"Stuff like this is why we read stories of career criminals committing horrible crimes." You made the comment, surely you based this on factual data...so why be afraid to share it?You provide the data, since you commented about data
Let me pose a hypothetical to you and the other posters who take issue with this law:
Imagine you have a daughter, and she is sexually assaulted by a neighbor. Fortunately, she survives and gets away, but the only evidence is her word. Suspect gets away with it due to the lack of evidence. The suspect continues to live in the neighborhood and the father and the rest of the family routinely have to see him living his life freely, realizing he could attack her or someone else again. The father, finally reaching an emotional breaking point, shoots and kills the suspect when he sees him walking down the street. Father is convicted of aggravated murder, as it was technically a driveby. Should he spend his life in prison with no chance of parole, or should a court be able to look at all the factors, including the emotional impact of his daughter being sexually attacked by this man he killed, and determine whether he should have a shot at parole after a certain period? What would you want for yourself or someone you care about?
Another hypo: if a 16/17 yo is involved in a gang, as part of that he is ordered to perform a driveby shooting that results in death. Granted, he could have said no, but then he likely gets killed himself. So, he is caught and convicted of aggravated homicide. 30 years pass in prison, he has become devoutly religious, is a model prisoner as far as good behavior, has learned a valuable trade that provides a benefit to society. He demonstrates extreme remorse for his actions, and he has countless prison officials and others within the community advocating for his release. Shouldn't he be able to be heard before a parole board?
Changing this law allows for that. Are there going to be times someone is able to be advantaged by it that shouldn't? Most likely, but is it better to not allow those that should have the opportunity to have it?
Last edited: