Possible Breakthrough Vaccine Available this Fall

Digging dog

Sophomore
Aug 22, 2012
3,503
134
63
Even more promising is Gilead may have a drug for this virus.

Getting the virus and knowing you’ve got a treatment is about as good as a vaccine I believe.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,581
7,965
113
https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-fall-2020-4

This could be fantastic news and they are already testing in Germany and plan to start testing in the states next week. One could assume this type of trial could be done rather quickly over 1-2 months.

If this works out and is available mid fall like they hope it is a game changer for sure!!
I read the article where they talked to one of the guys doing the study. He said it is no magic bullet and it does not help everyone. He specifically said it is NOT a cure. He said it may help some. The numbers he reported backed him up, sort of. There was no control so it's hard to really say.

Edited to add: This was aimed at the treatment post, not the vaccine. That they have taken a vaccine that far this fast is nothing short of amazing.
 

Go Budaw

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
7,321
0
36
Question, what qualifies as “emergency use”? Obviously there will be finite quantities of this vaccine in the early going, even in a best-case scenario. So is “emergency use” defined by high-risk individuals (elderly, nursing home patients, immunocompromised, etc.)?
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,581
7,965
113
Question, what qualifies as “emergency use”? Obviously there will be finite quantities of this vaccine in the early going, even in a best-case scenario. So is “emergency use” defined by high-risk individuals (elderly, nursing home patients, immunocompromised, etc.)?
If it's like many of those healthcare workers will be the first priority.
 

Hubcitydog

Redshirt
Dec 18, 2013
100
0
0
I’m a healthcare worker, so I’ll be taking it when available and I am a strong believer in vaccines- but let’s have a small poll on who will willingly get this vaccine with this much time for development and testing. Now we may all be forced to get it but I’d like to get a few peoples thoughts.
 

00Dawg

Senior
Nov 10, 2009
3,298
564
93
I won't be in the first wave.

Under 50 and in good health so I'm really low risk for hospitalization, let alone death, plus not in a critical job and can work remote.
I'll get it earlier than I let my kids have it, though. Since they have no underlying health conditions, their mortality risk even if they caught COVID-19 is nearing statistically insignificant.

I'm not far from "you'll have to legally require it" before I'd give something to my kids in that time frame.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,581
7,965
113
I’m a healthcare worker, so I’ll be taking it when available and I am a strong believer in vaccines- but let’s have a small poll on who will willingly get this vaccine with this much time for development and testing. Now we may all be forced to get it but I’d like to get a few peoples thoughts.
I'm a healthcare worker in my late 50s. I'll be as close to first in line as I can get. Heck I'd volunterr for the trial.
 

MTNDawg.sixpack

Redshirt
Oct 17, 2007
156
11
18
The healthy 40-something year-old on death's door in New Orleans (the story was linked here) went from not going to make it to complete recovery after the docs gave him the Gilead remdesivir. It might not work for everyone, but it worked for him specifically.
 

EngDawg

Redshirt
Mar 29, 2016
2,037
4
38
I read the article where they talked to one of the guys doing the study. He said it is no magic bullet and it does not help everyone. He specifically said it is NOT a cure. He said it may help some. The numbers he reported backed him up, sort of. There was no control so it's hard to really say.

Edited to add: This was aimed at the treatment post, not the vaccine. That they have taken a vaccine that far this fast is nothing short of amazing.

There was a control group with the results released today. There was a statistically significant difference regarding recovery times, but not fatality rate. That being said, the improvement in fatality rate (8% vs 11.6%) was not far from being statistically significant (P=0.059) so it will be interesting to see what happens with larger study sizes.

Overall though, it definitely isn’t a miracle drug, at least when given late in the disease.
 

codeDawg

Redshirt
Nov 13, 2007
2,102
0
36
There was a control group with the results released today. There was a statistically significant difference regarding recovery times, but not fatality rate. That being said, the improvement in fatality rate (8% vs 11.6%) was not far from being statistically significant (P=0.059) so it will be interesting to see what happens with larger study sizes.

Overall though, it definitely isn’t a miracle drug, at least when given late in the disease.

Yeah, not a miracle drug, but so far it's reducing time to recovery without severe side effects. Still a lot more research to do, but promising to get data from studies done with control groups and other methods you need to ensure the credibility of the data.
 

L4Dawg

All-American
Oct 27, 2016
11,581
7,965
113
There was a control group with the results released today. There was a statistically significant difference regarding recovery times, but not fatality rate. That being said, the improvement in fatality rate (8% vs 11.6%) was not far from being statistically significant (P=0.059) so it will be interesting to see what happens with larger study sizes.

Overall though, it definitely isnÂ’t a miracle drug, at least when given late in the disease.
I missed the control group release. It would be interesting to see one when it was given early on.
 

Crazy Cotton

All-Conference
Aug 26, 2012
3,821
1,549
113
The production ramp up, based on Gilead's website, is not going to be quick. This was apparently a mothballed Ebola drug so supply is severely limited. They restarted pre-production quickly and a while back, but components are apparently globally sourced, and some of them take weeks from start to end of production.
 

TNT.sixpack

Redshirt
Nov 4, 2014
819
43
28
I read the article where they talked to one of the guys doing the study. He said it is no magic bullet and it does not help everyone. He specifically said it is NOT a cure. He said it may help some. The numbers he reported backed him up, sort of. There was no control so it's hard to really say.

Edited to add: This was aimed at the treatment post, not the vaccine. That they have taken a vaccine that far this fast is nothing short of amazing.

China already tested it and they scrapped the test because it was giving the results they hoped for.
 

CowDoc.sixpack

Redshirt
Apr 4, 2017
7
0
1
I'd take it. Most hurdles to approval are meaningless government red tape anyway.

Please explain what you mean by this. After 15+ yrs in drug development I completely disagree. Most people don’t realize the extent pharma companies go to prove their products are safe and effective.
 

BELdog

Sophomore
Aug 23, 2012
1,166
117
58
I’m a healthcare worker, so I’ll be taking it when available and I am a strong believer in vaccines- but let’s have a small poll on who will willingly get this vaccine with this much time for development and testing. Now we may all be forced to get it but I’d like to get a few peoples thoughts.

Forced to get it? Who’s going to be forcing it on us? Who’s going to allow it to be forced on them?
 
Maroon and White

Latest

  1. 01 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State needs to build on fast starts in 2026
  2. 02 Maroon and White Under the Microscope: Mississippi State positions on close watch early in 2026 season
  3. 03 Maroon and White Proving time for Mississippi State's "Developmental Program" Goal
  4. 04 Maroon and White Mississippi State Depth Chart Deep Dive: Defense
  5. 05 Maroon and White Football Mississippi State Depth Chart Deep Dive: Offense