OT: Grass Fed Beef

FreeDawg

Senior
Oct 6, 2010
3,878
655
98
My father and myself did some R+D last night regarding steaks. He went to whole foods and bought 1 grass fed ribeye, 1 bison ribeye, and I already had buckhead beef's line of ribeyes at the house. All were only seasoned with fresh cracked salt and pepper and olive oil. All 3 were good looking, well marbled steaks. After grilling all 3 to med rare-medium we did a side by side. We knew the buckhead would be good. The bison was very good and kind of surprised us. The grass fed ribeye was far and away the worst. Absolutely no flavor. I'm sure there is health benefits to grass fed organic steaks but when they come to flavor they suck. Not worth the money or hype in my humble opinion.
 

Wicked Pissah

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
1,437
0
0
Whole food bison is about all I grill any more. It is awesome and good for you. If I cheat, it is a tri tip or cowboy ribeye.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,733
20,898
113
I agree, grass fed tastes pretty awful. And there's no health benefit to organic food. You might as well take money out of your wallet and set it on fire.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
I used to think

that about bison, then I had fullblood Wagyu tenderloin at Prime, in Sydney.
 

HD6

Sophomore
Apr 8, 2003
10,019
108
63
Going to be exciting to see you go up against a farmer on this topic.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,733
20,898
113
Actually it's not. And organic farming is not a sustainable practice. It takes more land and resources to produce the crops needed to feed people, requires more tillage that causes more erosion issues and has a higher carbon footprint than conventional agriculture. The organic pesticides sprayed are much more toxic than conventional synthetics and aren't as effective so they have to sprayed more frequently.
 

AHSDawg

Redshirt
Sep 18, 2012
1,680
0
0
Same basic concepts as what are going on in my industry. Thinking that lowering the levels of the bad stuff in something is all takes to make it good. However, what is left is such a concentrated amount of the bad stuff that it is 10x more toxic if you come into contact with it.

Not delving into the food argument. Just the point you made about the pesticides and all makes perfect sense to me in my line.
 

msugolf

Junior
Dec 29, 2008
827
388
63
Actually it's not. And organic farming is not a sustainable practice. It takes more land and resources to produce the crops needed to feed people, requires more tillage that causes more erosion issues and has a higher carbon footprint than conventional agriculture. The organic pesticides sprayed are much more toxic than conventional synthetics and aren't as effective so they have to sprayed more frequently.

Is that what Monsanto told you? The key is to not use any pesticides but I know that's not going to happen in my lifetime. At some point, we have to start acknowledging that the stuff we put on these plants also leaks into the soil and changes its structure, not to mention the water system. Organics might not add any more nutritional benefit than conventional, but they sure as hell could keep the bad junk out of your body.

The truth is no one really knows what pesticides are doing to the human body because we are just at the point in our society where we can start to measure the effects. We've seen a spike in all types of neurological and health disorders -- auto-immune disorders, ADHD, autism, type 1 diabetes -- in the past 50 years. Our diets are killing us plain and simple.
 

Hammer Down

Redshirt
Jul 19, 2014
1,360
0
0
I would think that is due more to refined products, mainly sugars.

Do you realize that the guy you are attempting to argue with is a farmer? Like a real one?
 

Faustdog

All-Conference
Jun 4, 2007
4,004
2,298
113
I like how he went from "this couldn't be further from the truth" to "no one really knows" in the next post.

But Monsanto!!!!
 

AFDawg

Senior
Apr 28, 2010
3,279
525
113
Life expectancy in the US in 1900 was 46 for men and 48 for women. And our diets are killing us?

Safe and abundant food--along with modern medicine--make this the best time to live in the history of the planet.
 

KurtRambis4

Redshirt
Aug 30, 2006
15,926
0
36
Your

point on Monsanto may or may not be correct in regards to the toxicity (I haven't seen the data), but in relation to DCD's first point, they have nothing to do with it.
 

jakldawg

Redshirt
May 1, 2006
4,374
0
36
If you've been eating grain-finished beef your whole life

then you will definitely be able to tell a difference in taste between that and the grass-fed.



If you're really that concerned about your health and all the other stuff... then maybe go easy on the red meat in general (OH HERE WE GO)
 

drt7891

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2010
6,727
0
0
Organic labels have as much (if not more) to do with marketing food as "premium" as anything else. It does cost more to grow "organic" crops, but for the most part, it's there to intice buyers to spend more money on a perceived "premium grade" product.

Source: good friends with someone in the grocery distribution business
 

SignalToNoise

Redshirt
Aug 22, 2012
741
0
0
Life expectancy in the US in 1900 was 46 for men and 48 for women. And our diets are killing us?

Safe and abundant food--along with modern medicine--make this the best time to live in the history of the planet.


No kidding. "Our diets are killing us plain and simple" tops the list of inane stuff I have read on message boards.
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,733
20,898
113
Well that didn't take long to be called a Monsanto shill.

At some point, we have to start acknowledging that the stuff we put on these plants also leaks into the soil and changes its structure,

You have no idea how GMO's or genetics works. We use LESS pesticides now than we have in the past because of these technologies AND they are less toxic.


Did you even read what I said? Organic farms use pesticides that are far more harmful than synthetics. Nicotine sulfate, which is extremely toxic to warm-blooded animals, and rotenone, which is moderately toxic to most mammals but so toxic to fish that it's widely used for the mass poisoning of unwanted fish populations during restocking projects are pretty common in organic farming. Copper sulfate is another pesticide used that's pretty toxic.

And since you brought up Monsanto, roundup (glyphosate) is less lethal than table salt and chocolate.

https://doccamiryan.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/toxicity-table4.png

And please please, please do not link autism to pesticides. That study has been trashed by every major scientific group and the only way it was published was through a journal that will publish anything as long as you pay.
 
