OT: Mets 2026 Season Thread

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,789
38,601
113
Thank you for the free run, Nimmo. We miss you for your running hard down the first base line after a base on balls (BB!!!), but we have better outfielders now!
but we don't have a better 4th OF/DH...

And besides having the better younger OF, we also have a crappy 2B that we owe pretty much $30m a year to. Sorry- had to add that in hehe
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Knight Shift

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,789
38,601
113
I'm over Nimmo. Still suffering from Alonso withdrawal.
I would be ok- with no Nimmo except they brought in a much more expensive player who sucks and justified getting rid of a starting OF with another OF that cost just as much- who sucked.

And yeah- as much as fans try and try to get past Alonso- it is getting harder every day when he is about to lead the AL in potentially HR and RBI and will be getting MVP votes...
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
31,138
23,020
113
but we don't have a better 4th OF/DH...

And besides having the better younger OF, we also have a crappy 2B that we owe pretty much $30m a year to. Sorry- had to add that in hehe
Some backstory on the Nimmo trade that I recall reading. This is from memory, but I think I have it right.

As you know, Nimmo had a no-trade clause which he had to waive. Cohen (pretty sure it was him and not Stearns, but could be mistaken) told Nimmo that if he returned as a Met, it would be primarily as a DH. Nimmo had no intention of accepting this role if he had a choice, which he did. This was a factor in his departure.

Another factor was conversations with senior management and with deGrom. They convinced him that Texas was all-in on winning now, there was no intent to rebuild.

Nimmo accepted $1M from the Mets to waive the no-trade.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,789
38,601
113
Some backstory on the Nimmo trade that I recall reading. This is from memory, but I think I have it right.

As you know, Nimmo had a no-trade clause which he had to waive. Cohen (pretty sure it was him and not Stearns, but could be mistaken) told Nimmo that if he returned as a Met, it would be primarily as a DH. Nimmo had no intention of accepting this role if he had a choice, which he did. This was a factor in his departure.

Another factor was conversations with senior management and with deGrom. They convinced him that Texas was all-in on winning now, there was no intent to rebuild.

Nimmo accepted $1M from the Mets to waive the no-trade.
I never heard those details, but it makes sense...I really think Nimmo did love being here. I did hear about the conversation with deGrom and the Rangers on them being all in, which swayed Nimmo's decision...

I would have much rather they even just sent Nimmo off for prospects.
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
31,138
23,020
113

This is fascinating, at least to me. Rosenthal and Salmon are reporting that Falvey will have a "significant role" in team decisions. What does that mean? I guess we'll find out.

Falvey will likely be given some sort of Senior Advisor title. But advisor to whom? To Stearns, who could take or leave his input? Or maybe directly to Cohen, in which case his role might be less advisory and more oversight?
 

Zak57

Heisman
Jul 5, 2011
11,298
11,411
113
Him and Stearns used to work together in Cleveland as well. Adding smart people to the room only helps. My guess is he's reporting to Stearns directly but we'll see.
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football involved with more than 20 recruits in 2028 Rivals300
  2. 02 The Knight Report Join The Knight Report TODAY and get it for 60% off!
  3. 03 On3 Football Brian Kelly on speculation about return to coaching: 'I can do any [accent] you want'
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers Football RB Antwan Raymond talks rough start to 2026 season
  5. 05 The Knight Report The Knight Report - Ask The Experts Chat: September 23rd Edition