Why is it so hard for you to be objective?Looking forward to six months of "Did he sign yet?" posts.
Why is it so hard for you to be objective?Looking forward to six months of "Did he sign yet?" posts.
Dave is right. Just enjoy the commitment. It’s okay to have nice things as a Rutgers fan. Things are on the up as a Rutgers fan. There is a 99% chance he stays committed. Why worry about it?Why is it so hard for you to be objective?
Why is it so hard for you to be objective?
Why is it so hard for you to be objective?
I’m not talking about this commitment specifically. Both SantaFe and I enjoyed this commitment. But it makes no sense for Dave to say something like that. The criticisms about Pike were not wrong.Dave is right. Just enjoy the commitment. It’s okay to have nice things as a Rutgers fan. Things are on the up as a Rutgers fan. There is a 99% chance he stays committed. Why worry about it?
i don’t understand this. I am a fan. By nature fans are biased and something good happened. I am excited and have been on this board long enough to know everyone is going to worry. There is a group of people who bend over backward to point out the negative anytime something good happens and then when called on it suddenly get in a huff and call themselves “objective.”
a good thing happened to Rutgers. Several good things this week. Be excited!
To say something like “I can’t wait for six months of ‘did he sign yet?’ Posts?” Because historically on this board there’s a ton of posts like these any time we get a big time commit because 50% of this board always expects our best players to decommit even though it is pretty rare in hoops.I’m not talking about this commitment specifically. Both SantaFe and I enjoyed this commitment. But it makes no sense for Dave to say something like that. The criticisms about Pike were not wrong.
Lol. I don’t remember this board but I’m the only one on OTB predicted Rutgers can end up with 12-8 after the NW loss.Why is it so hard for you to be optimistic?
Yes they wereI’m not talking about this commitment specifically. Both SantaFe and I enjoyed this commitment. But it makes no sense for Dave to say something like that. The criticisms about Pike were not wrong.
First I don't think these guys are talking about you here. They called out the guys who were constantly whining. About everything.I love Pike. I’ve been critical of his recruiting. SO WHAT? It’s okay to be critical when and where warranted.
Now…WOW…what an absolutely amazing job landing this kid. He gets ALL the credit in the world for this one and I hope it steamrolls from here TBH!
100%First I don't think these guys are talking about you here. They called out the guys who were constantly whining. About everything.
Second the criticism was NOT warranted. He came into a mess and landed Geo who was under the radar. Next year he gets RHJ, Caleb and Mathis. Following year he lands a 4 star in Mulcahey meanwhile bringing in transfers that helped us get to the dance 3 years in a row. Now he’s landing guys like Cliff and Gavin. Steady progression so I Don’t accept it was warranted criticism. It was BS.
Yeah...but many of us will never get back the hours of trying to reason with you.I for one congratulated Pike for landing Griffiths and also for retaining Caleb in other threads. I can only speak for myself and nice job Pike and keep it up and make us all proud.
What you say is true, but this thread is about Pike’s recruiting, and the article clearly makes the case that Pike and staff handled this superbly.I think Pike is a great coach, but I don't get too caught up in recruiting until players sign (the haters are just waiting on that chance) and especially until we get to see them play, so I don't get too low with modest rated players or too high with highly rated players. Yes, I know highly rated players, on average, will do better, but too many exceptions to that to go ga-ga over them. All that said, this looks like a great get, who will fit Pike's system well and man do we need a shooter.
Yeah...agree with this takeFirst I don't think these guys are talking about you here. They called out the guys who were constantly whining. About everything.
Second the criticism was NOT warranted. He came into a mess and landed Geo who was under the radar. Next year he gets RHJ, Caleb and Mathis. Following year he lands a 4 star in Mulcahey meanwhile bringing in transfers that helped us get to the dance 3 years in a row. Now he’s landing guys like Cliff and Gavin. Steady progression so I Don’t accept it was warranted criticism. It was BS.
The criticisms are crazy. Pike is an A+ coach and probably a B recruiter. He not a slimy sales guy and we are never going to be facing sanctions for cheating with him as coach. Enjoy it instead of criticizing.I’m not talking about this commitment specifically. Both SantaFe and I enjoyed this commitment. But it makes no sense for Dave to say something like that. The criticisms about Pike were not wrong.
It’s you who just can’t enjoy the excitement. It’s also nature that fans questioned Pike’s recruiting and offense ( but these can be changed, right?). Isn’t this thread supposed to be full of excitement and expectation? Instead, 50% of the posts here are sarcasm and personal attacks.
