PSU Recruiting Thread

[Corby2]

FIFY

Good s*it that made me laugh

 

[LB99]

So they developed for 10 years but not the last 7?

Who? Give me the list of overachievers under the Brands in the last 10 years…….

 

[Corby2]

Who? Give me the list of overachievers under the Brands in the last 10 years…….

I sent you the article on recruiting rankings 8.6 average over 10 years and averaged 3rd at NCAA. So you want to answer a ? with a ? no thanks have a good day LB

 

[Nitlion1986]

Point being teams have 20 guys who don't start and not everyone is a NCAA champ every year. You can win at many places these days and regardless of what you guys say Iowa is still one of them

Guys go to all kinds of schools and win matches. The back and forth here started with what "elite" kids want to accomplish. If winning a national title is a true and reasonable goal for an "elite" recruit, no Iowa is not a very logical choice. They do not typically develop national champs.
If going to a program that has an unbelievable history, strong fan support and will develop you into one tough SOB who wins a majority of your competitive opportunities but almost certainly will not end with you winning a national title then Iowa is your program.

 

[a_mshaffer]

I sent you the article on recruiting rankings 8.6 average over 10 years and averaged 3rd at NCAA. So you want to answer a ? with a ? no thanks have a good day LB

I think everyone reasonable understood your premise. Regardless of responses, this is where you don't need to respond as it seems desperate to make a point that was already made. Let it go with a smile - can't change the world on social media

 

[LB99]

I sent you the article on recruiting rankings 8.6 average over 10 years and averaged 3rd at NCAA. So you want to answer a ? with a ? no thanks have a good day LB

You sent me an eight year old article that is irrelevant now. You have no answers or data to back up your “facts”. Have a good day Corby.

 

[tullfan68]

LOL overachievers under Brands all the kids on the other teams!!

 

[Corby2]

Guys go to all kinds of schools and win matches. The back and forth here started with what "elite" kids want to accomplish. If winning a national title is a true and reasonable goal for an "elite" recruit, no Iowa is not a very logical choice. They do not typically develop national champs.
If going to a program that has an unbelievable history, strong fan support and will develop you into one tough SOB who wins a majority of your competitive opportunities but almost certainly will not end with you winning a national title then Iowa is your program.

Yep and you can win NCAAs at many places and Iowa is still one regardless who hates them.

 

[Corby2]

I think everyone reasonable understood your premise. Regardless of responses, this is where you don't need to respond as it seems desperate to make a point that was already made. Let it go with a smile - can't change the world on social media

Nope we all have opinions mine just doesn't sit well here and that's ok. I already said have a good day LB I'm done with it .

 

[Cali_Nittany1]

Yep and you can win NCAAs at many places and Iowa is still one regardless who hates them.

To Iowa's rescue!

 

[Corby2]

To Iowa's rescue!

You guys made it this way now I have a role to play here

 

[Cali_Nittany1]

Yep and you can win NCAAs at many places and Iowa is still one regardless who hates them.

Its just your odds at winning at Iowa are over 83% less than they used to be. At least you keep your pointless arguments and goal post moving to a couple of sentences instead of tomes, like your fellow Iowa fan, MSU.

 

[El_Jefe]

You guys made it this way now I have a role to play here

Sorry, you jumped head first into this: