OT: Bengals vs Chiefs Game Thread

fischy5000

Senior
Dec 11, 2008
2,666
932
0
IDK. I thought it was a very soft call. Incidental contact and Mahomes flopped. But the CBS rules expert disagreed so what do I know.
I think it was the fact that he extended his arms with what appeared to be a push even if soft push. If he just collided with him because they were running full speed and just crashed i bet they might not have called it.
Also, seemed like a big holding call before mahomes started running which could have negated the entire thing anyway.
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,952
0
There were 3 huge calls in the early game that massively affected the game.
1. Smith clearly dropped the 4th down pass.
2. The punt clearly hit the wire overhead.
3. Purdy's fumble was recovered and would have been returned, perhaps for a TD, but was blown dead.
Those aren't even things like holding or PI. Those were just blatant misses.
Wrong game Einstein
 
May 11, 2010
72,487
56,952
0
No kidding, genius. The post I quoted referenced that the refereeing across the two games was atrocious. I was commenting about that directly.
Here's a comment for you. Stop being a dick. No one here is impressed by your 4th grade-level insults.

You’ve been very angry of late in addition to commenting on the wrong game.

You sure you’re an Eagles fan?
 

AZBlues

All-Conference
Sep 29, 2013
1,185
1,389
0
Ever get pushed at full speed with humans and a bench in your path, not to mention a bum ankle?
Right.. Not sure if you might have thought that I felt that Mahomes flopped, but I didn't. Doctor Worm felt that Mahomes flopped and that his flop was the reason for the flag, and I was disagreeing like other posters also did.
 

Rutgers Chris

All-American
Nov 29, 2005
5,518
6,549
97
Right.. Not sure if you might have thought that I felt that Mahomes flopped, but I didn't. Doctor Worm felt that Mahomes flopped and that his flop was the reason for the flag, and I was disagreeing like other posters also did.
Great angle here. To me it wasn’t as much of the push or a flop, their feet getting tangled did the most damage.
 

jmc11201

Heisman
Dec 16, 2005
11,753
16,952
113
All players who are on the active 53-man roster the Sunday immediately preceding the conference championship games will earn $65,000, up $6,000 from last year. Players from the winning Super Bowl team will cash an extra $150,000 each, while those from the losing team will earn $75,000 for their efforts.

Either way if this link is true he’s doing just fine

That's fantastic real world money, but considering the short career these guys have, I really hope Isiah gets good financial advice because an injury or two and that money can run out fast. Only the NBA pays their players well enough where it would be really tough to blow it all, while football is at the other end of the spectrum.
 

SouthJerseyRU

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2002
4,754
3,093
113
Kelce seems like ding-dong (ans he looks like House of Pain - Jump - rapper)
His brother is a great OL for Eagles so get ready for the flood

Used to think that as well about Travis, but ever since I started listening to their podcast together I changed my mind. These guys have great football minds and are able to relate what they are talking about to common folk. Both also have a fun loving side but their styles differ. Travis's style is douche cousin and Jason's style is drunk uncle .

Amazing that both of them are the best at their positions at the same time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashokan

ashokan

Heisman
May 3, 2011
25,325
19,690
0
Used to think that as well about Travis, but ever since I started listening to their podcast together I changed my mind. These guys have great football minds and are able to relate what they are talking about to common folk. Both also have a fun loving side but their styles differ. Travis's style is douche cousin and Jason's style is drunk uncle .

Amazing that both of them are the best at their positions at the same time.

Unfortunately both of them went to Cincy and Cincy is one of the few teams I just seem to dislike
I never liked the uniforms, or Mauk taunting RU fans, or L'ville follow-up, or Kelly yelling and spitting at players, or players named "Munchie" - too many reasons compared to other teams. I even liked WV when they were always kicking butt
 

Doctor Worm

Heisman
Feb 7, 2002
30,965
22,729
113
I think it was the fact that he extended his arms with what appeared to be a push even if soft push. If he just collided with him because they were running full speed and just crashed i bet they might not have called it.
Also, seemed like a big holding call before mahomes started running which could have negated the entire thing anyway.
I agree. if he had just kept his arms down it might not have been called.
 

beaced_rivals

Heisman
Jul 18, 2004
32,005
10,324
113
Right.. Not sure if you might have thought that I felt that Mahomes flopped, but I didn't. Doctor Worm felt that Mahomes flopped and that his flop was the reason for the flag, and I was disagreeing like other posters also did.
Don't know the issue here,BUT, if ZAPPAA likes it ,beaced likes it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knight Shift

newell138

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
37,929
49,721
112
That's fantastic real world money, but considering the short career these guys have, I really hope Isiah gets good financial advice because an injury or two and that money can run out fast. Only the NBA pays their players well enough where it would be really tough to blow it all, while football is at the other end of the spectrum.
Yet 60% of all NBA players are broke within 5 years of leaving the sport
 

newell138

Heisman
Aug 1, 2001
37,929
49,721
112
Used to think that as well about Travis, but ever since I started listening to their podcast together I changed my mind. These guys have great football minds and are able to relate what they are talking about to common folk. Both also have a fun loving side but their styles differ. Travis's style is douche cousin and Jason's style is drunk uncle .

Amazing that both of them are the best at their positions at the same time.

