I teach a course called "How People Learn" and we do about two weeks on behaviourism. About two thirds of the class are training to become elementary teachers and they will use a lot of behavioural techniques (whether they realize they are doing it or not), especially in classroom management and work with special needs kids. Nobody else covers it in our training program, so I include it in the course. But, I focus more on information processing and cognitive approaches.
. . . . Hobbs will be classified or judged more on this hire than Ash . . . .
We're already surprised at some of the people he's interviewing. Looking at you, Jay Williams.Hobbs is great AD. And we will all be surprised by his choice.
What exactly was the info he brought to the table? Thread was unnecessary without any real details.
What news? Isn't OP an insurance broker
That is very accurate.At the time it was posted, Hurley was a virtual lock and as the day progressed second thoughts arose leaving the search back to wide open.
DOESN'T HAVE THE CONFIDENCE TO COME BACK HOME AND SAVE THE PROGRAM IN HIS OLD BACK YARD. (oooops, sorry for the caps lock)..me neither lol.Hurley
it would not be surprising if Hurley does what he did last time--that's why no one should count anyone in or out and that's why all this premature speculation is a waste--except for the usual cast of those waiting/relishing for their time to complain again and again
Hurley or Lonergan would be great, let's just lock one of them in ASAP!There he is ...Mr. calling the kettle black. Who is your choice and explain why?
That's a solid offer to Hurley. If Hurley wusses out and doesn't take it, that's definitely not on Hobbs or RU!From zags...ball is in Hurley's court. We have offered around $2M a year for 6 years. One of his sources says everyday that goes by it is less likely he takes it.
Other candidates are Lonergan, Williams, Pinkiell, Cluess and Boyle.
it would not be surprising if Hurley does what he did last time--that's why no one should count anyone in or out and that's why all this premature speculation is a waste--except for the usual cast of those waiting/relishing for their time to complain again and again
From zags...ball is in Hurley's court. We have offered around $2M a year for 6 years. One of his sources says everyday that goes by it is less likely he takes it.
Other candidates are Lonergan, Williams, Pinkiell, Cluess and Boyle.
https://www.sny.tv/college-recruiti...talks-to-jay-williams-mike-lonergan/167542634
From zags...ball is in Hurley's court. We have offered around $2M a year for 6 years. One of his sources says everyday that goes by it is less likely he takes it.
Other candidates are Lonergan, Williams, Pinkiell, Cluess and Boyle.
https://www.sny.tv/college-recruiti...talks-to-jay-williams-mike-lonergan/167542634
From zags...ball is in Hurley's court. We have offered around $2M a year for 6 years. One of his sources says everyday that goes by it is less likely he takes it.
Other candidates are Lonergan, Williams, Pinkiell, Cluess and Boyle.
https://www.sny.tv/college-recruiti...talks-to-jay-williams-mike-lonergan/167542634
If true very strong offer. If he doesn't take it then goodbye he didn't want to be here. No problem moving on.
If what Zags is reporting is accurate (and I have no idea whether it is), I believe the true issue for Hurley and others is the commitment to the program. I see this as the critical challenge in the coaching search. Folks are unwilling to place their careers at risk even for substantial money. This is what these guys do - they are not simply interested in cashing a paycheck with little chance for on court success. If RU is telling candidates "just trust us - we are committed" that is likely not going to get it done for worthy candidates with options.
What ever happened to SENDEK? Who on this board posted the report that he was already assembling a staff to come here? And not one peep about him since Jordan's been fired...
All it "sounds" like to me is DH wants more $$$.
If what Zags is reporting is accurate (and I have no idea whether it is), I believe the true issue for Hurley and others is the commitment to the program. I see this as the critical challenge in the coaching search. Folks are unwilling to place their careers at risk even for substantial money. This is what these guys do - they are not simply interested in cashing a paycheck with little chance for on court success. If RU is telling candidates "just trust us - we are committed" that is likely not going to get it done for worthy candidates with options.
Jesus Bac, take a break. Questions: does someone pay you to sit around and post 300 times a day; and, do we need to put your on suicide watch if this doesn't go the way you want it to go?I dont deny this either
more likely Hurley waiting for the Brinks truck to be spotted on the URI campus.Maybe a snag with higher ups?
How about Chris Mooney, from Richmond. Princeton grad, Philadelphia area roots, successful track record. Just a thought. I'd like to get away from the usual Iona, Manhattan, etc. suspects.
Exactly!All it "sounds" like to me is DH wants more $$$.
The longer term thing, if true, kills me. So easy to use it as a negative when recruiting against us in the next couple of years. "Rutgers? No offense, son, but even Coach Hurley doesn't think they will be good for the next few years. Why else do you think he demanded a seven year contract? You might sniff the NIT as a senior if you are lucky. Or you can come here (fill in school) and compete for the big dance every year."Or longer term