OT: Baseball HOF Thread

T2Kplus10

Heisman
Feb 24, 2010
28,180
17,566
0
Will Jeter be unanimous #2?

Walker or Schilling?

Any of the steroid guys? We will find out in 30 mins.
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,634
6,873
113
So they had Jayson Stark, Peter Gammons, the Post's Joel Sherman and 4yh guy's name escapes me. They were asked how many get in this year. One said 3 including Schilling, 2 said Jeter and Walker only and Gammons said Walker just misses out and Jeter goes in alone
 

FELONIOUSMONK

All-American
Apr 1, 2012
11,909
5,090
0
I am historically a man of verbal violence only but Mr.397 should die painfully over a long period of time. Was he the most talented player/shortstop/hitter/ fielder/ runner? No of course not. Would Joe Torre be Joe Torre without him? Nope.Would they have won all those titles without him? Nope. No Jeter. No core four. This sucks. But he's in. Game Set Match.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NickKnight 1

Beancounter88

All-Conference
Dec 22, 2010
3,490
2,340
0
Both deserve it - congrats to them. Lame argument, but if Mays, Aaron, Griffey are not 100%, Jeter sure as heck shouldn’t get it. They should change how they vote and make it like MVP (points for spots 1-5), so a guy like Jeter gets on every ballot but maybe gets a couple of 4s. Some people think there are all-time super HOFers that should be a little different from others.
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,634
6,873
113
So Larry says going in the Hall with Jeter was like one of those 45's from way back. Jeter was the A side and the B side, the song you never listen to, that was him. Very funny moment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhiteBus

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,350
38,102
113
I wonder what would be that one person's reasoning for not voting Jeter.

I am a Met's fan but we have to face facts...First thing most people think about Jeter is that he was more of a "baseball player" than a stats guy. But how many players in MLB history have played 20 years, all at one position(one of the toughest positions as well) and the same team and their 162 game average is over 200 hits, 113 runs 51 extra base hits. And it wasn't like he was just a punch and judy guy either- he also averaged 15 HR, 20+ SB 8 top 10 MVP years etc...
Even if a player averaged those numbers over a 12-15 year period, playing SS, he would be HOF.

But congrats...I would just take away voting rights to anyone that didn't vote for him.
 

ru109

All-American
Sep 18, 2011
6,914
5,431
113
When Griffey did not get 100% then who else should? Trout some day?


Joe DiMaggio didn't get in on the first ballot so does that mean that no one should? The BBWA have a huge ego and think they are god. But just because Babe Ruth or Griffey didn't get 100% that doesn't mean that no one should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T2Kplus10

T2Kplus10

Heisman
Feb 24, 2010
28,180
17,566
0
I wonder what would be that one person's reasoning for not voting Jeter.

I am a Met's fan but we have to face facts...First thing most people think about Jeter is that he was more of a "baseball player" than a stats guy. But how many players in MLB history have played 20 years, all at one position(one of the toughest positions as well) and the same team and their 162 game average is over 200 hits, 113 runs 51 extra base hits. And it wasn't like he was just a punch and judy guy either- he also averaged 15 HR, 20+ SB 8 top 10 MVP years etc...
Even if a player averaged those numbers over a 12-15 year period, playing SS, he would be HOF.

But congrats...I would just take away voting rights to anyone that didn't vote for him.
3465
If someone asks for stats, that's the only # Jeter needs to point to. Case closed.
 

T2Kplus10

Heisman
Feb 24, 2010
28,180
17,566
0
Could be a Met fan, not voting for Jeter.
True, probably still crying over this:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jm0513

DJ Spanky

Heisman
Jul 25, 2001
48,155
59,049
113
Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, arguably the greatest hitter and pitcher of their generation, continue to remain well short of induction due to performance-enhancing drug ties. Bonds appeared 60.7 percent of submitted ballots, Clemens 61.0 percent. Both have two years of Hall of Fame eligibility remaining, though their support has stagnated in the 50-60 percent range the last few years. Barring a sudden jump in support the next two years, neither will qualify for Cooperstown.
Wouldn't that be a shame?
 

tom1944

All-American
Feb 22, 2008
6,596
6,972
0
Joe DiMaggio didn't get in on the first ballot so does that mean that no one should? The BBWA have a huge ego and think they are god. But just because Babe Ruth or Griffey didn't get 100% that doesn't mean that no one should.


I wonder how they explained that
 

tomatocan

Junior
Jan 26, 2005
382
297
63
Walker only suffered from not playing in major media markets. His offensive and defensive skills absolutely made him a HOFer.

Don't think anyone's crying any tears over Shilling's miss. As a human being what a piece of crap.
 

czxqa

All-American
Oct 31, 2008
8,634
6,873
113
I wonder how they explained that
There were quite a few writers back on the old days that just felt that nobody should get in on the first ballot unless they were comparable to the first class- Ty Cobb, Walter Johnson, Christy Mathewson, Honus Wagner, and Babe Ruth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knightfan7

WhiteBus

Heisman
Oct 4, 2011
39,516
21,916
113
In my mind neither Walker or Schilling are hall of famers.
Schilling certainly isn't and I lived in Philly during their incredible run. Regular season number meh but playoffs were great. If you vote people based on their off-season numbers than Brian Doyle should go in first. Which is stupid and why career numbers are the bases of entering.
I disagree with those that thing Walker doesn't belong. Too me he is a no brainer. Not a first ballot guy but definately belongs in the HOF.
 

yesrutgers01

Heisman
Nov 9, 2008
122,350
38,102
113
When Griffey did not get 100% then who else should? Trout some day?
The problem is back in his day and earlier, there were always at least a handful of writers that NEVER voted for anyone on their first ballot. It doesn't justify it but that was their thought process.
Right now, most ballots get reported so a writer may have to give a baseball reason for not voting him in. I hope they show who didn't vote for him and have him explain it.
 

T2Kplus10

Heisman
Feb 24, 2010
28,180
17,566
0
Schilling certainly isn't and I lived in Philly during their incredible run. Regular season number meh but playoffs were great. If you vote people based on their off-season numbers than Brian Doyle should go in first. Which is stupid and why career numbers are the bases of entering.
I disagree with those that thing Walker doesn't belong. Too me he is a no brainer. Not a first ballot guy but definately belongs in the HOF.
Schilling had a few HOF moments, but not a HOF career. Different things.
 
Last edited:

Ataylor1989x

All-Conference
Dec 11, 2015
2,209
2,355
0
The only argument against Walker is that his home numbers were dramatically better than his away numbers, which means something when his home field is in the Mile-High thin air.
 

Retired711

Heisman
Nov 20, 2001
19,971
10,149
58
What credentials do you hold? Yeah, just as I thought, you're a good fan, but no expert.

Are baseball writers experts? I wish they were, but to me they're just guys who have seen a lot of games, and who are as influenced by nonsense (e.g. who got along best with the writers?) as anyone else. Everybody's entitled to an opinion -- that's what great about sports.
 

Colbert17!

Heisman
Aug 30, 2014
17,381
18,820
113
No problem with Jeter not getting 100%.

Check out this table of HOF voting. Complete table attached.

Number of Voters Who Did Not Vote for a Candidate (a sample)

Jeter - 1
Cobb - 4
Aaron - 9
Bench - 16
Ruth - 11
Mays - 23
Williams - 20
Musial - 23
Cy Young - 48!!!!

No reason for people to make a big deal about this

https://www.baseball-reference.com/bullpen/Hall_of_Fame_Voting_Percentages