Last edited:

drt7891

Redshirt
Dec 6, 2010
6,727
0
0
Life is full of risks and I try to live frugally... But eating an ear of corn that was sprayed with synthetic pesticide is not one of the things I choose to worry about.

you kicked the door with your red meat comment lol.
 

thf24

Redshirt
Jan 28, 2011
1,334
3
38
Based on your posts thus far, you're not going to accept it, but you're the one who's buying into the propaganda bud.
 

cowboydawg

Junior
Dec 23, 2009
190
200
43
I'm with Desoto on this one. But my BS in Food Science and MS in Food Safety along with daily work with organic and conventional foods hardly qualifies me to speak on the subject.

Oh and grass fed beef is definitely inferior...
 
Nov 16, 2005
27,733
20,898
113
Not really my expertise but I think organic milk and regular milk are virtually the same. Organic dairies don't give their cows antibiotics but that's not really a big deal because conventional dairies isolate their cows on antibiotics and their milk is dumped and put in the supply with the healthy cows. You could ask @gilmerdairy on twitter. Will can tell you more than I can.
 

CochiseCowbell

Heisman
Oct 29, 2012
14,316
11,714
113
This thread is highly entertaining.

Almost as much fun as celebrating the 5th of July with Coca-Cola!*
 

cowbell88

Senior
Jan 11, 2009
3,242
946
113
That USDA grain fed choice sticker is much more than just package decoration, it's a sense of pride and quality.

Organic will feed your family just like a "garden" has for centuries, but when you depend on food that that 1% of the population produces to feed your ***; then all of a sudden traditional/GMO cropping situations ain't that terrible after all.
 

aTotal360

Heisman
Nov 12, 2009
21,847
14,621
113
And measles is no longer an issue.**
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sutterkane

Redshirt
Jan 23, 2007
5,100
0
0
My opinion with organics is they are more or less the same stuff. Sometimes it's better sometimes it's not. We've also been using genetics in farming since the Egyptians; I have no problem with buying or eating genetically modified food.

Where I do draw the line is with food coloring. I see no reason why we have red 40 and yellow 5 in everything. Like pills for example, wtf do those need dyes for. I also believe there are a good amount of people who exude some sort of allergy to these dyes(mainly kids) which can cause behavioral issues. I've seen it first hand in some children, while others are fine.
 

thekimmer

All-Conference
Aug 30, 2012
8,244
2,224
113
All points made are truly excellent......

Well that didn't take long to be called a Monsanto shill.



You have no idea how GMO's or genetics works. We use LESS pesticides now than we have in the past because of these technologies AND they are less toxic.


Did you even read what I said? Organic farms use pesticides that are far more harmful than synthetics. Nicotine sulfate, which is extremely toxic to warm-blooded animals, and rotenone, which is moderately toxic to most mammals but so toxic to fish that it's widely used for the mass poisoning of unwanted fish populations during restocking projects are pretty common in organic farming. Copper sulfate is another pesticide used that's pretty toxic.

And since you brought up Monsanto, roundup (glyphosate) is less lethal than table salt and chocolate.

https://doccamiryan.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/toxicity-table4.png

And please please, please do not link autism to pesticides. That study has been trashed by every major scientific group and the only way it was published was through a journal that will publish anything as long as you pay.

This is one of two subjects that really grind my gears. The other one is the anti-vaccine crowd but I digress....

For both groups, they apparently want to take the developed world back to the turn of the century and beyond. Specifically, the 'organic food' crowd wants to throw away 100+ years of advances in agricultural science from we are now feeding more people on less land and resources with the safest and most abundant food supply in the history of mankind to a system that is frankly unsustainable. All for the perceived notion that we are being harmed by toxins in our food supply. I say perceived because they have ZERO empirical data to support their accusations.

They want to play the 'big pharma' game or in this case the 'big agriculture' game painting large companies as the Boogie Man who is just out to kill people for a profit when they totally ignore the profit made by organic food companies that have significant margins.
 

UpTheMiddlex3Punt

All-Conference
May 28, 2007
17,963
3,966
113
Not all grass fed is organic and not all organic is grass fed. The fat profile of grass fed beef is different from grain fed beef. That's why it tastes different and cooks differently. I've had some good grass-fed beef and some downright awful grass-fed beef. I've actually found it on sale and cheaper than grain fed beef in the past and cost doesn't seem to have anything to do with quality on grass fed. Another point is that grass fed has no official regulatory definition. All beef cattle are grass fed until they are finished on a feed lot (or finished on grass). You could buy grass fed that is partially corn fed beef.

The main benefit of eating organic is that it makes you focus on preparing food yourself. You can get conventionally grown produce and do the same thing.
 

BulldogBlitz

Heisman
Dec 11, 2008
16,290
20,603
113
so.... does a fight over beef make this a slow sports day... or us way too passionate about beef (and labeling)?

hehe.
 

AgDawg

Redshirt
May 24, 2006
276
0
16
DesotoCountyDawg is right that the crop protection products being applied today are safer and more friendly for the environment than ever. The time it takes to get a new crop protection product approved has gone from 30-60 days to now over 3 years due to the amount of research and testing. I encourage you to actually read from all sources of info if this is something you care about. Reading only from the whole foods perspective is not going to give you the real story. People have and will manipulate the story to get you to buy from them.
 

msualohadog

Senior
Oct 25, 2014
501
689
93
I've always said it like this. If you were eating humans; would you rather eat the in-shape athlete who works out and visits GNC, or the skinny jeans wearing hacky sack playing dope smoking hipster dude who's all organic????