Put UCF in the Playoff

OHPAHusker

Sophomore
Apr 3, 2012
236
190
43
There are four undefeated teams. OSU lost by 29 to a .500 team so who cares what they do to NW? OU has a loss and no defense. Georgia blew their chance.
 

1 nu rugby_rivals

Sophomore
Sep 1, 2004
663
184
0
UCF is in the NYD 6 vs LSU Fiesta Bowl, is the latest bowl projection
with OU at Bama in Orange, and Notre Dame v Clemson in Cotton
 

Harry Caray

All-American
Feb 28, 2002
71,000
7,227
113
So it will be 3rd time in 4 years that Clemson, Alabama, and Oklahoma all make the playoffs. And it's likely Alabama and Clemson will meet for the 4th year in a row.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mmunso7
Aug 18, 2016
16,645
10,920
113
There are four undefeated teams. OSU lost by 29 to a .500 team so who cares what they do to NW? OU has a loss and no defense. Georgia blew their chance.

Funny how that .500 team is just a .500 team when trying to eliminate OSU from the CFP, but that same team is a well coached juggernaut when they kicked our ***.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bmguy88
Aug 16, 2015
480
192
0
The playoff will expand soon, that's why I root for chaos. It should have been 8 from the start, no more. That is what it needs to be, tired of hearing who has the best loss. If there isn't an obvious line between Oklahoma and Ohio State there will always be questions. One of these years we will get 5 undefeated P5 champions and potentially Notre Dame and UCF.
 

Truehuskerfan

All-Conference
May 1, 2003
15,270
3,020
0
That’s right, I forgot that we beat ourselves. Being down 35-14 was all due to Nebraska.
35-14 was not the final score. It was 42-28. That is not an ***-kicking. I guess the final score doesn't matter to you because it doesn't fit your narrative. I love it how you constantly set yourself up above everyone else and play the hypocrisy police, but then you conveniently leave out parts of the story when it doesn't fit your own carefully crafted narrative of trying to make us look as bad as possible. Of course a fan who is looking for positives would also point out that we improved after that game. But again, not part of your narrative. Positives? Who wants that?
 
Nov 30, 2018
105
64
0
Funny how that .500 team is just a .500 team when trying to eliminate OSU from the CFP, but that same team is a well coached juggernaut when they kicked our ***.
You sure piss and moan a lot, must be weird to delight in fighting with strangers online so much lmao

I say put UCF in the playoff so we can just go ahead and nip this whole thing in the bud. Let Alabama boat race them once so we don't have to listen to it anymore.
 

bigboxes

All-American
Sep 4, 2004
46,242
6,784
113
35-14 was not the final score. It was 42-28. That is not an ***-kicking. I guess the final score doesn't matter to you because it doesn't fit your narrative. I love it how you constantly set yourself up above everyone else and play the hypocrisy police, but then you conveniently leave out parts of the story when it doesn't fit your own carefully crafted narrative of trying to make us look as bad as possible. Of course a fan who is looking for positives would also point out that we improved after that game. But again, not part of your narrative.

I like Tuco, True. You are cool, but Tuco makes a lot of sense.
 

Truehuskerfan

All-Conference
May 1, 2003
15,270
3,020
0
I like Tuco, True. You are cool, but Tuco makes a lot of sense.
In what way? Is 42-28 an ***-kicking in your book? Did we improve after that game? I never thought Purdue was a well-coached juggernaut. I think we were the better team and should have won that game, and would have had we played later in the year when we were playing better.
 

cubsker_rivals142943

All-Conference
May 29, 2003
18,603
3,797
0
Used to be one of the better, more reasonable posters. Is obv knowledgeable about football, but it's just a nonstop bitchfest now.
 

K_Y_E

Junior
Sep 9, 2018
1,469
267
0
They absolutely do not belong. You can’t play that **** schedule and just proclaim yourself the champs at the end. They have to get up for one or two games each year, the rest are bye weeks. The wear and tear of playing in a P5 is substantial.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EATAFAT1
Nov 30, 2018
105
64
0
They absolutely do not belong. You can’t play that **** schedule and just proclaim yourself the champs at the end. They have to get up for one or two games each year, the rest are bye weeks. The wear and tear of playing in a P5 is substantial.
what an insightful hot take. haven't read this 6 times in the past 10 replies. thank you for the contribution and opening everyone's eyes!
 

HuskerO58

All-Conference
Sep 11, 2006
14,110
2,308
113
In what way? Is 42-28 an ***-kicking in your book? Did we improve after that game? I never thought Purdue was a well-coached juggernaut. I think we were the better team and should have won that game, and would have had we played later in the year when we were playing better.
14 point loss may not be an *** kicking, but it's not like we kept it close after the 1st quarter. Purdue did finish at only 6-6
 

Truehuskerfan

All-Conference
May 1, 2003
15,270
3,020
0
14 point loss may not be an *** kicking, but it's not like we kept it close after the 1st quarter. Purdue did finish at only 6-6
Outgained them 582-516. The one key stat-136 yards in penalties(some of which were dubious at best). Clean the penalties up and we probably win that game. We had cleaned up the penalty problem for the most part by the end of the season. Bottom line I think is that outcome did not reflect the relative strength of the two teams at the time, and certainly not by the end of the season.