There are four undefeated teams. OSU lost by 29 to a .500 team so who cares what they do to NW? OU has a loss and no defense. Georgia blew their chance.
So it will be 3rd time in 4 years that Clemson, Alabama, and Oklahoma all make the playoffs. And it's likely Alabama and Clemson will meet for the 4th year in a row.
Yup. I'm hoping they see Georgia, Ohio St or Oklahoma. Which either one of those 3 teams are going to be pissed they didnt make the playoffs and will actually give it their all against UCF.I would love to see UCF draw Georgia or Michigan.
There are four undefeated teams. OSU lost by 29 to a .500 team so who cares what they do to NW? OU has a loss and no defense. Georgia blew their chance.
North Dakota State plays a tougher schedule than UCF. Join the Power 5 if you want a shot at the natty.
We have very different definitions of *** kickings if Purdue kicked our ***.
35-14 was not the final score. It was 42-28. That is not an ***-kicking. I guess the final score doesn't matter to you because it doesn't fit your narrative. I love it how you constantly set yourself up above everyone else and play the hypocrisy police, but then you conveniently leave out parts of the story when it doesn't fit your own carefully crafted narrative of trying to make us look as bad as possible. Of course a fan who is looking for positives would also point out that we improved after that game. But again, not part of your narrative. Positives? Who wants that?That’s right, I forgot that we beat ourselves. Being down 35-14 was all due to Nebraska.
You sure piss and moan a lot, must be weird to delight in fighting with strangers online so much lmaoFunny how that .500 team is just a .500 team when trying to eliminate OSU from the CFP, but that same team is a well coached juggernaut when they kicked our ***.
35-14 was not the final score. It was 42-28. That is not an ***-kicking. I guess the final score doesn't matter to you because it doesn't fit your narrative. I love it how you constantly set yourself up above everyone else and play the hypocrisy police, but then you conveniently leave out parts of the story when it doesn't fit your own carefully crafted narrative of trying to make us look as bad as possible. Of course a fan who is looking for positives would also point out that we improved after that game. But again, not part of your narrative.
In what way? Is 42-28 an ***-kicking in your book? Did we improve after that game? I never thought Purdue was a well-coached juggernaut. I think we were the better team and should have won that game, and would have had we played later in the year when we were playing better.I like Tuco, True. You are cool, but Tuco makes a lot of sense.
That’s right, I forgot that we beat ourselves. Being down 35-14 was all due to Nebraska.
Probably gets bossed around at work so he has to play tough guy on the internet. Guarantee he's super passive in person lolYou sure have turned into a *****
Not Auburn.Everyone of those team, plus at least a dozen others would be undefeated with UCF’s schedule.
what an insightful hot take. haven't read this 6 times in the past 10 replies. thank you for the contribution and opening everyone's eyes!They absolutely do not belong. You can’t play that **** schedule and just proclaim yourself the champs at the end. They have to get up for one or two games each year, the rest are bye weeks. The wear and tear of playing in a P5 is substantial.
Auburn isn’t very good this year and you shouldn’t mistake this year’s UCF team with last years.Not Auburn.
what an insightful hot take. haven't read this 6 times in the past 10 replies. thank you for the contribution and opening everyone's eyes!
UCF doesn't belong in a 4 team playoff, 8 maybe
14 point loss may not be an *** kicking, but it's not like we kept it close after the 1st quarter. Purdue did finish at only 6-6In what way? Is 42-28 an ***-kicking in your book? Did we improve after that game? I never thought Purdue was a well-coached juggernaut. I think we were the better team and should have won that game, and would have had we played later in the year when we were playing better.
Outgained them 582-516. The one key stat-136 yards in penalties(some of which were dubious at best). Clean the penalties up and we probably win that game. We had cleaned up the penalty problem for the most part by the end of the season. Bottom line I think is that outcome did not reflect the relative strength of the two teams at the time, and certainly not by the end of the season.14 point loss may not be an *** kicking, but it's not like we kept it close after the 1st quarter. Purdue did finish at only 6-6