep PJ, Vanderbilt, and Gabriel while adding Montgomery than Sacha wasn't going to see the court. He's solid, but not as effective as the 4 mentioned.

That being said, I hope nothing but the best for him, no matter where he lands.
 

TankedCat

Heisman
Nov 8, 2006
22,792
21,500
0
there was some discussion about him and Richard seemingly pouting on the bench in a game winding down where we had a sizeable lead. Its probably hard to turn that train around once its gets going.
 

caneintally

Heisman
Oct 1, 2002
27,455
17,056
0
Oh, trust me, I feel the same way you do. With EJ I feel that we need to keep at least one of Washington/Vanderbilt & Gabriel if we wanna be serious contenders. Maybe more.
If every other big man comes back ( which I expect will happen) UK will have a top 2-3 front court . Every player in our front court minus Gabriel is a 1st round prospect . Richards deservedly got a ton of slack in SEC play but that kid is uber talented he just needs to gain confidence. We saw earlier in the season when he was confident how good he could be and even that was scratching the surface. He is a project but in the way Magloire or Nazr was ie a project who can be a 1st rounder.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Decade

morgousky

Heisman
Sep 5, 2009
23,959
43,170
0
"under Cal." [laughing]

What do you propose to stop this singularly occurring phenomenon that is so unique to Kentucky basketball?

It's only going to get worse. Anytime transfer is here, people don't realize how bad things can get until they destroy it.