OT: Hiroshima 75 Years Ago

Status
Not open for further replies.

CERU00

All-Conference
Feb 10, 2005
3,626
1,677
0
Racism/xenophobia, I think. Don't have any other explanation. By the 1940's, German-Americans were just plain Americans. Japanese-Americans were not.
The US did round up some German and Italian Americans. It's a shame our history books leave out the complete story. They were treated much more fairly than Japanese Americans however.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kbee3

Yeah Baby

All-American
Aug 14, 2001
19,261
6,466
0
My point overall is that the bomb would not have been dropped on a white country just as a white immigrant group, however loathed by Americans, would never end up in a concentration camp here. It’s not a coincidence or mere happenstance is all I’m saying.
We had people who could interview and translate German POW’s. Many of them were Jews who escaped and went back to fight against the tyranny. We had few or no translators for Japanese who spied on us and surprise attacked us killing many. They bombed the hospitals in Pearl Harbor as we were trying to rescue wounded. During the battle of the Phillipines they killed between 100k and 240k Phillipines civilians. They mistreated their POW’s. They were not well liked during these war years. It was the right decision.
 

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,568
92,614
103
My point overall is that the bomb would not have been dropped on a white country just as a white immigrant group, however loathed by Americans, would never end up in a concentration camp here. It’s not a coincidence or mere happenstance is all I’m saying.
Lol
We’d of A Bombed Berlin in a heart beat if It saved 100s of thousands of young Americans lives.
Is their a difference between a camp that starves, kills and beats you, and one that doesn’t....duh
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,433
18,887
113
The Japanese were brutal in their treatment of prisoners.
From an article I read about POWs in WW II.

According to the findings of the Tokyo Tribunal, the death rate of Western prisoners was 27.1%, seven times that of POWs under the Germans and Italians.

I plan on visiting the River Kwai sight in October. It's estimated that 13,000 prisoners died just at that site alone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yeah Baby

zappaa

Heisman
Jul 27, 2001
75,568
92,614
103
I worked with senior citizens recreational centers at Branch Brook Park, Newark in the mid 90s...
The numerous WW 2 vets did not take kindly to the celebration of Japanese culture during The Cherry Blossom Festival.
It was their experiences that shaped their thoughts...
They had every right to feel anyway they wanted.
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,433
18,887
113
And without Lend/Lease?.. for which Russia paid 674 million out of 11 billion? That would be about $160B in today's dollars.. they should pay up.

Yeah.. had the USA not helped the commies they would have been defeated. Without the over 17M tons of materiel, the USA provided.. the Ruskies would not have had the tanks they needed to counter the Germans after that harsh winter.

And, yes, we could have rolled over Russia at the end of the war.. our use of massed artillery and air power and logistics with an over-extended Russian military.. yeah.. it would have happened. But there were two factors.. would the American fighting man have WANTED to fight like they had versus Germany? For the duration of the war we made the Russians our allies and friends.. they didn't act like it afterward.. seeking to dominate eastern Europe and even Germany.

We'd have all been better off having defeated worldwide communism right then and there.. and in China as well. And so would the people in China and Vietnam and North Korea and the USSR and the Balkans and Eastern Europe.

I agree with most of what you say but the American people were tired of war in 1945. Also the only way that we could have defeated Communism would have been invasion of both the USSR and the Chinese mainland.
A quick look at history shows that there haven't been many examples of success doing that
Would the world have been better of if both Stalin and Mao were defeated? Absolutely but it was going to happen then. At the end of the war we had a total of 2,000,000 serve in the European theater. The Russians had 29,000,000. Subtract casualties and they still had well over 22,000,00 under arms in 1945.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doctor Worm

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,903
19,183
113

we didn’t operate death camps (that we know of) but those were certainly concentration camps by any accepted definition.[/QUOTE]

