I have been thinking about something. We have heard since Frost was hired that this is a process and it is going to take time. After the beat down last night the eternal optimists continual preach this is a 5, 6, 7 or 8 year rebuild. Ground up they say.
So, for those way smarter than me, why does it take a place like Nebraska so long? For a program like Indiana, or Rutgers or even NW type teams, I could see it. They literally have to start from the ground up. Building better facilities, building a fan base/ support for the program, getting the right coaches, trying to build good recruiting connection. Then using those connection to build a good talent base. Then another few years to develop that talent and get a system in place.
In a place like Nebraska yes we haven't had the W-L success as we saw in the 90s, but we have huge advantage compared to many other school looking to "rebuild". We have pretty good facilities already. We have the most loyal fan base in the country. We are already able to get top 25 recruiting classes pretty consistently. We are nationally recognized as a blue blood, so we still hold at least a little recognition when trying to recruit across the country.
So what is it that should take us half a decade to get this up and running, at least to the point of not getting destroyed year 2 by Ohio St. Or letting teams like South Alabama hang with us till the end. Yes I know we hear things like, "it took 20 years to bring down it will take more than 2 to build it" again, why? What do the last 20 years of failure have to do with today's coaches or today's players? The only thing I could maybe blame on the past is S&C and player development from Riley. What the old coach did or didn't do prior to MR is irrelevant at this point. I am no coach, could 3 years of poor S&C really set a program back 5-8 years. Im not sure how poor the S&C really was. The results we are seeing would indicate there was no program in place for S&C although most of the former players say there was.
So, for those way smarter than me, why does it take a place like Nebraska so long? For a program like Indiana, or Rutgers or even NW type teams, I could see it. They literally have to start from the ground up. Building better facilities, building a fan base/ support for the program, getting the right coaches, trying to build good recruiting connection. Then using those connection to build a good talent base. Then another few years to develop that talent and get a system in place.
In a place like Nebraska yes we haven't had the W-L success as we saw in the 90s, but we have huge advantage compared to many other school looking to "rebuild". We have pretty good facilities already. We have the most loyal fan base in the country. We are already able to get top 25 recruiting classes pretty consistently. We are nationally recognized as a blue blood, so we still hold at least a little recognition when trying to recruit across the country.
So what is it that should take us half a decade to get this up and running, at least to the point of not getting destroyed year 2 by Ohio St. Or letting teams like South Alabama hang with us till the end. Yes I know we hear things like, "it took 20 years to bring down it will take more than 2 to build it" again, why? What do the last 20 years of failure have to do with today's coaches or today's players? The only thing I could maybe blame on the past is S&C and player development from Riley. What the old coach did or didn't do prior to MR is irrelevant at this point. I am no coach, could 3 years of poor S&C really set a program back 5-8 years. Im not sure how poor the S&C really was. The results we are seeing would indicate there was no program in place for S&C although most of the former players say there was.