She's the worst.
What criteria did you use to determine "everyone" was satisfied by the resolution of this situation?
Imus apologizing and having it accepted.
The ones involved are "everyone" directly involved.
But the people inserting their own opinion are not part of that "everyone" group, in my opinion, because they weren't involved.
Here's something Imus' wife said:
>"They gave us the opportunity to listen to what they had to say and why they're hurting and how awful this is," author Deirdre Imus said.
"He feels awful," she said of her husband. "He asked them, 'I want to know the pain I caused, and I want to know how to fix this and change this.'"
Deirdre Imus also said that the Rutgers players have been receiving hate e-mail, and she demanded that it stop. She told listeners "if you must send e-mail, send it to my husband," not the team.<
So if the players on the team, CVS and staff, along with both Don & Deirdre Imus
worked it out between them, those putting their own interpretation of the incident , the apology Imus gave over that incident, Stringer and the team accepting the apology and Stringer's condolences are only proving that whatever Stringer does, they will put their own spin on it and find something wrong with it.