That we know of? I'd love to see any evidence, ANY EVIDENCE !!!!!!, of the US operating death camps.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,365
62,229
113
My point overall is that the bomb would not have been dropped on a white country just as a white immigrant group, however loathed by Americans, would never end up in a concentration camp here. It’s not a coincidence or mere happenstance is all I’m saying.
That's ********. Truman dropped the bomb because the military leadership had estimated we would incur ~600K casualties trying to take Japan by conventional means. Also, they were not sure how long it would take as taking Okinawa had shown how the Japanese would battle to the death instead of surrendering. Finally, Truman was facing the prospect of waning support for the war at home, particularly after Germany had surrendered. All of that added up to the possibility that we could not get Japan to surrender. And we could not leave them there as they could possibly rearm and become aggressive again in the Eastern Pacific. So we dropped the bombs on the bluff that we could do that to every city in Japan.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,903
19,183
113
My point overall is that the bomb would not have been dropped on a white country just as a white immigrant group, however loathed by Americans, would never end up in a concentration camp here. It’s not a coincidence or mere happenstance is all I’m saying.

Well we wouldn't have dropped the bomb on Germany if our army or the Soviet Army were anywhere near the vicinity. But you have no basis, just your own personal assumption that it would not have been used if the Normandy landings hadn't taken place.

I'll say one thing about which I'm quite confident, Churchill would have pushed HARD to use it.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,365
62,229
113
The fire bombing of Tokyo killed about 100,000 Japanese; Nagasaki was 80,000; Hiroshima 140,000, Did it matter to the victims whether they were incinerated by napalm or a nuclear blast ? Japan was in deep **** even without the atomic bomb. With complete US air superiority and and endless amount of bombers and bombs, Japan's total destruction was an inevitability. I don't think an invasion was actually necessary. Curtis LeMay would have bombed them into the Stone Age
That's incorrect. The atomic blasts killed 70-80K in Hiroshima, 35-40K in Nagaski.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus10

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
115,024
54,334
102
That's ********. Truman dropped the bomb because the military leadership had estimated we would incur ~600K casualties trying to take Japan by conventional means. Also, they were not sure how long it would take as taking Okinawa had shown how the Japanese would battle to the death instead of surrendering. Finally, Truman was facing the prospect of waning support for the war at home, particularly after Germany had surrendered. All of that added up to the possibility that we could not get Japan to surrender. And we could not leave them there as they could possibly rearm and become aggressive again in the Eastern Pacific. So we dropped the bombs on the bluff that we could do that to every city in Japan.
Well we wouldn't have dropped the bomb on Germany if our army or the Soviet Army were anywhere near the vicinity. But you have no basis, just your own personal assumption that it would not have been used if the Normandy landings hadn't taken place.

I'll say one thing about which I'm quite confident, Churchill would have pushed HARD to use it.

 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,433
18,887
113
Yep. If Germany had invaded earlier they could have taken Moscow, which would have changed the whole tenor of the war.

This was Mussolini's fault. The Italians totally screwed up the invasion Greece and Hitler had to pull his nuts out of the fire. Hitler needed to secure his southern flank before Barbarossa. The few weeks that were used on Greece led to a later date for the invasion and cost the Germans come winter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: redking and mdk02

beaced_rivals

Heisman
Jul 18, 2004
32,005
10,324
113
Most likely. He used to tell me stories about navigating by the stars as they flew over Nevada. I still have his Army Air Force uniform.
Your Dad had to be a few years older than me,so I am presuming that he is gone. Sorry for that.Did he ever tell you where he did his Basic Training? I did mine at BTC #10 in Greensboro,NC.I had never heard of the town before then. NOW,my oldest Daughter lives just a few miles from there.
 

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
50,365
62,229
113
Your Dad had to be a few years older than me,so I am presuming that he is gone. Sorry for that.Did he ever tell you where he did his Basic Training? I did mine at BTC #10 in Greensboro,NC.I had never heard of the town before then. NOW,my oldest Daughter lives just a few miles from there.
Yes, he passed in February, 2010. He was at a base in Alabama, then in West Texas. I can't remember either of their names.

He wanted to join when he was 17, but his mom wouldn't sign the papers. A friend of his in HS did join, was rushed through pilot's training because they didn't have enough, and was shot down and killed in his first mission in Europe. By the time my dad joined they had a logjam, so that's why he never got to the front lines before they dropped the bomb.
 

beaced_rivals

Heisman
Jul 18, 2004
32,005
10,324
113
Yes, he passed in February, 2010. He was at a base in Alabama, then in West Texas. I can't remember either of their names.