Revenge of the pikeeeeeezMaybe you missed the nuance but this thread is indeed supposed to be a sarcastic shot at posters who have continually claimed Pike can't recruit ad nauseum on this board.
It's not that they don't matter. It's that some people seem to think we need 2 4 stars every year to be goodFor a forum that declares star rankings don't matter so much. Their sure is alot of buzz and excitement after this commitment
Your second sentence is totally correct. Your first sentence needs work. It's a two star post overall.For a forum that declares star rankings don't matter so much. Their sure is alot of buzz and excitement after this commitment
That's a lie. Definitely a solid 3* postYour second sentence is totally correct. Your first sentence needs work. It's a two star post overall.
The criticisms are not crazy. He is not perfect and has weaknesses. So he can be criticized.The criticisms are crazy. Pike is an A+ coach and probably a B recruiter. He not a slimy sales guy and we are never going to be facing sanctions for cheating with him as coach. Enjoy it instead of criticizing.
So if your not perfect you should be criticized? I hope you don’t manage people or have kids.The criticisms are not crazy. He is not perfect and has weaknesses. So he can be criticized.
I think many have been way over the top in their very tough criticism off Pike, but you're implying nobody should be given constructive feedback ("criticism") on their performance and what things they could possibly do to perform better. (with lots of positive feedback on what they're doing well also: behavioral studies have shown the optimal mix is 4:1, positive:constructive feedback). When that kind of feedback is given (in private, generally) with the clear intent to help that person improve and not to punish them, it can be extraordinarily effective. I have managed small and large groups of people and taught hundreds of other managers these tools as a side gig at work for 15 years. And yes, it can work well at home, too, although that's more challenging to do well.So if your not perfect you should be criticized? I hope you don’t manage people or have kids.
It's not. What players are in High School is less important than what they develop into later. Pike and his staff develop talent. Players that he recruits actually get better. That hasn't been the case at RU for the better part of 3 decades.The thing that gets me about people who criticize Pike's recruiting is this. He recruited the entire roster of three straight NCAA Tournament caliber teams for a program that hadnt been there in thirty years. How is that bad recruiting?
I hope you don’t manage people or have kids. You have low expectations. Too bad your kids/employees can never learn, improve or grow.So if your not perfect you should be criticized? I hope you don’t manage people or have kids.
But it could develop!Your second sentence is totally correct. Your first sentence needs work. It's a two star post overall.
zzzI hope you don’t manage people or have kids. You have low expectations. Too bad your kids/employees can never learn, improve or grow.
On the contrary you can manage people and not be a dickhead to them and still have the learn, improve and grow. Usually they learn, improve and grow faster in supportive environments rather than ones where mistakes are not tolerated. You should try it sometimes you'd be shocked at the results.I hope you don’t manage people or have kids. You have low expectations. Too bad your kids/employees can never learn, improve or grow.
Tolerated? I never said we should fire Pike. I said we should set the bar high and Pike needs to do better in recruiting and offense if he wants more.On the contrary you can manage people and not be a dickhead to them and still have the learn, improve and grow. Usually they learn, improve and grow faster in supportive environments rather than ones where mistakes are not tolerated. You should try it sometimes you'd be shocked at the results.
Wait now you want to talk about Pike again instead of managing people or having kids? That was a hasty retreat.Tolerated? I never said we should fire Pike. I said we should set the bar high and Pike needs to do better in recruiting and offense if he wants more.
Pointing out weakness and criticizing = not tolerating mistakes?Wait now you want to talk about Pike again instead of managing people or having kids? That was a hasty retreat.
But where does firing Pike come up? You're all over the place.
That's your opinion. All good.Second the criticism was NOT warranted. He came into a mess and landed Geo who was under the radar. Next year he gets RHJ, Caleb and Mathis. Following year he lands a 4 star in Mulcahey meanwhile bringing in transfers that helped us get to the dance 3 years in a row. Now he’s landing guys like Cliff and Gavin. Steady progression so I Don’t accept it was warranted criticism. It was BS.
So much bickering back and forth these days quoting posts to win arguments when we should all be happy with the recent revelation that quietly Rutgers began playing the game.
Hopefully we land this kid
\
Which kid? We did land Griffiths
The Knight Report
Rutgers Women's Basketball Signing Day Central: 2027 Edition
The Knight Report Football
Three Nebraska Cornhuskers to watch versus Rutgers Football
The Knight Report Wrestling
Rutgers Wrestlers in the latest InterMat Rankings - Week Two
The Knight Report
Rutgers Basketball inks Top 20 recruiting class
The Knight Report
Zachara Perkins has been the key to unlocking Rutgers Women's Basketball's 4-0 start