Jason definitely is your average guy. He bartends in Sea Isle City every summer for some fundraiser and you can tell he is really enjoying the moment and interacting with fans.
 
Nov 23, 2015
892
850
0
There were 3 huge calls in the early game that massively affected the game.
1. Smith clearly dropped the 4th down pass.
2. The punt clearly hit the wire overhead.
3. Purdy's fumble was recovered and would have been returned, perhaps for a TD, but was blown dead.
Those aren't even things like holding or PI. Those were just blatant misses.
I think calling 1 and 2 "blatant misses" is pretty harsh.

The 4th down pass would have been very tough to call in real time, and needed several angles to finally find one that showed the ball hitting the ground and moving slightly.

The punt seems to have hit the wire, however there wasn't a good angle of it that I saw, and it would be pretty tough to fault the referees since they all have responsibilities on the field and aren't just all looking at the sky watching the ball while it's in flight. Logic dictates that it hit it, but don't see how they could have overturned it.
 

fischy5000

Senior
Dec 11, 2008
2,666
932
0
I think calling 1 and 2 "blatant misses" is pretty harsh.

The 4th down pass would have been very tough to call in real time, and needed several angles to finally find one that showed the ball hitting the ground and moving slightly.

The punt seems to have hit the wire, however there wasn't a good angle of it that I saw, and it would be pretty tough to fault the referees since they all have responsibilities on the field and aren't just all looking at the sky watching the ball while it's in flight. Logic dictates that it hit it, but don't see how they could have overturned it.
Agree with what you mentioned re the refs being preoccupied with on field/player watching but isn’t this what those in the moment replay officials are for (the ones that buzz in on generally clear cut plays that the officials miss even if coach doesn’t challenge?)
*disclaimer- I didn’t see the play so not sure how obvious or not it was.
 
Nov 23, 2015
892
850
0
Agree with what you mentioned re the refs being preoccupied with on field/player watching but isn’t this what those in the moment replay officials are for (the ones that buzz in on generally clear cut plays that the officials miss even if coach doesn’t challenge?)
*disclaimer- I didn’t see the play so not sure how obvious or not it was.
They did stop the game and reviewed it since the play was so odd, but couldn’t find anything indisputable on the video. Again, issue is that no cameras are tracking the ball closely when it’s 100 feet above the field.

To me, it was obvious from a “everyone on the Eagles bench was pointing at the sky and it didn’t look like he shanked the punt that badly”…but nothing to actually show the ball hitting the wire (though I despise those cameras, so maybe this can help put an end to them).
 

mikebal9

All-Conference
Oct 15, 2005
5,738
4,976
113
They did stop the game and reviewed it since the play was so odd, but couldn’t find anything indisputable on the video. Again, issue is that no cameras are tracking the ball closely when it’s 100 feet above the field.

To me, it was obvious from a “everyone on the Eagles bench was pointing at the sky and it didn’t look like he shanked the punt that badly”…but nothing to actually show the ball hitting the wire (though I despise those cameras, so maybe this can help put an end to them).
You couldn't see it hit the wire. Unfortunately, the best evidence was how drastically the spin on the ball changed, which isn't considered visual evidence.
 

SouthJerseyRU

All-Conference
Jan 30, 2002
4,754
3,093
113
I think calling 1 and 2 "blatant misses" is pretty harsh.

The 4th down pass would have been very tough to call in real time, and needed several angles to finally find one that showed the ball hitting the ground and moving slightly.

The punt seems to have hit the wire, however there wasn't a good angle of it that I saw, and it would be pretty tough to fault the referees since they all have responsibilities on the field and aren't just all looking at the sky watching the ball while it's in flight. Logic dictates that it hit it, but don't see how they could have overturned it.

The intelligence of DeVanta Smith played a key role in the 4th down no catch. He gave the Eagles the hurry up signal and they got to the line to take the next snap before several replays could be seen. Also Shanahan should have challenged it anyway, but his in game management continues to haunt him.

Agree with what you mentioned re the refs being preoccupied with on field/player watching but isn’t this what those in the moment replay officials are for (the ones that buzz in on generally clear cut plays that the officials miss even if coach doesn’t challenge?)
*disclaimer- I didn’t see the play so not sure how obvious or not it was.

They did stop the game and reviewed it since the play was so odd, but couldn’t find anything indisputable on the video. Again, issue is that no cameras are tracking the ball closely when it’s 100 feet above the field.

To me, it was obvious from a “everyone on the Eagles bench was pointing at the sky and it didn’t look like he shanked the punt that badly”…but nothing to actually show the ball hitting the wire (though I despise those cameras, so maybe this can help put an end to them).

A bunch of people on twitter pointed out that they wondered why the couldn't just use the footage from the skycam here, if it shook during the punt then it was obviously hit.
 
The Knight Report

Latest

  1. 01 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: Dantae Chin
  2. 02 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Fall Camp: Get 75% off The Knight Report - Final Day!
  3. 03 The Knight Report 2027 Rutgers Football Recruits Season Stat Tracker: Week 0 Edition
  4. 04 The Knight Report Rutgers QB Dylan Lonergan's HS Coach Breaks Down His Game, Journey and Tape - TKR Pod
  5. 05 The Knight Report Rutgers Football Top 10 Countdown: J'Dan Burnett