He wanted to join when he was 17, but his mom wouldn't sign the papers. A friend of his in HS did join, was rushed through pilot's training because they didn't have enough, and was shot down and killed in his first mission in Europe. By the time my dad joined they had a logjam, so that's why he never got to the front lines before they dropped the bomb.
De JaVu.That same log jam kept me from finishing my Bombadier Training.That place in Texas might have been Big Spring.I was there at one time.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,903
19,183
113
The usual suspects make great effort to paint the US as a bad actor with little or no support. I'm sure in another 100 years (maybe less) the academics will teach that Japan is owed reparations for our use of the A-bomb. Self loathing lot.

For a while I was wondering whether I had inadvertently stumbled onto a North Korean reeducation web site.
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,967
22,731
113
we didn’t operate death camps (that we know of) but those were certainly concentration camps by any accepted definition.

That we know of? I'd love to see any evidence, ANY EVIDENCE !!!!!!, of the US operating death camps.[/QUOTE]

If we don't know of them, we don't have evidence.
 

e5fdny

Heisman
Nov 11, 2002
115,024
54,334
102
The usual suspects make great effort to paint the US as a bad actor with little or no support. I'm sure in another 100 years (maybe less) the academics will teach that Japan is owed reparations for our use of the A-bomb. Self loathing lot.
For a while I was wondering whether I had inadvertently stumbled onto a North Korean reeducation web site.
Remember Thanksgiving when that one nephew got to sit at the big table for the first time after a semester of college?
 

GoodOl'Rutgers

Heisman
Sep 11, 2006
123,974
19,586
0
I agree with most of what you say but the American people were tired of war in 1945. Also the only way that we could have defeated Communism would have been invasion of both the USSR and the Chinese mainland.
A quick look at history shows that there haven't been many examples of success doing that
Would the world have been better of if both Stalin and Mao were defeated? Absolutely but it was going to happen then. At the end of the war we had a total of 2,000,000 serve in the European theater. The Russians had 29,000,000. Subtract casualties and they still had well over 22,000,00 under arms in 1945.
Well, China was in Civil war.. we would have just needed to tip the balance to Chiang Kai Shek and China would have been spared Mao's purges.

I did mention the desire to fight in my previous message. You are correct, it would have been a tough to impossible sell. As for numbers, we would have had to turn out the Europeans to fight against their occupiers.. including Germany.. yikes. There might also have been plenty of Russian who might want to fight against Stalin and his oppression as long as it wasn't to become slaves to Germans.

It was not something we could do all of a sudden at the end of the war. We would have had to have planned for it all along. And that probably would have included making a choice as to how far we'd help Russia defeat Germany.

I'm thinking now of the Iran-Iraq war. We were okay with them killing eachother.. but we wanted neither to lose. Had one side been victorious, two moderate problems would have become one HUGE problem. Maybe that is something we learned from the end of WWII.

As for the general topic of casualties and so on.. don't forget the firebombing campaigns did a lot of damage. The Tokyo firebombing devasted a city made largely of wood. Killed over 100K people. Dresden maybe 25K. I remember reading about "bat bombs" which were never deployed but were tested and were effective. The USA was going to try it against Japan. And Japan used balloon bombs.. hydrogen balloons carrying incendiaries where they hoped the entire forested northwest would be set ablaze... and later that wanted balloons to carry over THE PLAGUE.

Nuking them was reasonable.. not very nice.. but reasonable.
 
Last edited:

phs73rc77gsm83

All-Conference
Aug 11, 2011
3,101
3,917
83
Yes, he passed in February, 2010. He was at a base in Alabama, then in West Texas. I can't remember either of their names.

He wanted to join when he was 17, but his mom wouldn't sign the papers. A friend of his in HS did join, was rushed through pilot's training because they didn't have enough, and was shot down and killed in his first mission in Europe. By the time my dad joined they had a logjam, so that's why he never got to the front lines before they dropped the bomb.
The west Texas base might well have been Dalhart Army Air Base, which was where my dad trained on B29s before being deployed. The base’s main function at that time was B29 training.
 
Last edited:

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,903
19,183
113
The west Texas base might well have been Dalhart Army Air Base, which was where my dad trained on B29s before being deployed. The bases main function at that time was B29 training.

My uncle, after flying 56 B-17 missions as a pilot out of North Africa and winning a DFC, became a B-29 flight instructor. He was based in either Dalhart or Kirkland, NM. Only thing I heard about was the belly landing they did once when the landing gear failed. He wasn't a big talker about his military experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: phs73rc77gsm83

koleszar

Heisman
Jan 1, 2010
37,697
59,477
113
My point overall is that the bomb would not have been dropped on a white country just as a white immigrant group, however loathed by Americans, would never end up in a concentration camp here. It’s not a coincidence or mere happenstance is all I’m saying.
So you're saying we dropped the bomb on Japan and not Germany for racist reasons? You seriously can't believe what you just wrote and if you do, your education has failed you.
 

CERU00

All-Conference
Feb 10, 2005
3,626
1,677
0
Yep. If Germany had invaded earlier they could have taken Moscow, which would have changed the whole tenor of the war.
Wrong. You think the Soviets didn't plan for that eventuality? It was about oil/gasoline. The Germans had enough gas reserves for about 6 months offensive operations. Their intelligence of Russian army & reserves grossly underestimated what they were up against. If they didn't capture the oil fields in Russia in the first campaign, and Russia still had many intact armies, it was game over. At that point they could no longer use blitzkreig tactics to encircle newly formed units. The Soviets mobilised very quickly and the Germans could not match the sheer volume of units.
 

chrisru99

All-American
Feb 5, 2003
11,110
5,410
62
Lots of guys with PHD’s in History here and family members who served but the vast majority of you loud mouths never served a minute in the US Military.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knightmoves

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,903
19,183
113
Wrong. You think the Soviets didn't plan for that eventuality? It was about oil/gasoline. The Germans had enough gas reserves for about 6 months offensive operations. Their intelligence of Russian army & reserves grossly underestimated what they were up against. If they didn't capture the oil fields in Russia in the first campaign, and Russia still had many intact armies, it was game over. At that point they could no longer use blitzkreig tactics to encircle newly formed units. The Soviets mobilised very quickly and the Germans could not match the sheer volume of units.

With an extra month they would have captured either Moscow or the oil fields. It was also an extra month that the Soviets would have been unable to throw the reserve armies into the fight. They were still stationed in the Far East worried about Japan. It wasn't until the fall that Soviet intelligence discovered they had plans elsewhere.
 

mdk02

Heisman
Aug 18, 2011
26,903
19,183
113
My point is that most of your guys are career suburban blowhard know it alls who never did **** but read books or watch it on TV.

And if the facts we present are accurate, so what? I think your accusing me of being a blowhard is BS, but even if it were true the issue at hand are the facts and their accuracy. And you lose on that one.
 

KingHigh

All-American
Apr 12, 2005
21,293
9,216
0
Oh, jeez, I wish we could all be as great as you. You likely lack the IQ to understand what you read or watch. Great contribution by the way. You added a lot.

What’s next... slavery wasn’t racist. Just business! Damn blowhards
 

patk89

All-Conference
Jul 25, 2001
6,366
2,497
78
What’s next... slavery wasn’t racist. Just business! Damn blowhards

What are you even talking about here? Makes no sense. You have made it abundantly clear that you see racism in everything. Must be a terrible way to go thru life. You foolishly indicated that it was for racist reasons we bombed Japan and not Germany and were proven an idiot. Try reading a book.
 

KingHigh

All-American
Apr 12, 2005
21,293
9,216
0
What are you even talking about here? Makes no sense. You have made it abundantly clear that you see racism in everything. Must be a terrible way to go thru life. You foolishly indicated that it was for racist reasons we bombed Japan and not Germany and were proven an idiot. Try reading a book.

Nah we weren't racist in the 1940s. It was great. MAGA!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers vs. UMass on Polymarket: What the Odds Mean and How to Trade Them
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
  3. 03 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: Tyler Needham
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers Baseball Transfer Portal Profile: Catcher Thomas Zwirecki 
  5. 05 High School New Jersey high school football head coach suffers serious injury after celebrating win